Suppr超能文献

比较脑灌注压靶向治疗与颅内压靶向治疗对儿童急性中枢神经系统感染所致颅内压升高疗效的随机对照试验。

Randomized controlled trial comparing cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy versus intracranial pressure-targeted therapy for raised intracranial pressure due to acute CNS infections in children.

作者信息

Kumar Ramesh, Singhi Sunit, Singhi Pratibha, Jayashree Muralidharan, Bansal Arun, Bhatti Anuj

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1775-87. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000298.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In children with acute CNS infection, management of raised intracranial pressure improves mortality and neuromorbidity. We compared cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted approach with the conventional intracranial pressure-targeted approach to treat raised intracranial pressure in these children.

DESIGN

Prospective open-label randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

PICU in a tertiary care academic institute.

PATIENTS

Hundred ten children (1-12 yr) with acute CNS infections having raised intracranial pressure and a modified Glasgow Coma Scale score less than or equal to 8 were enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive either cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy (n = 55) (maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure ≥ 60 mm Hg, using normal saline bolus and vasoactive therapy-dopamine, and if needed noradrenaline) or intracranial pressure-targeted therapy (n = 55) (maintaining intracranial pressure < 20 mm Hg using osmotherapy while ensuring normal blood pressure). The primary outcome was mortality up to 90 days after discharge from PICU. Secondary outcome was modified Glasgow Coma Scale score at 72 hours after enrollment, length of PICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and hearing deficit and functional neurodisability at discharge and 90-day follow-up.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A 90-day mortality in intracranial pressure group (38.2%) was significantly higher than cerebral perfusion pressure group (18.2%; relative risk = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.09-4.04; p = 0.020). The cerebral perfusion pressure group in comparison with intracranial pressure group had significantly higher median (interquartile range) modified Glasgow Coma Scale score at 72 hours (10 [8-11] vs 7 [4-9], p < 0.001), shorter length of PICU stay (13 d [10.8-15.2 d] vs. 18 d [14.5-21.5 d], p = 0.002) and mechanical ventilation (7.5 d [5.4-9.6 d] vs. 11.5 d [9.5-13.5 d], p = 0.003), lower prevalence of hearing deficit (8.9% vs 37.1%; relative risk = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.90; p = 0.005), and neurodisability at discharge from PICU (53.3% vs. 82.9%; relative risk = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.17-0.81; p = 0.005) and 90 days after discharge (37.8% vs. 70.6%; relative risk = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27-0.83; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy, which relied on more frequent use of vasopressors and lesser use of hyperventilation and osmotherapy, was superior to intracranial pressure-targeted therapy for management of raised intracranial pressure in children with acute CNS infection in reducing mortality and morbidity.

摘要

目的

在患有急性中枢神经系统感染的儿童中,控制颅内压升高可改善死亡率和神经疾病发病率。我们比较了以脑灌注压为目标的治疗方法与传统的以颅内压为目标的治疗方法,以治疗这些儿童的颅内压升高。

设计

前瞻性开放标签随机对照试验。

地点

一家三级医疗学术机构的儿科重症监护病房。

患者

纳入110名年龄在1至12岁之间、患有急性中枢神经系统感染且颅内压升高、改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分小于或等于8分的儿童。

干预措施

患者被随机分为接受以脑灌注压为目标的治疗组(n = 55)(维持脑灌注压≥60 mmHg,使用生理盐水推注和血管活性药物——多巴胺,必要时使用去甲肾上腺素)或以颅内压为目标的治疗组(n = 55)(使用渗透性疗法维持颅内压<20 mmHg,同时确保血压正常)。主要结局是从儿科重症监护病房出院后90天内的死亡率。次要结局是入组后72小时的改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、儿科重症监护病房住院时间、机械通气时间、出院时及90天随访时的听力障碍和功能性神经残疾情况。

测量指标及主要结果

颅内压组90天死亡率(38.2%)显著高于脑灌注压组(18.2%;相对风险 = 2.1;95%置信区间,1.09 - 4.04;p = 0.020)。与颅内压组相比,脑灌注压组在72小时时改良格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分中位数(四分位间距)显著更高(10 [8 - 11] 对7 [4 - 9],p < 0.001),儿科重症监护病房住院时间更短(13天 [10.8 - 15.2天] 对18天 [14.5 - 21.5天],p = 0.002),机械通气时间更短(7.5天 [5.4 - 9.6天] 对11.5天 [9.5 - 13.5天],p = 0.003),听力障碍患病率更低(8.9%对37.1%;相对风险 = 0.69;95%置信区间,0.53 - 0.90;p = 0.005),儿科重症监护病房出院时(53.3%对82.9%;相对风险 = 0.37;95%置信区间,0.17 - 0.81;p = 0.005)及出院后90天(37.8%对70.6%;相对风险 = 0.47;95%置信区间,0.27 - 0.83;p = 0.004)的神经残疾发生率更低。

结论

以脑灌注压为目标的治疗方法更多地依赖血管升压药的频繁使用,较少使用过度通气和渗透性疗法,在降低死亡率和发病率方面,对于治疗急性中枢神经系统感染儿童的颅内压升高优于以颅内压为目标的治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验