Suppr超能文献

经颅多普勒超声在儿童重型颅脑损伤患者中脑灌注压的无创评估。

Non-invasive estimation of cerebral perfusion pressure using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography in children with severe traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.

Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.

出版信息

Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Sep;36(9):2063-2071. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04524-7. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify if cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) can be non-invasively estimated by either of two methods calculated using transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) parameters.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of previously prospectively gathered data.

SETTING

Pediatric intensive care unit in a tertiary care referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three children with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in place.

INTERVENTIONS

TCD evaluation of the middle cerebral arteries was performed daily. CPP at the time of the TCD examination was recorded. For method 1, estimated cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPe) was calculated as: CPPe = MAP × (diastolic flow (Vd)/mean flow (Vm)) + 14. For method 2, critical closing pressure (CrCP) was identified as the intercept point on the x-axis of the linear regression line of blood pressure and flow velocity parameters. CrCP/CPPe was then calculated as MAP-CrCP.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One hundred eight paired measurements were available. Using patient averaged data, correlation between CPP and CPPe was significant (r = 0.78, p = < 0.001). However, on Bland-Altman plots, bias was 3.7 mmHg with 95% limits of agreement of - 17 to + 25 for CPPe. Using patient averaged data, correlation between CPP and CrCP/CPPe was significant (r = 0.59, p = < 0.001), but again bias was high at 11 mmHg with wide 95% limits of agreement of - 15 to + 38 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

CPPe and CrCP/CPPe do not have clinical value to estimate the absolute CPP in pediatric patients with TBI.

摘要

目的

确定通过经颅多普勒超声(TCD)参数计算的两种方法中的任意一种是否可以无创估计脑灌注压(CPP)。

设计

回顾性分析先前前瞻性收集的数据。

设置

三级转诊医院的儿科重症监护病房。

患者

23 例严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患儿,有颅内压(ICP)监测。

干预措施

每天对大脑中动脉进行 TCD 评估。记录 TCD 检查时的 CPP。对于方法 1,估算的脑灌注压(CPPe)计算为:CPPe=MAP×(舒张期流量(Vd)/平均流量(Vm))+14。对于方法 2,将临界关闭压力(CrCP)确定为血压和血流速度参数线性回归线的 x 轴截距。然后计算 CrCP/CPPe 为 MAP-CrCP。

测量和主要结果

共有 108 对测量值。使用患者平均数据,CPP 与 CPPe 之间存在显著相关性(r=0.78,p<0.001)。然而,在 Bland-Altman 图上,CPPe 的偏差为 3.7mmHg,95%一致性界限为-17 至+25mmHg。使用患者平均数据,CPP 与 CrCP/CPPe 之间存在显著相关性(r=0.59,p<0.001),但偏差仍很高,为 11mmHg,95%一致性界限为-15 至+38mmHg。

结论

CPPe 和 CrCP/CPPe 没有临床价值来估计 TBI 儿科患者的绝对 CPP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验