• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于证据的自体乳房重建绩效评估指标:美国整形外科学会质量绩效评估指标集。

Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: An American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality Performance Measure Set.

机构信息

From Henry Ford Hospital; West Virginia University; University of Utah Health; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; PRMA Plastic Surgery; the American Society of Plastic Surgeons; Central Park South Plastic Surgery; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; South Bay Plastic Surgeons; the University of Vermont; LSU Health Sciences Center; the Breast Center of Southern Arizona; and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):284e-294e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006478.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006478
PMID:31985618
Abstract

The American Society of Plastic Surgeons commissioned the Autologous Breast Reconstruction Performance Measure Development Work Group to identify and draft quality measures for the care of patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction and other breast reconstruction surgery. Four outcome measures and one process measure were identified. Outcomes include patient satisfaction with information for all breast reconstruction, a subscale of the BREAST-Q, and the length of stay, operative time, and rate of blood transfusion for autologous blood transfusion. The process measure looks at coordination of care around managing the breast reconstruction patient's care, with the physician coordinating the ongoing care, be it an oncologist, radiologist, other specialist, or primary care physician. All measures in this report were approved by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality and Performance Measures Work Group and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Executive Committee. The Work Group recommends the use of these measures for quality initiatives, continuing medical education, maintenance of certification, American Society of Plastic Surgeons' Qualified Clinical Data Registry reporting, and national quality-reporting programs.

摘要

美国整形外科学会委托自体乳房重建绩效衡量制定工作组确定并起草用于自体乳房重建和其他乳房重建手术患者护理的质量衡量标准。工作组确定了四项结果衡量标准和一项流程衡量标准。结果衡量标准包括患者对所有乳房重建信息的满意度、BREAST-Q 子量表、自体输血的住院时间、手术时间和输血率。流程衡量标准关注围绕管理乳房重建患者护理的医疗协调情况,由医生协调持续护理,无论是肿瘤医生、放射科医生、其他专家还是初级保健医生。本报告中的所有衡量标准均获得美国整形外科学会质量和绩效衡量标准工作组以及美国整形外科学会执行委员会的批准。工作组建议将这些衡量标准用于质量计划、继续医学教育、维持认证、美国整形外科学会合格临床数据登记报告以及国家质量报告计划。

相似文献

1
Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: An American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality Performance Measure Set.基于证据的自体乳房重建绩效评估指标:美国整形外科学会质量绩效评估指标集。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):284e-294e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006478.
2
Evidence-Based Performance Measures: Quality Metrics for the Care of Patients Undergoing Breast Reconstruction.基于证据的绩效指标:乳房重建患者护理的质量指标
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6):775e-781e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003845.
3
Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Rhinoplasty: A Multidisciplinary Performance Measure Set.基于证据的隆鼻术绩效评估指标:多学科绩效评估指标集。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;147(2):222e-230e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007598.
4
Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Reconstruction after Skin Cancer Resection: A Multidisciplinary Performance Measure Set.基于证据的皮肤癌切除后重建的绩效评估指标:一个多学科的绩效评估指标集。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Feb 1;153(2):424e-441e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010916. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
5
Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.乳房重建的当前趋势:美国整形外科医师协会2010年调查
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Jan;70(1):103-10. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822ed5ce.
6
Lessons learned from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: has centralized data collection improved immediate breast reconstruction outcomes and safety?从美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库中吸取的教训:集中数据收集是否改善了即刻乳房重建的结果和安全性?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov;134(5):859-868. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000615.
7
Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: Autologous Breast Reconstruction with DIEP or Pedicled TRAM Abdominal Flaps.循证临床实践指南:采用腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣或带蒂横行腹直肌肌皮瓣进行自体乳房重建
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5):651e-664e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003768.
8
How Can We Improve Education of Breast Surgeons Across Europe?我们如何改善欧洲各地乳腺外科医生的教育?
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017 Jul-Aug;112(4):365-366. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.4.365.
9
Use of autologous and microsurgical breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons.美国整形医生使用自体和显微乳房重建术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep;132(3):534-541. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829ae03e.
10
Evidence-based medicine: breast reconstruction.循证医学:乳房重建。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1658-1669. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80836.

引用本文的文献

1
A Multi-institutional Analysis of a Textbook Outcome Among Patients Undergoing Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.多机构分析接受微血管乳房重建术患者的教科书式结局。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Jun 1;92(6S Suppl 4):S453-S460. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003950.
2
Textbook outcomes in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a Delphi study to establish consensus.腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术的教科书结局:一项建立共识的德尔菲研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Feb;197(3):559-568. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06820-z. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
3
Surgical and Patient Reported Outcomes After DIEP Breast Reconstruction at a Low-Volume Community Hospital Without Microvascular Fellowship Training.
低容量社区医院在未接受微血管 fellowship 培训情况下进行腹壁下动脉穿支乳房重建术后的手术及患者报告结局
Eplasty. 2021 Sep 29;21:e9. eCollection 2021.
4
Validation of Ideal Breast Characteristics With Breast Augmentation Patients.通过隆胸患者验证理想乳房特征
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022 Feb 5;4:ojac010. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojac010. eCollection 2022.
5
Public Perception of Ideal Breast Shape.公众对理想乳房形状的认知。
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2021 Nov 26;4:ojab049. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojab049. eCollection 2022.