Chichester Institute of Sport, University of Chichester, Chichester, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
J Biomech. 2020 Mar 5;101:109639. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109639. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
Biomechanical motion data involving impacts are not adequately represented using conventional low-pass filters (CF). Time-frequency filters (TFF) are a viable alternative, but have been largely overlooked by movement scientists. We modified Georgakis and Subramaniam's (2009) fractional Fourier filter (MFrFF) and demonstrated it performed better than CFs for obtaining lower leg accelerations during football instep kicking. The MFrFF displayed peak marker accelerations comparable to a reference accelerometer during foot-to-ball impact (peak % error = -5.0 ± 11.4%), whereas CFs severely underestimated these peaks (30-70% error). During the non-impact phases, the MFrFF performed comparably to CFs using an appropriate (12-20 Hz) cut-off frequency (RMSE = 37.3 ± 7.6 m/s vs. 42.1 ± 11.4 m/s, respectively). Since accuracy of segmental kinematics is fundamental for understanding human movement, the MFrFF should be applied to a range of biomechanical impact scenarios (e.g. locomotion, landing and striking motions) to enhance the efficacy of study in these areas.
生物力学运动数据涉及冲击,使用传统的低通滤波器(CF)不能充分表示。时频滤波器(TFF)是一种可行的替代方法,但运动科学家在很大程度上忽略了它。我们修改了 Georgakis 和 Subramaniam(2009)的分数傅里叶滤波器(MFrFF),并证明它在获取足球正脚背踢球时小腿加速度方面比 CF 表现更好。在球与脚的冲击期间,MFrFF 显示出与参考加速度计相当的峰值标记加速度(峰值 %误差= -5.0 ± 11.4%),而 CF 则严重低估了这些峰值(30-70%误差)。在非冲击阶段,使用适当的(12-20 Hz)截止频率,MFrFF 的性能与 CFs 相当(RMSE = 37.3 ± 7.6 m/s 与 42.1 ± 11.4 m/s 相比)。由于节段运动学的准确性对于理解人体运动至关重要,因此应该将 MFrFF 应用于一系列生物力学冲击场景(例如,运动、着陆和击打运动),以提高这些领域研究的效果。