• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

年龄、种族和收入与一家医疗保障医院较低的筛查率有关。

Age, Race, and Income Are Associated With Lower Screening Rates at a Safety Net Hospital.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Sleep and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Computational Biomedicine Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 May;109(5):1544-1550. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.052. Epub 2020 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.052
PMID:31981498
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While lung cancer screening improves cancer-specific mortality and is recommended for high-risk patients, barriers to screening still exist. We sought to determine our institution's (an urban safety net hospital) screening rate and to identify socioeconomic barriers to lung cancer screening.

METHODS

We identified 8935 smokers 55 to 80 years of age evaluated by a primary care physician between March 2015 and March 2017 at our institution. We randomly selected one-third of these (n = 2978) to review for eligibility using the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force criteria for lung cancer screening. Using our institution's Lung Cancer Screening Program clinical tracking database, we identified patients who were screened from March 2015 to March 2017. We collected demographic information (race, primary language, education status, and median income) and evaluated possible associations with screening.

RESULTS

Among our institution population, 99 patients meeting U.S. Preventive Services Task Force screening criteria underwent screening computed tomography, whereas 516 eligible patients were not screened, making our institution's estimated screening rate 16.1%. Comparing the unscreened population with those who received screening at our institution, the unscreened population was significantly older (median age of screened patients was 63 years, of unscreened patients was 66 years; P < .001). African Americans had a lower screening rate (37.6% of the screened population and 47.5% of the unscreened population; P < .001). Unscreened patients had a lower annual household income.

CONCLUSIONS

The lung cancer screening rate at our hospital is 16.1%. Unscreened patients were older, were more likely to be African American, and had a lower median income. These findings highlight possible screening barriers and potential areas for targeted strategies to decrease disparities in lung cancer screening.

摘要

背景

虽然肺癌筛查可提高癌症特异性死亡率,且被推荐用于高危患者,但筛查仍存在障碍。我们旨在确定本机构(一家城市医疗保障医院)的筛查率,并确定肺癌筛查的社会经济障碍。

方法

我们在本机构鉴定了 8935 名年龄在 55 岁至 80 岁之间的吸烟者,这些患者均由初级保健医生在 2015 年 3 月至 2017 年 3 月间进行评估。我们随机选择其中的三分之一(n=2978),并使用美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的肺癌筛查标准进行筛查资格审查。利用本机构的肺癌筛查计划临床跟踪数据库,我们确定了在 2015 年 3 月至 2017 年 3 月间进行筛查的患者。我们收集了人口统计学信息(种族、主要语言、教育程度和中位数收入),并评估了与筛查相关的可能关联。

结果

在本机构人群中,有 99 名符合 USPSTF 筛查标准的患者接受了筛查 CT,而有 516 名符合条件的患者未进行筛查,本机构的估计筛查率为 16.1%。与接受本机构筛查的人群相比,未筛查人群的年龄明显更大(筛查患者的中位年龄为 63 岁,未筛查患者的中位年龄为 66 岁;P<0.001)。非裔美国人的筛查率较低(筛查人群中有 37.6%为非裔美国人,未筛查人群中有 47.5%为非裔美国人;P<0.001)。未筛查患者的家庭年收入较低。

结论

本医院的肺癌筛查率为 16.1%。未筛查患者的年龄较大,更可能为非裔美国人,且中位数收入较低。这些发现突显了可能的筛查障碍和潜在的目标策略领域,以减少肺癌筛查中的差异。

