FROM Research Foundation, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
Blood Adv. 2020 Jan 28;4(2):380-386. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001158.
Ruxolitinib is a recommended second-line treatment for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera who become resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea; however, evidence regarding its efficacy in terms of thrombosis reduction is uncertain. We searched Medline, Embase, and archives of abstracts from the European Hematology Association and the American Society of Hematology annual congresses from 2014 onward for randomized controlled trials comparing the treatment vs best available therapy (BAT). Our search retrieved 80 records; after screening of abstracts and full text, the total was reduced to 16. Evidence came from 4 randomized controlled trials, including 663 patients (1057 patients per year). We estimated a thrombosis risk ratio of 0.56 for ruxolitinib BAT, corresponding to an incidence of 3.09% and 5.51% patients per year, respectively. The number of thrombotic events reported with ruxolitinib was consistently lower than that with BAT in our sample, but, globally, the difference did not reach significance (P = .098). Hard evidence in favor of ruxolitinib is lacking; a clinical trial on selected patients at high risk of thrombosis would be warranted, but its feasibility is questionable.
芦可替尼是治疗对羟基脲耐药或不耐受的真性红细胞增多症患者血栓形成的推荐二线治疗药物;然而,其在降低血栓形成方面的疗效证据尚不确定。我们检索了 Medline、Embase 和 2014 年以来欧洲血液学协会和美国血液学会年会的摘要档案,以寻找比较治疗与最佳可用治疗(BAT)的随机对照试验。我们的检索共获得了 80 条记录;经过摘要和全文筛选,总数减少到 16 条。证据来自 4 项随机对照试验,共纳入 663 名患者(每年每 1057 名患者中有 1057 名患者)。我们估计芦可替尼 BAT 的血栓形成风险比为 0.56,相应的发生率分别为每年 3.09%和 5.51%。在我们的样本中,报告使用芦可替尼的血栓栓塞事件数量始终低于 BAT,但总体差异无统计学意义(P =.098)。缺乏支持芦可替尼的确凿证据;对高血栓形成风险的选定患者进行临床试验是合理的,但其实行性值得怀疑。