Suppr超能文献

流量控制通气(FCV)改善肥胖患者的区域性通气 - 一项随机对照交叉试验。

Flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) improves regional ventilation in obese patients - a randomized controlled crossover trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-0944-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In obese patients, high closing capacity and low functional residual capacity increase the risk for expiratory alveolar collapse. Constant expiratory flow, as provided by the new flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) mode, was shown to improve lung recruitment. We hypothesized that lung aeration and respiratory mechanics improve in obese patients during FCV.

METHODS

We compared FCV and volume-controlled (VCV) ventilation in 23 obese patients in a randomized crossover setting. Starting with baseline measurements, ventilation settings were kept identical except for the ventilation mode related differences (VCV: inspiration to expiration ratio 1:2 with passive expiration, FCV: inspiration to expiration ratio 1:1 with active, linearized expiration). Primary endpoint of the study was the change of end-expiratory lung volume compared to baseline ventilation. Secondary endpoints were the change of mean lung volume, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic variables.

RESULTS

The loss of end-expiratory lung volume and mean lung volume compared to baseline was lower during FCV compared to VCV (end-expiratory lung volume: FCV, - 126 ± 207 ml; VCV, - 316 ± 254 ml; p < 0.001, mean lung volume: FCV, - 108.2 ± 198.6 ml; VCV, - 315.8 ± 252.1 ml; p < 0.001) and at comparable plateau pressure (baseline, 19.6 ± 3.7; VCV, 20.2 ± 3.4; FCV, 20.2 ± 3.8 cmHO; p = 0.441), mean tracheal pressure was higher (baseline, 13.1 ± 1.1; VCV, 12.9 ± 1.2; FCV, 14.8 ± 2.2 cmHO; p < 0.001). All other respiratory and hemodynamic variables were comparable between the ventilation modes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that, compared to VCV, FCV improves regional ventilation distribution of the lung at comparable PEEP, tidal volume, P and ventilation frequency. The increase in end-expiratory lung volume during FCV was probably caused by the increased mean tracheal pressure which can be attributed to the linearized expiratory pressure decline.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00014925. Registered 12 July 2018.

摘要

背景

在肥胖患者中,高闭合容量和低功能残气量增加呼气肺泡塌陷的风险。新的流量控制通气(FCV)模式提供的恒流呼气,已被证明可改善肺复张。我们假设肥胖患者在 FCV 期间肺通气和呼吸力学得到改善。

方法

我们在一项随机交叉研究中比较了肥胖患者的 FCV 和容量控制通气(VCV)。从基线测量开始,除通气模式相关差异(VCV:吸气至呼气比 1:2,被动呼气,FCV:吸气至呼气比 1:1,主动,线性化呼气)外,保持通气设置相同。研究的主要终点是与基线通气相比,呼气末肺容量的变化。次要终点是平均肺容量、呼吸力学和血液动力学变量的变化。

结果

与 VCV 相比,FCV 时与基线相比,呼气末肺容量和平均肺容量的损失较低(呼气末肺容量:FCV,-126±207ml;VCV,-316±254ml;p<0.001,平均肺容量:FCV,-108.2±198.6ml;VCV,-315.8±252.1ml;p<0.001),且平台压相当(基线,19.6±3.7;VCV,20.2±3.4;FCV,20.2±3.8cmHO;p=0.441),气管平均压较高(基线,13.1±1.1;VCV,12.9±1.2;FCV,14.8±2.2cmHO;p<0.001)。两种通气模式之间的所有其他呼吸和血液动力学变量均无差异。

结论

与 VCV 相比,FCV 在相同的 PEEP、潮气量、P 和通气频率下,改善了肺的区域性通气分布。FCV 时呼气末肺容量的增加可能是由于气管平均压增加所致,这可能归因于呼气压力下降的线性化。

试验注册

德国临床试验注册处:DRKS00014925。注册于 2018 年 7 月 12 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fbf/6986135/b2b9d9b38a48/12871_2020_944_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验