Suppr超能文献

经导管主动脉瓣置换术后持续性新发左束支传导阻滞患者的单中心队列和短期随访。

A single-centre cohort and short-term follow-up of patients who developed persistent new onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol. 2020 Aug;75(4):360-365. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2020.1713520. Epub 2020 Jan 26.

Abstract

The most common conduction abnormality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) with an exact frequency that varies based on the valve system used for TAVR. PPM implantation in patients with persistent new onset LBBB post TAVR is controversial. The primary objective of this study is to report PPM utilisation and mortality in this patient population. A TAVR registry included patients older than 18 years who underwent TAVR between March 2012 and June 2015 at University of Minnesota Medical Centre. After exclusion, 151 patients were divided into two groups; patients with persistent new onset LBBB after TAVR (new LBBB,  = 47) and patients without persistent new onset LBBB (no new LBBB,  = 104). Among the 151 patients, 47 (31.1%) patients developed new-onset LBBB after the procedure and persisted at discharge. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (52.5 ± 11.1 vs. 56.4 ± 10.8, : .047) and mean aortic valve gradient (40.6 ± 11.5 vs. 45.7 ± 14.1, : .022) were significantly higher in no new LBBB group. Among those with new LBBB, there was a significantly higher rate of PPM implant during index hospitalisation (14.9%, vs. 0%,  < .001). LVEF remained significantly lower at 1 year follow up in new LBBB group compared to no new LBBB group (51.8 ± 11.2 vs. 57.6 ± 8.3, 002). Also in new LBBB group, there was a non-significantly higher rate of all-cause mortality in 1 year compared to no new LBBB group (14.9% vs. 9.6% : .34). There were no significant differences between patients with and without new LBBB with respect to PPM implant after discharge in 1 year (2.13% vs. 3.8% : .58), length of stay (7.3 ± 7.3 vs. 5.9 ± 2.7 : .09), post-op atrial fibrillation (AF) (16.3% vs. 8.5% : .20). New onset LBBB was frequent conduction problem post TAVR and one-third of patients with new onset LBBB persisted at discharge. New LBBB after TAVR was associated with a higher risk of PPM implantation during the index hospitalisation but not after discharge. Our findings suggest that early PPM implantation for post-TAVR LBBB is not indicated without complete or high degree AV block. Further research is required to identify the patients with new LBBB who would progress to advanced AV block or heart failure.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后最常见的传导异常是新发左束支传导阻滞(LBBB),其确切频率因 TAVR 所用瓣膜系统而异。在 TAVR 后持续新发 LBBB 的患者中,植入永久性起搏器(PPM)存在争议。本研究的主要目的是报告该患者人群中 PPM 的使用情况和死亡率。一项 TAVR 登记研究纳入了 2012 年 3 月至 2015 年 6 月在明尼苏达大学医学中心接受 TAVR 的年龄大于 18 岁的患者。排除后,151 例患者分为两组;TAVR 后持续新发 LBBB 的患者(新发 LBBB,n=47)和无持续新发 LBBB 的患者(无新发 LBBB,n=104)。在 151 例患者中,47 例(31.1%)患者在术后出现新发 LBBB 并在出院时持续存在。无新发 LBBB 组的左心室射血分数(LVEF)(52.5±11.1 比 56.4±10.8,P=0.047)和平均主动脉瓣梯度(40.6±11.5 比 45.7±14.1,P=0.022)均显著较高。在新发 LBBB 患者中,指数住院期间 PPM 植入率显著较高(14.9%比 0%,P<0.001)。与无新发 LBBB 组相比,新发 LBBB 组在 1 年随访时 LVEF 仍显著较低(51.8±11.2 比 57.6±8.3,P=0.002)。在新发 LBBB 组中,1 年时全因死亡率也非显著较高(14.9%比 9.6%,P=0.34)。在 1 年时,新发 LBBB 患者与无新发 LBBB 患者在出院后植入 PPM 方面无显著差异(2.13%比 3.8%,P=0.58),住院时间(7.3±7.3 比 5.9±2.7,P=0.09),术后心房颤动(AF)(16.3%比 8.5%,P=0.20)。新发 LBBB 是 TAVR 后常见的传导问题,有三分之一的新发 LBBB 患者在出院时持续存在。TAVR 后新发 LBBB 与指数住院期间 PPM 植入风险较高相关,但与出院后无关。我们的研究结果表明,在没有完全或高度房室传导阻滞的情况下,不建议对 TAVR 后新发 LBBB 早期植入 PPM。需要进一步研究以确定哪些新发 LBBB 患者会进展为高级房室传导阻滞或心力衰竭。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验