Meyer Alexander, Huebner Viola, Lang Werner, Almasi-Sperling Veronika, Rother Ulrich
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Vasa. 2020 Apr;49(3):225-229. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000849. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
: Morbidity, lesion pattern, management and short-term outcomes of civilian vascular trauma are rarely evaluated. Therefore, analysis of in hospital results in patients with non-iatrogenic vascular trauma in a tertiary referral hospital was performed. : Retrospective evaluation of patients with vascular trauma from 2007-2017 was done. 48 patients (34 male, 14 females, mean age 56 years) were included. Excluded were patients with iatrogenic vascular complications. Major cause of vascular trauma were traffic accidents in 43.8 %, fall from great heights in 27.1 %, sport and home related injuries in 16.8 %, suicidal injuries in 4.2 % and gunshot wounds in 2.1 % (other 6.3 %). 60.4 % of patients presented with blunt, 39.6 % of patients with penetrating vascular trauma. More than half of the cases included polytraumatized patients (54.4 %). : Most commonly affected were the popliteal (25.0 %) and the axillar artery (18.8 %). Aortic injuries were present in 14.6 % of cases, whereas the femoral and subclavian artery were involved in 12.6 % and 10.4 %. Vascular reconstruction was performed by interposition graft in 45.9 %, direct suture in 18.8 %, patchplasty in 10.4 %, ligation in 12.4 %, and implantation of stentgraft in 12.5 %. Postoperative complication rate was 54.2 %. Rate of in-hospital major amputation was 14.6 % and in-hospital mortality was 14.6 % as well. Comparison between blunt and penetrating trauma as to postoperative complication (p = 0.322), blood transfusion (p = 0.452) and amputation (p = 0.304) showed no significant differences, whereas lethality in blunt trauma was 20.6 % vs. 5.2 % in penetrating trauma. Injury severity score (ISS) was significantly elevated for blunt trauma patients (mean ISS Score blunt 32 vs 21 penetrating, p = 0.043). : The majority of vascular lesions is caused by blunt trauma. Blunt lesions do also show a severe injury pattern, compared to penetrating trauma, and the complication rate remains high. However, by means of vascular reconstruction, limb salvage is feasible in a high percentage of cases.
民用血管创伤的发病率、损伤模式、治疗方法及短期预后很少得到评估。因此,我们对一家三级转诊医院中患有非医源性血管创伤患者的住院治疗结果进行了分析。
对2007年至2017年期间的血管创伤患者进行了回顾性评估。共纳入48例患者(男性34例,女性14例,平均年龄56岁)。排除医源性血管并发症患者。血管创伤的主要原因包括交通事故(43.8%)、高处坠落(27.1%)、运动及家庭相关损伤(16.8%)、自杀伤(4.2%)和枪伤(2.1%)(其他原因占6.3%)。60.4%的患者为钝性创伤,39.6%的患者为穿透性血管创伤。超过半数的病例为多发伤患者(54.4%)。
最常受累的血管是腘动脉(25.0%)和腋动脉(18.8%)。14.6%的病例存在主动脉损伤,股动脉和锁骨下动脉损伤分别占12.6%和10.4%。血管重建的方法包括:间置移植(45.9%)、直接缝合(18.8%)、补片成形术(10.4%)、结扎(12.4%)和支架植入(12.5%)。术后并发症发生率为54.2%。院内大截肢率和院内死亡率均为14.6%。钝性创伤和穿透性创伤在术后并发症(p = 0.322)、输血(p = 0.452)和截肢(p = 0.304)方面的比较显示无显著差异,而钝性创伤的致死率为20.6%,穿透性创伤为5.2%。钝性创伤患者的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)显著升高(钝性创伤患者平均ISS评分为32分,穿透性创伤患者为21分,p = 0.043)。
大多数血管损伤由钝性创伤引起。与穿透性创伤相比,钝性损伤也呈现出严重的损伤模式,且并发症发生率仍然很高。然而,通过血管重建,在大多数情况下保肢是可行的。