Jackson R B, Canadell J, Ehleringer J R, Mooney H A, Sala O E, Schulze E D
Department of Botany, University of Texas at Austin, 78713, Austin, TX, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA.
Oecologia. 1996 Nov;108(3):389-411. doi: 10.1007/BF00333714.
Understanding and predicting ecosystem functioning (e.g., carbon and water fluxes) and the role of soils in carbon storage requires an accurate assessment of plant rooting distributions. Here, in a comprehensive literature synthesis, we analyze rooting patterns for terrestrial biomes and compare distributions for various plant functional groups. We compiled a database of 250 root studies, subdividing suitable results into 11 biomes, and fitted the depth coefficient β to the data for each biome (Gale and Grigal 1987). β is a simple numerical index of rooting distribution based on the asymptotic equation Y=1-β, where d = depth and Y = the proportion of roots from the surface to depth d. High values of β correspond to a greater proportion of roots with depth. Tundra, boreal forest, and temperate grasslands showed the shallowest rooting profiles (β=0.913, 0.943, and 0.943, respectively), with 80-90% of roots in the top 30 cm of soil; deserts and temperate coniferous forests showed the deepest profiles (β=0.975 and 0.976, respectively) and had only 50% of their roots in the upper 30 cm. Standing root biomass varied by over an order of magnitude across biomes, from approximately 0.2 to 5 kg m. Tropical evergreen forests had the highest root biomass (5 kg m), but other forest biomes and sclerophyllous shrublands were of similar magnitude. Root biomass for croplands, deserts, tundra and grasslands was below 1.5 kg m. Root/shoot (R/S) ratios were highest for tundra, grasslands, and cold deserts (ranging from 4 to 7); forest ecosystems and croplands had the lowest R/S ratios (approximately 0.1 to 0.5). Comparing data across biomes for plant functional groups, grasses had 44% of their roots in the top 10 cm of soil. (β=0.952), while shrubs had only 21% in the same depth increment (β=0.978). The rooting distribution of all temperate and tropical trees was β=0.970 with 26% of roots in the top 10 cm and 60% in the top 30 cm. Overall, the globally averaged root distribution for all ecosystems was β=0.966 (r =0.89) with approximately 30%, 50%, and 75% of roots in the top 10 cm, 20 cm, and 40 cm, respectively. We discuss the merits and possible shortcomings of our analysis in the context of root biomass and root functioning.
了解和预测生态系统功能(如碳通量和水通量)以及土壤在碳储存中的作用,需要准确评估植物根系分布。在此,我们进行了一项全面的文献综合分析,剖析陆地生物群落的根系模式,并比较不同植物功能组的分布情况。我们编制了一个包含250项根系研究的数据库,将合适的结果细分为11个生物群落,并针对每个生物群落的数据拟合深度系数β(Gale和Grigal,1987年)。β是基于渐近方程Y = 1 - β的根系分布简单数值指标,其中d为深度,Y为从地表到深度d的根系比例。β值越高,根系随深度增加的比例越大。冻原、北方森林和温带草原的根系分布最浅(β分别为0.913、0.943和0.943),80 - 90%的根系分布在土壤表层30厘米内;沙漠和温带针叶林的根系分布最深(β分别为0.975和0.976),只有50%的根系分布在上层30厘米。不同生物群落的立根生物量相差一个数量级以上,从约0.2到5千克/平方米不等。热带常绿森林的根生物量最高(5千克/平方米),但其他森林生物群落和硬叶灌丛的根生物量与之相当。农田、沙漠、冻原和草原的根生物量低于1.5千克/平方米。冻原、草原和寒漠的根冠比(R/S)最高(范围为4至7);森林生态系统和农田的根冠比最低(约为0.1至0.5)。比较不同生物群落中植物功能组的数据,草本植物44%的根系分布在土壤表层10厘米内(β = 0.952),而灌木在相同深度增量内只有21%的根系分布在此处(β = 0.978)。所有温带和热带树木的根系分布β = 0.970,26%的根系分布在表层10厘米内,60%的根系分布在表层30厘米内。总体而言,所有生态系统的全球平均根系分布为β = 0.966(r = 0.89),分别约有30%、50%和75%的根系分布在表层10厘米、20厘米和40厘米内。我们在根生物量和根系功能的背景下讨论了分析的优点和可能存在的不足。