相似文献

1
Age, Race, and Income Are Associated With Lower Screening Rates at a Safety Net Hospital.年龄、种族和收入与一家医疗保障医院较低的筛查率有关。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 May;109(5):1544-1550. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.11.052. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
2
Evaluating efficacy of current lung cancer screening guidelines.评估现行肺癌筛查指南的有效性。
J Med Screen. 2017 Dec;24(4):208-213. doi: 10.1177/0969141316689111. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Risk Prediction Model Versus United States Preventive Services Task Force Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Criteria: Reducing Race Disparities.风险预测模型与美国预防服务工作组肺癌筛查资格标准:减少种族差异。
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Nov;15(11):1738-1747. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.08.006. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Initial surgical experience following implementation of lung cancer screening at an urban safety net hospital.在城市医疗救助医院实施肺癌筛查后的初始手术经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2674-2681. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.12.135. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
Patient navigation for lung cancer screening in an urban safety-net system: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.城市安全网系统中肺癌筛查的患者导航:一项实用随机临床试验的方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Sep;60:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
6
Risk Factors for Lung Cancer in an Underrepresented Safety-Net Screening Cohort.代表性不足的安全网筛查队列中肺癌的危险因素。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2022 Mar;23(2):e165-e170. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
Black Race Remains Associated with Lower Eligibility for Screening Using 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations Among Lung Cancer Patients at an Urban Safety Net Hospital.在美国城市医疗系统中,对于肺癌患者,黑人种族仍然与 2021 年美国预防服务工作组的推荐使用筛查的低资格率相关。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Dec;10(6):2836-2843. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01460-x. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
8
Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration.在退伍军人健康管理局实施肺癌筛查。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):399-406. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9022.
9
Geographic Accessibility and Completion of Initial Low-Dose CT-Based Lung Cancer Screening in an Urban Safety-Net Population.城市医疗服务体系中基于低剂量 CT 的肺癌筛查初始阶段的地理可及性与完成情况。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Apr 26;22(5):308-314. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7112.
10
Characteristics of Persons Screened for Lung Cancer in the United States : A Cohort Study.美国肺癌筛查人群的特征:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Nov;175(11):1501-1505. doi: 10.7326/M22-1325. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of cessation readiness among cigarette smokers presenting for low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening in community settings (WF-20817CD).在社区环境中接受低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查的吸烟者中戒烟意愿的预测因素(WF-20817CD)
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Jul 22. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0293.
2
Lung cancer screening among minority groups: Identifying gaps in screening and opportunities for intervention.少数群体中的肺癌筛查:识别筛查差距与干预机会。
JTCVS Open. 2024 Jul 10;21:341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.07.001. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Lung Cancer Screening: Early Detection Decreases Mortality.
肺癌筛查:早期发现可降低死亡率。
Dela J Public Health. 2024 Aug 28;10(3):22-24. doi: 10.32481/djph.2024.08.07. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Patient Lung Cancer Screening Decisions and Environmental and Psychosocial Factors.患者肺癌筛查决策与环境及心理社会因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2412880. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.12880.
5
Understanding the perceived benefits, barriers, and cues to action for lung cancer screening among Latinos: A qualitative study.了解拉丁裔人群对肺癌筛查的感知益处、障碍及行动提示:一项定性研究。
Front Oncol. 2024 Mar 20;14:1365739. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1365739. eCollection 2024.
6
The Gap of Health Inequalities Amongst Lung Cancer Patients of Different Socioeconomic Status: A Brief Reference to the Greek Reality.不同社会经济地位肺癌患者的健康不平等差距:以希腊实际情况为例
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;16(5):906. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050906.
7
Efficacy of Digital Outreach Strategies for Collecting Smoking Data: Pragmatic Randomized Trial.数字外展策略收集吸烟数据的效果:实用随机试验
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Feb 9;8:e50465. doi: 10.2196/50465.
8
Assessing the impact of socioeconomic status on incidental lung nodules at an urban safety net hospital.评估社会经济地位对城市医疗服务体系医院偶然发现肺结节的影响。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Nov 23;23(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02726-8.
9
Socio-economic inequalities in lung cancer mortality in Spain: a nation-wide study using area-based deprivation.西班牙肺癌死亡率的社会经济不平等:一项基于地区贫困程度的全国性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Aug 2;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01970-y.
10
A narrative review of lung cancer screening in underserved populations.对服务不足人群肺癌筛查的叙述性综述。
Curr Chall Thorac Surg. 2023;5. doi: 10.21037/ccts-20-173. Epub 2023 Feb 25.