Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Canada (L.F., D.d.V., T.C., J.R.-C.).
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain (E.M.-G., A.M.-G.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;13(2):e008620. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008620. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
Scarce data exist on coronary events following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and no study has determined the factors associated with poorer outcomes in this setting. This study sought to determine the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and prognostic factors of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events following TAVR.
Multicenter cohort study including a total of 270 patients presenting an ACS after a median time of 12 (interquartile range, 5-17) months post-TAVR. Post-ACS death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and overall major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events were recorded.
The ACS clinical presentation consisted of non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) type 2 (31.9%), non-STEMI type 1 (31.5%), unstable angina (28.5%), and STEMI (8.1%). An invasive strategy was used in 163 patients (60.4%), and a percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 97 patients (35.9%). Coronary access issues were observed in 2.5% and 2.1% of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention procedures, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 10.0%, and at a median follow-up of 17 (interquartile range, 5-32) months, the rates of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events were 43.0%, 4.1%, 15.2%, and 52.6%, respectively. By multivariable analysis, revascularization at ACS time was associated with a reduction of the risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36-0.81] =0.003), whereas STEMI increased the risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.05-4.03] =0.036) and major adverse cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.08-3.57] =0.026).
ACS events in TAVR recipients exhibited specific characteristics (ACS presentation, low use of invasive procedures, coronary access issues) and were associated with a poor prognosis, with a very high in-hospital and late death rate. STEMI and the lack of coronary revascularization determined an increased risk. These results should inform future studies to improve both the prevention and management of ACS post-TAVR.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后发生冠状动脉事件的数据很少,尚无研究确定该情况下与较差结局相关的因素。本研究旨在确定 TAVR 后发生急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)事件的临床特征、结局和预后因素。
这是一项多中心队列研究,共纳入 270 例 TAVR 后中位时间为 12 个月(四分位距 5-17)时发生 ACS 的患者。记录 ACS 后的死亡、心肌梗死、卒中和总体主要不良心血管或脑血管事件。
ACS 的临床表现为非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)2 型(31.9%)、NSTEMI 1 型(31.5%)、不稳定型心绞痛(28.5%)和 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)(8.1%)。163 例患者(60.4%)采用了有创策略,97 例患者(35.9%)进行了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中分别观察到 2.5%和 2.1%的冠状动脉入路问题。住院死亡率为 10.0%,中位随访 17 个月(四分位距 5-32)时,死亡、卒中和心肌梗死的发生率分别为 43.0%、4.1%和 15.2%,主要不良心血管或脑血管事件发生率为 52.6%。多变量分析显示,ACS 时血运重建与全因死亡风险降低相关(风险比,0.54 [95%CI,0.36-0.81] =0.003),而 STEMI 增加了全因死亡(风险比,2.06 [95%CI,1.05-4.03] =0.036)和主要不良心血管或脑血管事件(风险比,1.97 [95%CI,1.08-3.57] =0.026)的风险。
TAVR 受者的 ACS 事件具有特定特征(ACS 表现、有创治疗使用率低、冠状动脉入路问题),并与预后不良相关,住院期间和晚期死亡率非常高。STEMI 和缺乏冠状动脉血运重建决定了更高的风险。这些结果应该为未来的研究提供信息,以改善 TAVR 后 ACS 的预防和管理。