Kim Randie H, Brinster Nooshin K
Assistant Professor, The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; and.
Associate Professor, The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Am J Dermatopathol. 2020 Feb;42(2):75-85. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000001516.
Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) remains a valuable tool that may be underused because of perceived challenges in the interpretation, limitations, and processing of DIF specimens. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for appropriately incorporating DIF in a variety of clinical diseases, such as autoimmune blistering disorders. In vasculitis, the role of DIF continues to evolve, particularly in the setting of IgA vasculitis. Although typically not indicated for the workup of connective tissue disease, DIF may be helpful in cases with negative serologies, nondiagnostic histologic findings, or scarring alopecia. Practical pearls for biopsy technique, specimen handling, and storage are also discussed.
直接免疫荧光法(DIF)仍然是一项有价值的工具,但由于在DIF标本的解读、局限性和处理方面存在可感知的挑战,它可能未得到充分利用。本综述的目的是提供一份实用指南,指导如何在各种临床疾病(如自身免疫性水疱病)中合理应用DIF。在血管炎中,DIF的作用不断演变,尤其是在IgA血管炎的情况下。虽然DIF通常不用于结缔组织病的检查,但在血清学检查结果为阴性、组织学检查结果无法诊断或瘢痕性脱发的病例中,DIF可能会有所帮助。本文还讨论了活检技术、标本处理和储存的实用技巧。