• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可持续回收和废物管理政策的经济价值:以韩国的一次废物管理危机为例。

The economic value of sustainable recycling and waste management policies: The case of a waste management crisis in South Korea.

机构信息

Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin, Gyeonggi 17104, South Korea.

Korea Environment Institute, 370, Sicheong-daero, Sejong 30147, South Korea.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2020 Mar 1;104:220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.020
PMID:31982785
Abstract

The price of recyclable waste has declined, and China is refusing solid waste imports. As a result, recycling companies in South Korea are refusing to collect recyclable waste, which caused a solid waste management crisis in April 2018. Due to this crisis, many people are unable to discard their recyclable waste. This study aims to assess the economic value of a sustainable recycling and waste management policy to solve the waste management crisis. The analysis in this study is divided into two parts: The first part estimates the inconvenience costs to residents using a contingent valuation method, whereas the second part analyzes the preferences for a new policy using a mixed logit model with a choice experiment. The results show that mean willingness to pay (WTP) per household is 41,234 (USD 36.96) KRW/year; the total WTP would be able to increase the total disposal capacity by up to 4.51%. In addition, at an adequate price level for the policy alternative, the policy acceptance rate suggests that the price of biodegradable volume-rate disposal bags should increase by no more than KRW 66 (USD 0.06) per bag. This study provides guidance to policy makers who wish to consider both validity and acceptability.

摘要

可回收废物的价格下降了,中国也拒绝进口固体废物。因此,韩国的回收公司拒绝收集可回收废物,这导致 2018 年 4 月出现了固体废物管理危机。由于这场危机,许多人无法处理他们的可回收废物。本研究旨在评估可持续回收和废物管理政策的经济价值,以解决废物管理危机。本研究的分析分为两部分:第一部分使用意愿调查法估计对居民造成的不便成本;第二部分使用带有选择实验的混合 logit 模型分析对新政策的偏好。结果表明,每户家庭的平均支付意愿 (WTP) 为 41234 韩元(36.96 美元)/年;总 WTP 最多可将总处理能力提高 4.51%。此外,在政策替代方案的合理价格水平下,政策接受率表明可生物降解体积率处理袋的价格每袋应增加不超过 66 韩元(0.06 美元)。本研究为希望同时考虑有效性和可接受性的政策制定者提供了指导。

相似文献

1
The economic value of sustainable recycling and waste management policies: The case of a waste management crisis in South Korea.可持续回收和废物管理政策的经济价值:以韩国的一次废物管理危机为例。
Waste Manag. 2020 Mar 1;104:220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Estimation of willingness-to-pay for the MSW disposal system by choice experiment approach: A case study of Taiwan.采用选择实验法估算 MSW 处理系统的支付意愿:以台湾为例。
Waste Manag Res. 2019 Apr;37(4):365-373. doi: 10.1177/0734242X19826327. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
3
Factors influencing the citizen cost burden in managing the volume-based waste fee system in South Korea.影响韩国按体积计费制垃圾收费制度中公民费用负担的因素。
Waste Manag. 2018 Dec;82:285-291. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
4
Enhancing municipal solid waste recycling through reorganizing waste pickers: A case study in Nanjing, China.通过重新组织拾荒者来加强城市固体废物回收利用:中国南京的案例研究。
Waste Manag Res. 2018 Sep;36(9):767-778. doi: 10.1177/0734242X18766216. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
5
Factors that affect the willingness of residents to pay for solid waste management in Hong Kong.影响香港居民支付固体废物管理意愿的因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Mar;25(8):7504-7517. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1009-8. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
6
Measuring the Economic Value of the Negative Externality of Livestock Malodor in South Korea.测量韩国畜牧业恶臭负外部性的经济价值。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 2;19(15):9475. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159475.
7
Analyzing the success of the volume-based waste fee system in South Korea.分析韩国基于量的垃圾收费系统的成效。
Waste Manag. 2015 Sep;43:533-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
8
Willingness to pay for solid waste management improvement in Hawassa city, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚 Hawassa 市改善固体废物管理的支付意愿。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 15;302(Pt A):113973. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113973. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
9
Simulating the Effect of Mixed Subsidy Policies on Urban Low-Value Recyclable Waste in China: A System Dynamics Approach.运用系统动力学方法模拟中国混合补贴政策对城市低值可回收废物的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;18(20):10636. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010636.
10
Factors influencing the recycling rate under the volume-based waste fee system in South Korea.韩国基于体积的垃圾收费制度下影响回收率的因素。
Waste Manag. 2018 Apr;74:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Waste metrics in the framework of circular economy.循环经济框架中的废物指标。
Waste Manag Res. 2023 Dec;41(12):1741-1753. doi: 10.1177/0734242X231190794. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
2
A hybrid machine learning-mathematical programming optimization approach for municipal solid waste management during the pandemic.一种用于疫情期间城市固体废物管理的混合机器学习-数学规划优化方法。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2023 May 13:1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03354-2.
3
Geopolymer-Based Artificial Aggregates: A Review on Methods of Producing, Properties, and Improving Techniques.
基于地质聚合物的人工骨料:生产方法、性能及改进技术综述
Materials (Basel). 2022 Aug 11;15(16):5516. doi: 10.3390/ma15165516.
4
Optimal waste management during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的最佳废物管理
Chem Eng Process. 2022 Jun;176:108942. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2022.108942. Epub 2022 Apr 21.