• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在微创性修复治疗中,廉价玻璃离子水门汀与高粘度玻璃离子水门汀的存活率是否相同?一项 RCT 研究。

Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.

机构信息

Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Department of Pathology and Dental Clinics, Teresina, PI, Brazil.

Universidade Estadual de Maringá - UEM, Center for Biological Sciences, Department of Dentistry, Maringá, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Oral Res. 2020 Jan 24;33:e125. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0125. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0125
PMID:31994598
Abstract

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) is one of the strategies used to control dental caries; it involves hand instruments for removal of carious tissue, and restorations using high-viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC). The present controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate the performance of low-cost GIC indicated for ART in primary teeth, compared with high-viscosity GIC, after one year of follow-up. Two-to six-year-old children with dentin caries lesions on one or two surfaces of anterior and posterior teeth were selected. The children were randomly assigned to 2 groups according to the restorative material used: G1 (control) - Ketac Molar®; G2 (experimental) - Vitro Molar®. Treatments were performed in a school setting, following the guidelines of the ART. A total of 728 restorations were performed in 243 children. Descriptive analysis and Poisson regression were applied, with a significance level of p < 0.05. After 12 months, 559 (76.8%) restorations were re-evaluated. The success rate was evaluated by the prevalence ratio (PR), associated with restorations performed in primary second molars (PR = 1.21; 95%CI = 1.03-1.42), and with small (PR = 1.35; 95%CI = 1.14-1.60) or medium cavities (PR = 1.29; 95%CI = 1.08-1.55), using Ketac Molar® material (PR= 1.07; 95%CI = 1.01-1.15), considering p < 0.05. Small or medium restorations in primary second molars performed with high-viscosity GIC (Ketac Molar®) were more successful than restorations performed with low-cost GIC indicated for ART.

摘要

无痛性修复治疗(ART)是控制龋齿的策略之一;它涉及用于去除龋坏组织的手动器械,以及使用高粘度玻璃离聚物水泥(GIC)进行修复。本项对照临床试验旨在评估低成本 GIC 在原发性牙齿中的性能,该材料用于 ART,与高粘度 GIC 相比,在一年的随访后。选择有 1 或 2 个前牙和后牙的牙本质龋损的 2 至 6 岁儿童。根据使用的修复材料将儿童随机分为 2 组:G1(对照)- Ketac Molar®;G2(实验组)- Vitro Molar®。在学校环境中按照 ART 指南进行治疗。在 243 名儿童中进行了总共 728 次修复。应用描述性分析和泊松回归,显著性水平为 p < 0.05。12 个月后,559 次(76.8%)修复进行了重新评估。采用流行率比(PR)评估成功率,与原发性第二磨牙(PR = 1.21;95%CI = 1.03-1.42)和小(PR = 1.35;95%CI = 1.14-1.60)或中腔(PR = 1.29;95%CI = 1.08-1.55)进行的修复相关,使用 Ketac Molar®材料(PR = 1.07;95%CI = 1.01-1.15),p < 0.05。用高粘度 GIC(Ketac Molar®)进行的原发性第二磨牙的小或中腔修复比低成本 GIC 指示的 ART 修复更成功。

相似文献

1
Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.在微创性修复治疗中,廉价玻璃离子水门汀与高粘度玻璃离子水门汀的存活率是否相同?一项 RCT 研究。
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Jan 24;33:e125. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0125. eCollection 2020.
2
Low-cost GICs reduce survival rate in occlusal ART restorations in primary molars after one year: A RCT.低成本玻璃离子水门汀降低了乳磨牙咬合面非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复体一年后的生存率:一项随机对照试验。
J Dent. 2017 Feb;57:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
3
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.非创伤性修复治疗与传统修复治疗在龋病管理中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):CD008072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008072.pub2.
4
Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial.玻璃碳基聚合物和复合体用于 ART 修复:一项随机临床试验的 3 年结果。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1761-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2593-9. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
5
2-year survival and cost analysis of occlusoproximal ART restorations using encapsulated glass ionomer cement in primary molars: a randomized controlled trial.使用玻璃离子水门汀对乳磨牙行邻面-𬌗面洞型嵌体修复的 2 年存活率和成本分析:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 1;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04357-9.
6
Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT.手混或胶囊型玻璃离子水门汀对乳磨牙修复体存活率的影响:24 个月 RCT。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0.
7
The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.GIC 品牌对近中 -ART 修复体存活率的影响。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jul;23(4):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01259.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
8
Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement.使用非创伤性修复治疗(ART)技术和富士II玻璃离子水门汀修复柬埔寨农村儿童的恒牙。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 1998 Mar;8(1):35-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.1998.00058.x.
9
Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial.使用大块充填复合树脂的传统治疗与非创伤性修复治疗在乳牙和恒牙列中的有效性:一项实用随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2016 Aug 2;17(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0260-6.
10
One year Survival Rate of Ketac Molar versus Vitro Molar for Occlusoproximal ART Restorations: a RCT.用于咬合面-邻面非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复的Ketac Molar与Vitro Molar的一年生存率:一项随机对照试验。
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Nov 6;31:e88. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0088.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Dental Restorative Materials in the Atraumatic Treatment of Carious Primary Teeth in Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review.牙科修复材料在儿童牙科无创伤治疗龋病乳牙中的有效性:一项系统评价。
Children (Basel). 2025 Apr 16;12(4):511. doi: 10.3390/children12040511.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Decisions for Early Childhood Caries in Infants and Toddlers: A Systematic Review.婴幼儿早期龋治疗决策的成本效益:系统评价。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Oct 20;59(10):1865. doi: 10.3390/medicina59101865.
3
Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious primary teeth without pulp therapy: a systematic review.
修复材料在未进行牙髓治疗的龋损乳恒牙修复中的临床效果:系统评价。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2022 Oct;23(5):727-759. doi: 10.1007/s40368-022-00725-7. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
4
Twelve-month evaluation of the atraumatic restorative treatment approach for class III restorations: An interventional study.III类修复体非创伤性修复治疗方法的12个月评估:一项干预性研究。
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Sep 26;8(18):3999-4009. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i18.3999.