Bredhold Benjamin E, Winters Shauna D, Callison John C, Heidel Robert E, Allen Lauren M, Hamilton Leslie A
The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.
The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Hosp Pharm. 2020 Feb;55(1):26-31. doi: 10.1177/0018578718817469. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
Septic shock is a serious medical condition affecting millions of people each year and guidelines direct vasopressor use in these patients. However, there is little information as to which vasopressor should be discontinued first. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the sequence of norepinephrine and vasopressin discontinuation on intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted at The University of Tennessee Medical Center in Knoxville, Tennessee. Patients included in this study were adults 18 years of age and older with a diagnosis of septic shock who received norepinephrine in combination with vasopressin. Patients were excluded if norepinephrine or vasopressin were not the last 2 vasoactive agents used or if the patient expired or care was withdrawn. A total of 86 patients were included in this study, with 34 patients in the norepinephrine discontinued first group (NDF) and 52 in the vasopressin discontinued first group (VDF). For the primary outcome of ICU length of stay, no statistically significant difference was found between the NDF and the VDF groups (9.38 days vs 11.07 days, = .313). The secondary outcome of the dose of norepinephrine at which vasopressin was initiated was also found to not be significant between the NDF and VDF groups (22 µg/min vs 31.1 µg/min, = .11). The rates of hypotension within 24 hours of discontinuation of the first agent were also not significant between the NDF and VDF groups (17% vs 31%, = .38). Based on the results of this study, there was significant no difference in ICU length of stay based on the sequence of discontinuation between norepinephrine and vasopressin in patients recovering from septic shock.
感染性休克是一种严重的医学病症,每年影响数百万人,相关指南指导这些患者使用血管活性药物。然而,关于首先停用哪种血管活性药物的信息却很少。本研究的目的是评估去甲肾上腺素和血管加压素停药顺序对重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间的影响。这是一项在田纳西州诺克斯维尔的田纳西大学医学中心进行的单中心回顾性队列研究。本研究纳入的患者为18岁及以上诊断为感染性休克且接受去甲肾上腺素联合血管加压素治疗的成年人。如果去甲肾上腺素或血管加压素不是最后使用的两种血管活性药物,或者患者死亡或停止治疗,则将患者排除。本研究共纳入86例患者,其中34例患者属于先停用去甲肾上腺素组(NDF),52例属于先停用血管加压素组(VDF)。对于ICU住院时间这一主要结局,NDF组和VDF组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(9.38天对11.07天,P = 0.313)。在NDF组和VDF组之间,启动血管加压素时的去甲肾上腺素剂量这一次要结局也未发现显著差异(22微克/分钟对31.1微克/分钟,P = 0.11)。在停用第一种药物后24小时内的低血压发生率在NDF组和VDF组之间也无显著差异(17%对31%,P = 0.38)。基于本研究结果,感染性休克康复患者中,根据去甲肾上腺素和血管加压素的停药顺序,ICU住院时间无显著差异。