Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China.
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, China.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jul;162(1):26-36.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.127. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
To further assess the early and mid-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) compared with those receiving best medical treatment (BMT).
Between February 2008 and March 2018, 357 consecutive patients with acute uncomplicated TBAD were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 191 patients underwent TEVAR, and 166 received BMT. After propensity score matching, we obtained 145 matched pairs for analysis.
In the matched population, the 30-day mortality between the TEVAR group and the BMT group showed no statistically significant difference, whereas the early adverse events rates in the TEVAR group were significantly greater than that of the BMT group (P = .003). Freedom from all-cause mortality in the TEVAR group was significantly greater than that of the BMT group (TEVAR: 91.9% at 5 years, BMT: 82.2% at 5 years, P = .028). Freedom from aortic-related mortality in the TEVAR group was significantly greater than that of the BMT group (TEVAR: 94.1% at 5 years, BMT: 86.1% at 5 years, P = .044). Multivariable Cox-hazard regression analysis demonstrated that the older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.08, P = .013), BMT (HR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.08-5.05, P = .032), and the distance between the primary entry tear and the left subclavian artery <2.0 cm (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.06-4.99, P = .035) were the significant risk factors for all-cause death. Given death as a competing factor, the cumulative incidence of rupture in the BMT group was significantly greater than that of the TEVAR group (BMT: 13.7% at 5 years, TEVAR: 5.1% at 5 years, P = .024).
Despite more complications in the early stage, TEVAR was associated with decreased risk of late death and had fewer late aortic ruptures compared with BMT in patients with acute uncomplicated TBAD. Therefore, TEVAR may be considered as the first option to improve the late outcomes in these patients.
与接受最佳药物治疗(BMT)的患者相比,进一步评估急性非复杂性 B 型主动脉夹层(TBAD)患者行胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)的早期和中期结局。
回顾性分析 2008 年 2 月至 2018 年 3 月期间 357 例急性非复杂性 TBAD 连续患者。其中,191 例行 TEVAR,166 例行 BMT。行倾向性评分匹配后,我们获得了 145 对匹配的患者进行分析。
在匹配人群中,TEVAR 组和 BMT 组 30 天死亡率无统计学差异,但 TEVAR 组早期不良事件发生率明显高于 BMT 组(P=0.003)。TEVAR 组全因死亡率明显高于 BMT 组(TEVAR:5 年时 91.9%,BMT:5 年时 82.2%,P=0.028)。TEVAR 组主动脉相关死亡率明显高于 BMT 组(TEVAR:5 年时 94.1%,BMT:5 年时 86.1%,P=0.044)。多变量 Cox 风险回归分析表明,年龄较大(风险比[HR],1.04;95%置信区间[CI],1.01-1.08,P=0.013)、接受 BMT(HR,2.33;95%CI,1.08-5.05,P=0.032)和原发破口至左锁骨下动脉距离<2.0cm(HR,2.30;95%CI,1.06-4.99,P=0.035)是全因死亡的显著危险因素。考虑到死亡是一个竞争因素,BMT 组的破裂累积发生率明显高于 TEVAR 组(BMT:5 年时 13.7%,TEVAR:5 年时 5.1%,P=0.024)。
与 BMT 相比,急性非复杂性 TBAD 患者行 TEVAR 术早期并发症较多,但晚期死亡风险较低,晚期主动脉破裂较少。因此,TEVAR 可作为改善此类患者晚期结局的首选方法。