• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

持续血流左心室辅助装置治疗对慢性肾脏病的影响:一项纵向多中心研究。

Impact of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy on Chronic Kidney Disease: A Longitudinal Multicenter Study.

机构信息

Thoraxcenter, Unit Heart Failure, Transplantation and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2020 Apr;26(4):333-341. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.01.010
PMID:31981698
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients undergoing durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation suffer from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, we investigated the effect of LVAD support on CKD.

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter cohort study, including all patients undergoing LVAD (HeartMate II (n = 330), HeartMate 3 (n = 22) and HeartWare (n = 48) implantation. In total, 227 (56.8%) patients were implanted as bridge-to-transplantation; 154 (38.5%) as destination therapy; and 19 (4.7%) as bridge-to-decision. Serum creatinine measurements were collected over a 2-year follow-up period. Patients were stratified based on CKD stage.

RESULTS

Overall, 400 patients (mean age 53 ± 14 years, 75% male) were included: 186 (46.5%) patients had CKD stage 1 or 2; 93 (23.3%) had CKD stage 3a; 82 (20.5%) had CKD stage 3b; and 39 (9.8%) had CKD stage 4 or 5 prior to LVAD implantation. During a median follow-up of 179 days (IQR 28-627), 32,629 creatinine measurements were available. Improvement of kidney function was noticed in every preoperative CKD-stage group. Following this improvement, estimated glomerular filtration rates regressed to baseline values for all CKD stages. Patients showing early renal function improvement were younger and in worse preoperative condition. Moreover, survival rates were higher in patients showing early improvement (69% vs 56%, log-rank P = 0 .013).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal function following LVAD implantation is characterized by improvement, steady state and subsequent deterioration. Patients who showed early renal function improvement were in worse preoperative condition, however, and had higher survival rates at 2 years of follow-up.

摘要

背景

许多接受耐用性左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入的患者患有慢性肾脏病(CKD)。因此,我们研究了 LVAD 支持对 CKD 的影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性多中心队列研究,纳入所有接受 LVAD(HeartMate II(n=330)、HeartMate 3(n=22)和 HeartWare(n=48)植入的患者。共有 227 例(56.8%)患者作为移植桥接植入;154 例(38.5%)作为终末期治疗;19 例(4.7%)作为决策桥接。在 2 年的随访期间收集血清肌酐测量值。根据 CKD 分期对患者进行分层。

结果

共纳入 400 例患者(平均年龄 53±14 岁,75%为男性):186 例(46.5%)患者 CKD 分期 1 或 2 期;93 例(23.3%)患者 CKD 分期 3a 期;82 例(20.5%)患者 CKD 分期 3b 期;39 例(9.8%)患者在植入 LVAD 前 CKD 分期 4 或 5 期。在中位随访 179 天(IQR 28-627)期间,可获得 32629 次肌酐测量值。在每个术前 CKD 分期组中均观察到肾功能改善。在这种改善之后,所有 CKD 分期的估计肾小球滤过率都回归到基线值。早期肾功能改善的患者更年轻,术前情况更差。此外,早期改善的患者生存率更高(69%比 56%,log-rank P=0.013)。

