Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2020 Feb/Mar;41 Suppl 2S:S105-S110. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000773.
Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) rely on a robust assessment of the quality of evidence supporting guideline recommendations. For the Society for Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (SDBP) CPG for the Assessment and Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Complex Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), the nature of the evidence and resource constraints led the guideline panel to develop an innovative, yet rigorous, approach to evidence grading. This study will (1) describe the challenges of evidence grading for the SDBP Complex ADHD Guideline; (2) discuss the rationale, process, and tools developed to conduct evidence grading; and (3) report on the experiences and readiness of the volunteer reviewers with diverse background in research methodology to conduct evidence grading. This evidence review process may serve as an example of approaches that can be used by other groups tasked with evaluating the evidence in support of new CPGs.
临床实践指南(CPGs)依赖于对支持指南建议的证据质量进行稳健评估。对于发育和行为儿科学会(SDBP)针对复杂注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童和青少年的评估和治疗的 CPG,证据的性质和资源限制促使指南小组开发了一种创新但严格的证据分级方法。本研究将:(1)描述 SDBP 复杂 ADHD 指南证据分级的挑战;(2)讨论为进行证据分级而开发的原理、过程和工具;(3)报告具有不同研究方法背景的志愿者审查员进行证据分级的经验和准备情况。这个证据审查过程可以作为其他负责评估新 CPG 证据的小组使用的方法示例。