Kumar Ramesh, Singhi Sunit, Singhi Pratibha, Jayashree Muralidharan, Bansal Arun, Bhatti Anuj
Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1775-87. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000298.
In children with acute CNS infection, management of raised intracranial pressure improves mortality and neuromorbidity. We compared cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted approach with the conventional intracranial pressure-targeted approach to treat raised intracranial pressure in these children.
Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial.
PICU in a tertiary care academic institute.
Hundred ten children (1-12 yr) with acute CNS infections having raised intracranial pressure and a modified Glasgow Coma Scale score less than or equal to 8 were enrolled.
Patients were randomized to receive either cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy (n = 55) (maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure ≥ 60 mm Hg, using normal saline bolus and vasoactive therapy-dopamine, and if needed noradrenaline) or intracranial pressure-targeted therapy (n = 55) (maintaining intracranial pressure < 20 mm Hg using osmotherapy while ensuring normal blood pressure). The primary outcome was mortality up to 90 days after discharge from PICU. Secondary outcome was modified Glasgow Coma Scale score at 72 hours after enrollment, length of PICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and hearing deficit and functional neurodisability at discharge and 90-day follow-up.
A 90-day mortality in intracranial pressure group (38.2%) was significantly higher than cerebral perfusion pressure group (18.2%; relative risk = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.09-4.04; p = 0.020). The cerebral perfusion pressure group in comparison with intracranial pressure group had significantly higher median (interquartile range) modified Glasgow Coma Scale score at 72 hours (10 [8-11] vs 7 [4-9], p < 0.001), shorter length of PICU stay (13 d [10.8-15.2 d] vs. 18 d [14.5-21.5 d], p = 0.002) and mechanical ventilation (7.5 d [5.4-9.6 d] vs. 11.5 d [9.5-13.5 d], p = 0.003), lower prevalence of hearing deficit (8.9% vs 37.1%; relative risk = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.90; p = 0.005), and neurodisability at discharge from PICU (53.3% vs. 82.9%; relative risk = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.81; p = 0.005) and 90 days after discharge (37.8% vs. 70.6%; relative risk = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.83; p = 0.004).
Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy, which relied on more frequent use of vasopressors and lesser use of hyperventilation and osmotherapy, was superior to intracranial pressure-targeted therapy for management of raised intracranial pressure in children with acute CNS infection in reducing mortality and morbidity.
在患有急性中枢神经系统感染的儿童中,控制颅内压升高可改善死亡率和神经疾病发病率。我们比较了以脑灌注压为目标的治疗方法与传统的以颅内压为目标的治疗方法,以治疗这些儿童的颅内压升高。
前瞻性开放标签随机对照试验。
一家三级医疗学术机构的儿科重症监护病房。
纳入110名年龄在1至12岁之间、患有急性中枢神经系统感染且颅内压升高、改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分小于或等于8分的儿童。
患者被随机分为接受以脑灌注压为目标的治疗组(n = 55)(维持脑灌注压≥60 mmHg,使用生理盐水推注和血管活性药物——多巴胺,必要时使用去甲肾上腺素)或以颅内压为目标的治疗组(n = 55)(使用渗透性疗法维持颅内压<20 mmHg,同时确保血压正常)。主要结局是从儿科重症监护病房出院后90天内的死亡率。次要结局是入组后72小时的改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、儿科重症监护病房住院时间、机械通气时间、出院时及90天随访时的听力障碍和功能性神经残疾情况。
颅内压组90天死亡率(38.2%)显著高于脑灌注压组(18.2%;相对风险 = 2.1;95%置信区间,1.09 - 4.04;p = 0.020)。与颅内压组相比,脑灌注压组在72小时时改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分中位数(四分位间距)显著更高(10 [8 - 11] 对7 [4 - 9],p < 0.001),儿科重症监护病房住院时间更短(13天 [10.8 - 15.2天] 对18天 [14.5 - 21.5天],p = 0.002),机械通气时间更短(7.5天 [5.4 - 9.6天] 对11.5天 [9.5 - 13.5天],p = 0.003),听力障碍患病率更低(8.9%对37.1%;相对风险 = 0.69;95%置信区间,0.53 - 0.90;p = 0.005),儿科重症监护病房出院时(53.3%对82.9%;相对风险 = 0.37;95%置信区间,0.17 - 0.81;p = 0.005)及出院后90天(37.8%对70.6%;相对风险 = 0.47;95%置信区间,0.27 - 0.83;p = 0.004)的神经残疾发生率更低。
以脑灌注压为目标的治疗方法更多地依赖血管升压药的频繁使用,较少使用过度通气和渗透性疗法,在降低死亡率和发病率方面,对于治疗急性中枢神经系统感染儿童的颅内压升高优于以颅内压为目标的治疗方法。