结论

LVAD 植入后肾功能的特点是改善、稳定和随后的恶化。然而,早期肾功能改善的患者术前情况更差,但在 2 年随访时生存率更高。

相似文献

1
Impact of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy on Chronic Kidney Disease: A Longitudinal Multicenter Study.持续血流左心室辅助装置治疗对慢性肾脏病的影响:一项纵向多中心研究。
J Card Fail. 2020 Apr;26(4):333-341. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and End-stage Renal Disease and Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device: Insights From the United States Renal Data System Database.慢性肾脏病和终末期肾病患者使用耐久性左心室辅助装置的结果:来自美国肾脏数据系统数据库的见解。
J Card Fail. 2022 Nov;28(11):1604-1614. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.03.355. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
3
The impact of the OPTN policy change on patients with a durable left ventricular assist device and chronic kidney disease: Analysis of the UNOS database.OPTN 政策变化对具有耐用性左心室辅助装置和慢性肾脏病患者的影响:UNOS 数据库分析。
Artif Organs. 2024 Oct;48(10):1180-1189. doi: 10.1111/aor.14770. Epub 2024 May 27.
4
Acute kidney injury and 1-year mortality after left ventricular assist device implantation.左心室辅助装置植入术后急性肾损伤与 1 年死亡率。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Jan;37(1):116-123. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
5
Risk of Renal Dysfunction Following Heart Transplantation in Patients Bridged with a Left Ventricular Assist Device.左心室辅助装置桥接的心脏移植患者肾功能障碍的风险。
ASAIO J. 2022 May 1;68(5):646-653. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001558. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
6
Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy in patients with preoperative hepatic failure: are we pushing the limits too far?术前肝功能衰竭患者的连续流左心室辅助装置治疗:我们是否走得太远了?
Artif Organs. 2015 Apr;39(4):336-42. doi: 10.1111/aor.12375. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
7
Impact of chronic kidney disease on in-hospital outcomes following left ventricular assist device placement: A national perspective.慢性肾脏病对左心室辅助装置植入术后住院结局的影响:国家视角。
Heart Lung. 2020 Jan-Feb;49(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2019.05.013. Epub 2019 May 29.
8
Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Kidney Injury Outcomes Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant.左心室辅助装置植入术后慢性肾脏病和急性肾损伤的预后
Cureus. 2020 Apr 18;12(4):e7725. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7725.
9
Left Ventricular Assist Devices, Kidney Disease, and Dialysis.左心室辅助装置、肾脏疾病和透析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Feb;71(2):257-266. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.09.019. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
Changes in renal function after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.植入左心室辅助装置后肾功能的变化。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 3;59(1):26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.038.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease after left ventricular assist device placement.左心室辅助装置植入术后的急性肾损伤和慢性肾脏病
JTCVS Open. 2025 Apr 13;25:190-199. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2025.04.001. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
How to Enhance Cardiorenal Benefits in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure?如何增强慢性心力衰竭患者的心肾获益?
Int J Heart Fail. 2025 Apr 4;7(2):58-78. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2025.0004. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Outcomes of left ventricular assist device implantations at Karolinska University Hospital: A retrospective study.
卡罗林斯卡大学医院左心室辅助装置植入的结果:一项回顾性研究。
JHLT Open. 2024 Apr 8;4:100093. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100093. eCollection 2024 May.
4
The tacrolimus concentration-to-dose ratio is associated with kidney function in heart transplant recipients.他克莫司浓度与剂量之比与心脏移植受者的肾功能相关。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Aug;91(8):2363-2377. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70041. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
5
Differential utilization of Impella devices, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and combined therapies as escalation and de-escalation strategies.作为升级和降级策略,Impella设备、体外膜肺氧合及联合治疗的差异化应用
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2023 Dec 13;25(Suppl I):I32-I38. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad131. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Major adverse kidney events predict reduced survival in ventricular assist device supported patients.主要不良肾脏事件预测心室辅助装置支持患者生存率降低。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Dec;10(6):3463-3471. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14533. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
7
Drugs that slow the progression of diabetic kidney disease: are renoprotective effects attenuated in heart failure?延缓糖尿病肾病进展的药物:其肾脏保护作用在心力衰竭中是否会减弱?
Eur Heart J. 2023 May 1;44(17):1522-1525. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad158.
8
Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Renal Ramifications.左心室辅助装置与肾脏影响
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 7;12(3):e028450. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.028450. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
9
Long-Term Changes in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Longitudinal Joint Model Analysis.左心室辅助装置受者估计肾小球滤过率的长期变化:纵向联合模型分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 7;12(3):e025993. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025993. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
10
Comparison of Evaluations for Heart Transplant Before Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device and Subsequent Receipt of Transplant at Transplant vs Nontransplant Centers.心脏移植前使用耐用性左心室辅助装置评估与在移植中心和非移植中心接受移植后的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2240646. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.40646.