Howard Abigail, Flanagan Mindy, Drouin Michelle, Carpenter Maria, Chen Elizabeth M, Duchovic Catherine, Toscos Tammy
Parkview Research Center, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA.
Indiana University Center for Health Services Research, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
JAMIA Open. 2018 Apr 20;1(1):67-74. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy002. eCollection 2018 Jul.
Our objectives were to measure experts' opinions and develop consensus via the Delphi process on the barriers, applications, and concerns associated with telemental health (TMH) for youth.
We delivered 3 online surveys over 2 months in Summer, 2016-2025 adult experts, including adults who experienced youth depression or suicidality, parents of youth with lived experience, and professionals (ie youth mental health researchers, clinicians/staff, or educators). We used the Delphi method to construct Likert and open-ended questions, developing expert consensus over 3 iterative surveys on the barriers and benefits of TMH for youth.
Adult experts identified stigma and knowledge barriers to youth mental health care. Although TMH is perceived as beneficial for screening, education, follow-up, and emotional support, no single delivery method (eg websites or instant messaging) was deemed universally beneficial.
Adults are the developers, administrators, and gatekeepers of youth mental health care. Although adult experts see potential for TMH to supplement traditional therapy via familiar technologies, there is no consensus on the technologies by which TMH should be delivered. However, there is consensus that family members and friends provide potential pathways to care; thus, an online TMH toolkit for youth would be beneficial for both caretakers and practitioners.
Telemental health may not overcome barriers for crisis management but adult experts agreed that TMH had potential benefits for youth. Health care organizations should conduct research and provide training and education to youth caretakers and practitioners on potential barriers and benefits of TMH technologies for youth.
我们的目标是通过德尔菲法衡量专家意见,并就与青少年远程心理健康(TMH)相关的障碍、应用和担忧达成共识。
在2016年夏季的2个月内,我们向25名成年专家开展了3次在线调查,这些专家包括曾经历过青少年抑郁或自杀行为的成年人、有实际经历的青少年的父母以及专业人士(即青少年心理健康研究人员、临床医生/工作人员或教育工作者)。我们使用德尔菲法构建李克特量表和开放式问题,通过3次迭代调查就TMH对青少年的障碍和益处达成专家共识。
成年专家确定了青少年心理健康护理中的耻辱感和知识障碍。尽管TMH被认为对筛查、教育、随访和情感支持有益,但没有一种单一的提供方式(如网站或即时通讯)被认为普遍有益。
成年人是青少年心理健康护理的开发者、管理者和把关人。尽管成年专家认为TMH有潜力通过熟悉的技术补充传统治疗,但对于应通过何种技术提供TMH尚未达成共识。然而,大家一致认为家庭成员和朋友提供了潜在的护理途径;因此,一个针对青少年的在线TMH工具包对照顾者和从业者都将是有益的。
远程心理健康可能无法克服危机管理中的障碍,但成年专家一致认为TMH对青少年有潜在益处。医疗保健组织应开展研究,并就TMH技术对青少年的潜在障碍和益处,为青少年照顾者和从业者提供培训和教育。