• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用三维测量对肩盂骨缺损进行自动定量评估。

Automated quantification of glenoid bone defects using 3-dimensional measurements.

机构信息

Biomechanics Section, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Materialise, Leuven, Belgium.

Orthopaedics Section, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 May;29(5):1050-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.007. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.007
PMID:31983533
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessment of glenoid bone defects is important to select the optimal glenoid component design during shoulder arthroplasty planning and implantation. This study presents a fully automated method to describe glenoid bone loss using 3-dimensional measurements without the need for a healthy contralateral reference scapula.

METHODS

The native shape of the glenoid is reconstructed by fitting a statistical shape model (SSM) of the scapula. The total vault loss percentage, local vault loss percentages, defect depth, defect area percentage, and subluxation distance and region are computed based on a comparison of the reconstructed and eroded glenoids. The method is evaluated by comparing its results with a contralateral bone-based reconstruction approach in a data set of 34 scapula and humerus pairs with unilateral glenoid bone defects.

RESULTS

The SSM-based defect measurements deviated from the contralateral bone-based measurements with mean absolute differences of 5.5% in the total vault loss percentage, 4.5% to 8.0% in the local vault loss percentages, 1.9 mm in the defect depth, 14.8% in the defect area percentage, and 1.6 mm in the subluxation distance. The SSM-based method was statistically equivalent to the contralateral bone-based method for all parameters except the defect area percentage.

CONCLUSION

The presented method is able to automatically analyze glenoid bone defects using 3-dimensional measurements without the need for a healthy contralateral bone.

摘要

背景

在肩关节置换手术规划和植入过程中,评估肩胛骨关节盂骨缺损对于选择最佳的关节盂假体设计非常重要。本研究提出了一种全自动的方法,通过使用三维测量来描述肩胛骨关节盂骨丢失,而无需健康的对侧参考肩胛骨。

方法

通过拟合肩胛骨的统计形状模型(SSM)来重建关节盂的原始形状。根据重建和侵蚀的关节盂之间的比较,计算总穹顶丢失百分比、局部穹顶丢失百分比、缺损深度、缺损面积百分比、半脱位距离和区域。该方法通过与单侧肩胛骨关节盂骨缺损的 34 对肩胛骨和肱骨数据集的对侧骨基重建方法进行比较来进行评估。

结果

SSM 基于的缺陷测量值与对侧骨基测量值存在差异,总穹顶丢失百分比的平均绝对差异为 5.5%,局部穹顶丢失百分比的平均绝对差异为 4.5%至 8.0%,缺损深度的平均绝对差异为 1.9 毫米,缺损面积百分比的平均绝对差异为 14.8%,半脱位距离的平均绝对差异为 1.6 毫米。除了缺损面积百分比外,SSM 基于的方法在所有参数上均与对侧骨基方法统计学等效。

结论

该方法能够使用三维测量自动分析肩胛骨关节盂骨缺损,而无需健康的对侧骨。

相似文献

1
Automated quantification of glenoid bone defects using 3-dimensional measurements.使用三维测量对肩盂骨缺损进行自动定量评估。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 May;29(5):1050-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.007. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Analysis of Agreement Between Computed Tomography Measurements of Glenoid Bone Defects in Anterior Shoulder Instability With and Without Comparison With the Contralateral Shoulder.前肩不稳中肩胛盂骨缺损的计算机断层扫描测量结果一致性分析:有无对侧肩比较的情况
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2918-26. doi: 10.1177/0363546515608167. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
3
A scapular statistical shape model can reliably predict premorbid glenoid morphology in conditions of severe glenoid bone loss.肩胛统计形状模型可在严重肩胛盂骨丢失的情况下可靠地预测术前肩胛盂形态。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Nov;33(11):2493-2504. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.060. Epub 2024 May 16.
4
Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography.即使使用三维计算机断层扫描,使用“最佳拟合圆”方法的圆大小和骨丢失宽度的共识仍然不足。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Oct;27(10):3222-3229. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05391-9. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
5
Virtual reconstruction of glenoid bone defects using a statistical shape model.利用统计形状模型进行肩胛盂骨缺损的虚拟重建。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jan;27(1):160-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.026. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
6
Radiographic characterization of the B2 glenoid: the effect of computed tomographic axis orientation.B2型肩胛盂的影像学特征:计算机断层扫描轴位方向的影响
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Feb;26(2):258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
Characterization of Posterior Glenoid Bone Loss Morphology in Patients With Posterior Shoulder Instability.探讨肩关节后向不稳患者后盂肱骨缺损形态特征。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Oct;35(10):2777-2784. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
8
A statistical shape model to predict the premorbid glenoid cavity.用于预测术前肩胛盂窝的统计形状模型。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Oct;27(10):1800-1808. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
9
Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fast Field Echo Resembling a Computed Tomography Using Restricted Echo-Spacing Sequence Is Equivalent to 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography in Quantifying Bone Loss and Measuring Shoulder Morphology in Patients With Shoulder Dislocation.三维磁共振成像快速场回波采用限制回波间距序列类似于 CT 定量检测肩关节脱位患者骨丢失和测量肩部形态的研究
Arthroscopy. 2024 Jun;40(6):1777-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.016. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
10
Statistical shape models that predict native glenoid width based on glenoid height are inaccurate in their current form: a cross-sectional study.基于肩胛盂高度预测固有肩胛盂宽度的统计形状模型目前并不准确:一项横断面研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Sep;33(9):2057-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.039. Epub 2024 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Serial 3D CT analysis of humeral head alignment in relation to glenoid correction and outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.全肩关节置换术后肱骨头对线与关节盂矫正及疗效关系的连续三维CT分析
JSES Int. 2023 Mar 7;7(3):485-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.007. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Glenoid Inclination: Choosing the Transverse Axis Is Critical-A 3D Automated versus Manually Measured Study.肩胛盂倾斜度:选择横轴至关重要——一项三维自动测量与手动测量的研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 13;11(20):6050. doi: 10.3390/jcm11206050.
3
Accurate reconstructions of pelvic defects and discontinuities using statistical shape models.
使用统计形状模型对骨盆缺损和不连续进行精确重建。
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Oct;23(13):1026-1033. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1784404. Epub 2020 Jul 3.