Laboratory of Neurobiology of Inflammatory and Metabolic Processes (NEUROIMet), Graduate Program in Health Sciences, University of South Santa Catarina, Tubarão, SC, Brazil.
Laboratory of Experimental Pathophysiology, Graduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Criciúma, SC, Brazil.
Inflammation. 2020 Jun;43(3):1019-1034. doi: 10.1007/s10753-020-01187-z.
The use of reliable scores is a constant development in critical illness. According to Sepsis-3 consensus, the use of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or more is associated with a higher mortality of sepsis patients. In experimental research, due murine animal model limitations, the use of a score systems can be an alternative to assess sepsis severity. In this work, we suggest a sickness behavior score (SBS) that uses physiological variables to assess sepsis severity and mortality. Animals were evaluated daily by the presence of six indicators of sickness behavior: temperature alteration, preference of water/sucrose, liquid intake, food intake, body weight, and movimentation. Male adult Wistar rats were evaluated daily after sepsis induction by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) or laparotomy only (sham) for determination of SBS. Oxidative stress, IL-6, and HPA axis markers (corticosterone and adrenal gland weight) were evaluated 24 h after CLP to determine the correlation with the acute SBS and neuroinflammation. Also, BDNF and four cognitive behavioral tests were correlated with the chronic SBS, i.e., sum of 8 days after surgery. In result, septic rats presented higher SBS than sham animals. Sepsis severity markers were associated with acute and chronic SBS. Also, SBS was negative correlated with the cognitive tests. In conclusion, SBS shows to be reliable score to predict sepsis severity and mortality. The use of score system provides the analysis of global sickness behavior, beyond evaluation of each parameter individually.
可靠评分的使用是危重病学的不断发展。根据 Sepsis-3 共识,序贯器官衰竭评估 (SOFA) 评分≥2 与脓毒症患者的死亡率较高相关。在实验研究中,由于啮齿动物模型的局限性,评分系统的使用可以替代评估脓毒症的严重程度。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种疾病行为评分 (SBS),该评分使用生理变量来评估脓毒症的严重程度和死亡率。动物每天通过六种疾病行为指标的存在进行评估:体温改变、对水/蔗糖的偏好、液体摄入、食物摄入、体重和运动。雄性成年 Wistar 大鼠在盲肠结扎和穿刺 (CLP) 或仅剖腹手术后每天评估脓毒症诱导后的 SBS。在 CLP 后 24 小时评估氧化应激、IL-6 和 HPA 轴标志物(皮质酮和肾上腺重量),以确定与急性 SBS 和神经炎症的相关性。此外,BDNF 和四项认知行为测试与慢性 SBS 相关,即手术后 8 天的总和。结果,脓毒症大鼠的 SBS 高于假手术动物。脓毒症严重程度标志物与急性和慢性 SBS 相关。此外,SBS 与认知测试呈负相关。总之,SBS 是一种可靠的评分,可用于预测脓毒症的严重程度和死亡率。评分系统的使用提供了对整体疾病行为的分析,而不仅仅是对每个参数的单独评估。