Suppr超能文献

糖尿病与冠状动脉血运重建后心力衰竭的长期风险。

Diabetes Mellitus and Long-Term Risk for Heart Failure After Coronary Revascularization.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Hyogo College of Medicine.

出版信息

Circ J. 2020 Feb 25;84(3):471-478. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0980. Epub 2020 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) status on the long-term risk for heart failure (HF) in patients undergoing coronary revascularization has not been adequately evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, 15,231 patients who underwent coronary revascularization in the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2 were divided into 2 groups according to DM status (DM group: n=5,999; Non-DM group: n=9,232). The DM group was further divided into 2 groups according to insulin treatment (insulin-treated DM [ITDM]: n=1,353; non-insulin-treated DM [NITDM]: n=4,646). The primary outcome measure was HF hospitalization. The cumulative 5-year incidence of HF hospitalization was significantly higher in the DM than non-DM group (11.0% vs. 6.6%, respectively; log-rank P<0.0001), and in the ITDM than NITDM group (14.6% vs. 10.0%, respectively; log-rank P<0.0001). After adjusting for confounders, the increased risk of HF hospitalization with DM relative to non-DM remained significant (hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.67, P<0.0001), whereas the risk associated with ITDM relative to NITDM was not significant (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96-1.43, P=0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The adjusted long-term risk for HF hospitalization after coronary revascularization was significantly higher in DM than non-DM patients, regardless of revascularization strategy, but did not differ between ITDM and NITDM patients.

摘要

背景

糖尿病(DM)状态对接受冠状动脉血运重建的患者心力衰竭(HF)的长期风险的影响尚未得到充分评估。

方法和结果

在这项研究中,根据 DM 状态(DM 组:n=5999;非 DM 组:n=9232)将在 CREDO-Kyoto 注册队列-2 中接受冠状动脉血运重建的 15231 名患者分为 2 组。DM 组进一步根据胰岛素治疗情况分为 2 组(胰岛素治疗 DM [ITDM]:n=1353;非胰岛素治疗 DM [NITDM]:n=4646)。主要观察终点为 HF 住院。DM 组的 5 年累积 HF 住院发生率明显高于非 DM 组(分别为 11.0%和 6.6%;log-rank P<0.0001),ITDM 组明显高于 NITDM 组(分别为 14.6%和 10.0%;log-rank P<0.0001)。调整混杂因素后,DM 组 HF 住院风险较非 DM 组仍显著增加(HR 1.47,95%CI 1.30-1.67,P<0.0001),而 ITDM 组与 NITDM 组的风险差异无统计学意义(HR 1.17,95%CI 0.96-1.43,P=0.12)。

结论

无论血运重建策略如何,与非 DM 患者相比,DM 患者冠状动脉血运重建后 HF 住院的调整后长期风险明显更高,但 ITDM 患者与 NITDM 患者之间的风险无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验