Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
J Med Econ. 2020 Jun;23(6):557-565. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1722677. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
Chronic diseases impose a substantial healthcare burden. This study sought to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of new disease management (DM) programs, targeting four major chronic disease groups: diabetes, coronary heart disease (CHD)/hypertension (HTN), asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and congestive heart failure (CHF)/chronic kidney disease (CKD). Between March 1, 2015, and February 28, 2018, members with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana insurance were contacted and enrolled in a DM program if they were aged 18 years through 64 years, eligible for a DM program, and had not been previously enrolled in a DM program. Active enrollees of a DM program ("IN" group) were compared to members who were not yet enrolled ("OUT" group). Average per member per month (PMPM) costs were aggregated annually to document any descriptive trends. Multivariable model estimates were used to compare PMPM costs for all IN subjects and all OUT subjects. Total medical savings were evaluated for the following time intervals: 1-12 months, 13-24 months, and 25-36 months. For all four DM programs, average costs PMPM trended upward over time for the OUT cohort, while they remained relatively stable for the IN cohort. Some evidence also showed that DM programs improved clinical outcomes, such as hemoglobin A1c values. A difference in difference analysis showed PMPM savings for all four programs combined of $31.61, $50.45, and $53.72 after 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Multivariable modeling results showed total savings after 3 years of $14,460,174 for all DM programs combined. Although multivariable models adjusted for several clinical, demographic, and economic characteristics; it is possible that some important confounders were missing due to lack of data. DM programs implemented to control diabetes, CHD/HTN, CHF/CKD, and asthma/COPD are cost-effective and show some evidence of improved clinical outcomes.
慢性病给医疗保健带来了巨大的负担。本研究旨在评估新的疾病管理(DM)计划对四大慢性疾病群体(糖尿病、冠心病/高血压(HTN)、哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和充血性心力衰竭(CHF)/慢性肾脏病(CKD))的临床和经济影响。在 2015 年 3 月 1 日至 2018 年 2 月 28 日期间,联系了路易斯安那州蓝十字蓝盾的会员,如果他们年龄在 18 岁至 64 岁之间,符合 DM 计划的条件,且之前未参加 DM 计划,则将其纳入 DM 计划。参加 DM 计划的活跃参与者(“IN”组)与尚未参加的成员(“OUT”组)进行比较。每年汇总每位会员每月(PMPM)的平均费用,以记录任何描述性趋势。使用多变量模型估计来比较所有 IN 受试者和所有 OUT 受试者的 PMPM 成本。评估以下时间段的总医疗储蓄:1-12 个月、13-24 个月和 25-36 个月。对于所有四个 DM 计划,随着时间的推移,OUT 队列的 PMPM 平均成本呈上升趋势,而 IN 队列的成本则相对稳定。一些证据还表明,DM 计划改善了临床结果,例如血红蛋白 A1c 值。差异分析显示,所有四个计划组合的 PMPM 节省分别为 31.61 美元、50.45 美元和 53.72 美元,分别在第 1、2 和 3 年。多变量模型分析结果显示,所有 DM 计划在第 3 年共节省 14460174 美元。尽管多变量模型调整了几个临床、人口统计学和经济特征,但由于数据不足,仍有可能存在一些重要的混杂因素。实施控制糖尿病、CHD/HTN、CHF/CKD 和哮喘/COPD 的 DM 计划是具有成本效益的,并显示出一些改善临床结果的证据。