• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查脆弱老年人:重复入院概率量表是否为准确工具?

Screening for vulnerable older people: Is the Probability of Repeated Admission scale an accurate tool?

机构信息

Research Laboratory on Human Aging - GeronLab, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Department of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Apr;20(4):360-365. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13867. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1111/ggi.13867
PMID:31991044
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the Probability of Repeated Admission (Pra) scale performance in predicting healthcare utilization and death in a community sample of Rio de Janeiro city, Brazil.

METHODS

This was a prospective longitudinal study. The sample was composed of community-dwelling older people who participated in the research network Frailty in Brazilian Older People Study, Rio de Janeiro section. It analyzed data from the baseline and the follow up. At the baseline, 764 older adults were stratified by the Pra, and, 3 years later, data on health services utilization and survival status were collected. The Pra accuracy, obtained by the area under the curve, the sensitivity and the specificity to predict hospitalization in 3 years; visits to the emergency department; and death were determined. Cox regression estimated the survival curves, according to the risk strata.

RESULTS

The accuracy, the sensitivity and the specificity of Pra were 62% (95% CI 57-68%), 8.8% and 95.4% for hospitalization in 3 years; 59% (95% CI 53-64%), 8.3% and 94.8% for emergency room visits; 66% (95% CI 59-74%) and 68% (95% CI 63-73%), 15.0% and 96.0% for death. Survival curves showed that high-risk individuals were more likely to die compared with the low-risk individuals, adjusted to covariables (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Pra presented low accuracy, low sensitivity and high specificity for all outcomes observed, indicating a poor performance to screen vulnerable older adults in Brazil. Therefore, this tool should not be used alone, as a case-finding instrument. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 360-365.

摘要

目的

评估巴西里约热内卢市社区样本中预测医疗保健利用和死亡的再入院概率(Pra)量表的性能。

方法

这是一项前瞻性纵向研究。该样本由参与巴西老年人脆弱性研究网络研究的社区居住老年人组成,里约热内卢部分。它分析了基线和随访的数据。在基线时,764 名老年人根据 Pra 进行分层,3 年后收集了卫生服务利用和生存状况的数据。通过曲线下面积、敏感性和特异性来确定 Pra 在 3 年内预测住院、急诊就诊和死亡的准确性。Cox 回归估计了根据风险分层的生存曲线。

结果

Pra 的准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为 62%(95%CI 57-68%)、8.8%和 95.4%,预测 3 年内住院;59%(95%CI 53-64%)、8.3%和 94.8%,预测急诊就诊;66%(95%CI 59-74%)和 68%(95%CI 63-73%),预测死亡。生存曲线显示,与低危个体相比,高危个体更有可能死亡,调整了协变量(P<0.001)。

结论

Pra 对所有观察到的结果的准确性低、敏感性低和特异性高,表明该工具在筛查巴西脆弱老年人方面表现不佳。因此,该工具不应单独用作病例发现工具。老年医学与老年病学国际 2020;20:360-365.

相似文献

1
Screening for vulnerable older people: Is the Probability of Repeated Admission scale an accurate tool?筛查脆弱老年人:重复入院概率量表是否为准确工具?
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Apr;20(4):360-365. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13867. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
External validation of the Probability of repeated admission (Pra) risk prediction tool in older community-dwelling people attending general practice: a prospective cohort study.针对就诊于全科医疗的老年社区居民,重复入院概率(Pra)风险预测工具的外部验证:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012336. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012336.
3
A systematic review of the probability of repeated admission score in community-dwelling adults.社区居住成年人再次入院评分概率的系统评价。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Mar;61(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12150.
4
Frailty Could Predict Death in Older Adults after Admissionat Emergency Department? A 6-month Prospective Study from a Middle-Income Country.衰弱能否预测老年患者入住急诊科后的死亡风险?来自中等收入国家的 6 个月前瞻性研究。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23(7):641-647. doi: 10.1007/s12603-019-1207-9.
5
Screening elders for risk of hospital admission.筛查老年人的住院风险。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Aug;41(8):811-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06175.x.
6
Frailty in hemodialysis and prediction of poor short-term outcome: mortality, hospitalization and visits to hospital emergency services.血液透析患者衰弱与不良短期预后的预测:死亡率、住院率和急诊就诊率。
Ren Fail. 2019 Nov;41(1):567-575. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1628061.
7
[FIBRA-RJ Network: frailty and risk of hospitalization in the elderly in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil].[里约热内卢纤维网络:巴西里约热内卢老年人的衰弱与住院风险]
Cad Saude Publica. 2013 Jul;29(7):1381-91. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2013000700012.
8
Geriatric syndromes predict postdischarge outcomes among older emergency department patients: findings from the interRAI Multinational Emergency Department Study.老年综合征预测老年急诊科患者出院后的结局:来自国际复康资讯系统多国急诊科研究的结果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(4):422-33. doi: 10.1111/acem.12353.
9
Predictive validity of the Brazilian version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator for adverse health outcomes in older adults.巴西版蒂尔堡虚弱指标对老年人不良健康结局的预测效度。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 May-Jun;76:114-119. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
Predictive performance of four frailty screening tools in community-dwelling elderly.四种衰弱筛查工具在社区居住老年人中的预测性能。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 10;17(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0633-y.