Dai Licong, Guo Xiaowei, Ke Xun, Lan Yuting, Zhang Fawei, Li Yikang, Lin Li, Li Qian, Cao Guangmin, Fan Bo, Qian Dawen, Zhou Huakun, Du Yangong
Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Restoration Ecology for Cold Region Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology Chinese Academy of Sciences Xining China.
Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology Chinese Academy of Sciences Xining China.
Ecol Evol. 2019 Dec 11;10(1):506-516. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5920. eCollection 2020 Jan.
Aboveground biomass (AGB) and belowground biomass (BGB) allocation and productivity-richness relationship are controversial. Here, we assessed AGB and BGB allocation and the productivity-richness relationship at community level across four grassland types based on the biomass data collected from 80 sites across the Qinghai Plateau during 2011-2012. The reduced major axis regression and general linear models were used and showed that (a) the median values of AGB were significantly higher in alpine meadow than in other three grassland types; the ratio of root to shoot (R/S) was significantly higher in desert grassland (36.06) than intemperate grassland (16.60), alpine meadow (13.35), and meadow steppe (19.46). The temperate grassland had deeper root distribution than the other three grasslands, with about 91.45% roots distributed in the top 30 cm soil layer. (b) The slopes between log AGB and log BGB in the temperate grassland and meadow steppe were 1.09 and 1, respectively, whereas that in the desert grassland was 1.12, which was significantly different from the isometric allocation relationship. A competitive relationship between AGB and BGB was observed in the alpine meadow with a slope of -1.83, indicating a trade-off between AGB and BGB in the alpine meadow. (c) A positive productivity-richness relationship existed across the four grassland types, suggesting that the positive productivity-richness relationship might not be affected by the environmental factors at the plant location. Our results provide a new insight for biomass allocation and biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research.
地上生物量(AGB)与地下生物量(BGB)的分配以及生产力与丰富度之间的关系存在争议。在此,我们基于2011 - 2012年期间从青藏高原80个样点收集的生物量数据,评估了四种草地类型群落水平上的AGB和BGB分配以及生产力与丰富度之间的关系。采用了主轴回归和一般线性模型,结果表明:(a)高寒草甸的AGB中位数显著高于其他三种草地类型;荒漠草地的根冠比(R/S)(36.06)显著高于温带草地(16.60)、高寒草甸(13.35)和草甸草原(19.46)。温带草地的根系分布比其他三种草地更深,约91.45%的根系分布在土壤表层30厘米土层内。(b)温带草地和草甸草原中log AGB与log BGB之间的斜率分别为1.09和1,而荒漠草地的斜率为1.12,这与等速分配关系显著不同。在高寒草甸中观察到AGB和BGB之间存在竞争关系,斜率为 - 1.83,表明高寒草甸中AGB和BGB之间存在权衡。(c)四种草地类型均存在生产力与丰富度的正相关关系,这表明生产力与丰富度的正相关关系可能不受植物生长地环境因素的影响。我们的研究结果为生物量分配以及生物多样性 - 生态系统功能研究提供了新的见解。