Suppr超能文献

心理健康与刑事指控:澳大利亚转处途径的差异

Mental Health and Criminal Charges: Variation in Diversion Pathways in Australia.

作者信息

Davidson Fiona, Heffernan Edward, Greenberg David, Waterworth Rhondda, Burgess Philip

机构信息

NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Offender Health, Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Australia.

School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Jun 6;24(6):888-898. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1327305. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Mental health and criminal justice legislation must provide the appropriate mechanisms for ensuring the assessment and care of mentally ill individuals. It must also balance the right to justice of these individuals with the rights of the community. In Australia, each jurisdiction has its own legislative provisions related to mental health, criminal legislation and sentencing, with variation in the mental health diversion options that are available. This article uses a national survey of court liaison services and mental health courts in Australia and a review of the relevant legislative frameworks to compare jurisdictional approaches to mental health diversion. Despite calls from the National Mental Health Commission for consistency, the Australian approach to the provision of mental health services to people in the criminal justice system is heterogeneous and piecemeal. Variation in the diversion pathways available to individuals with mental illness exists across Australia. The presence of problem-solving courts in some, but not all, jurisdictions results in differences in access to legal and treatment options.

摘要

精神卫生与刑事司法立法必须提供适当机制,以确保对精神病患者的评估与护理。它还必须在这些人的司法权利与社区权利之间取得平衡。在澳大利亚,每个司法管辖区都有其自身与精神卫生、刑事立法及量刑相关的法律规定,在可用的精神卫生转处选项方面存在差异。本文通过对澳大利亚法院联络服务和精神卫生法庭的全国性调查以及对相关立法框架的审查,来比较各司法管辖区在精神卫生转处方面的做法。尽管国家精神卫生委员会呼吁保持一致性,但澳大利亚向刑事司法系统中的人提供精神卫生服务的方式是多样且零散的。澳大利亚各地,为患有精神疾病的个人提供的转处途径存在差异。一些(但并非所有)司法管辖区设有问题解决法庭,这导致在获得法律和治疗选项方面存在差异。

相似文献

1
Mental Health and Criminal Charges: Variation in Diversion Pathways in Australia.心理健康与刑事指控:澳大利亚转处途径的差异
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Jun 6;24(6):888-898. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1327305. eCollection 2017.
3
New justice system responses to mentally impaired defendants in New Zealand.新西兰针对精神受损被告的新司法系统应对措施。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Jul 13;29(4):549-562. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1938275. eCollection 2022.
6
Court diversion in perspective.透视下的法庭分流。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun-Jul;40(6-7):529-38. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01835.x.
10
Diversion down under - Programs for offenders with mental illnesses in Australia.转移到澳大利亚——针对有精神疾病罪犯的项目。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Sep-Oct;33(4):249-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Who gets diverted into treatment? a study of defendants with psychosis.哪些人被转入治疗?一项针对患有精神病的被告的研究。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Apr 26;31(1):132-145. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2175070. eCollection 2024.
2
A comparison of older and younger offenders with delusional jealousy.患有妄想性嫉妒的老年和年轻罪犯的比较。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Jul 26;30(5):618-631. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2022.2073285. eCollection 2023.
3
New justice system responses to mentally impaired defendants in New Zealand.新西兰针对精神受损被告的新司法系统应对措施。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Jul 13;29(4):549-562. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1938275. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

5
Diversion down under - Programs for offenders with mental illnesses in Australia.转移到澳大利亚——针对有精神疾病罪犯的项目。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2010 Sep-Oct;33(4):249-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
6
Prisons: mental health institutions of the 21st century?监狱:21世纪的精神卫生机构?
Med J Aust. 2006 Sep 18;185(6):302-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00581.x.
7
Court diversion in perspective.透视下的法庭分流。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun-Jul;40(6-7):529-38. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01835.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验