Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jan 28;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-0944-y.
In obese patients, high closing capacity and low functional residual capacity increase the risk for expiratory alveolar collapse. Constant expiratory flow, as provided by the new flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) mode, was shown to improve lung recruitment. We hypothesized that lung aeration and respiratory mechanics improve in obese patients during FCV.
We compared FCV and volume-controlled (VCV) ventilation in 23 obese patients in a randomized crossover setting. Starting with baseline measurements, ventilation settings were kept identical except for the ventilation mode related differences (VCV: inspiration to expiration ratio 1:2 with passive expiration, FCV: inspiration to expiration ratio 1:1 with active, linearized expiration). Primary endpoint of the study was the change of end-expiratory lung volume compared to baseline ventilation. Secondary endpoints were the change of mean lung volume, respiratory mechanics and hemodynamic variables.
The loss of end-expiratory lung volume and mean lung volume compared to baseline was lower during FCV compared to VCV (end-expiratory lung volume: FCV, - 126 ± 207 ml; VCV, - 316 ± 254 ml; p < 0.001, mean lung volume: FCV, - 108.2 ± 198.6 ml; VCV, - 315.8 ± 252.1 ml; p < 0.001) and at comparable plateau pressure (baseline, 19.6 ± 3.7; VCV, 20.2 ± 3.4; FCV, 20.2 ± 3.8 cmHO; p = 0.441), mean tracheal pressure was higher (baseline, 13.1 ± 1.1; VCV, 12.9 ± 1.2; FCV, 14.8 ± 2.2 cmHO; p < 0.001). All other respiratory and hemodynamic variables were comparable between the ventilation modes.
This study demonstrates that, compared to VCV, FCV improves regional ventilation distribution of the lung at comparable PEEP, tidal volume, P and ventilation frequency. The increase in end-expiratory lung volume during FCV was probably caused by the increased mean tracheal pressure which can be attributed to the linearized expiratory pressure decline.
German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00014925. Registered 12 July 2018.
在肥胖患者中,高闭合容量和低功能残气量增加呼气肺泡塌陷的风险。新的流量控制通气(FCV)模式提供的恒流呼气,已被证明可改善肺复张。我们假设肥胖患者在 FCV 期间肺通气和呼吸力学得到改善。
我们在一项随机交叉研究中比较了肥胖患者的 FCV 和容量控制通气(VCV)。从基线测量开始,除通气模式相关差异(VCV:吸气至呼气比 1:2,被动呼气,FCV:吸气至呼气比 1:1,主动,线性化呼气)外,保持通气设置相同。研究的主要终点是与基线通气相比,呼气末肺容量的变化。次要终点是平均肺容量、呼吸力学和血液动力学变量的变化。
与 VCV 相比,FCV 时与基线相比,呼气末肺容量和平均肺容量的损失较低(呼气末肺容量:FCV,-126±207ml;VCV,-316±254ml;p<0.001,平均肺容量:FCV,-108.2±198.6ml;VCV,-315.8±252.1ml;p<0.001),且平台压相当(基线,19.6±3.7;VCV,20.2±3.4;FCV,20.2±3.8cmHO;p=0.441),气管平均压较高(基线,13.1±1.1;VCV,12.9±1.2;FCV,14.8±2.2cmHO;p<0.001)。两种通气模式之间的所有其他呼吸和血液动力学变量均无差异。
与 VCV 相比,FCV 在相同的 PEEP、潮气量、P 和通气频率下,改善了肺的区域性通气分布。FCV 时呼气末肺容量的增加可能是由于气管平均压增加所致,这可能归因于呼气压力下降的线性化。
德国临床试验注册处:DRKS00014925。注册于 2018 年 7 月 12 日。