Suppr超能文献

多感官反应能力和人格特质可预测每日疼痛敏感性。

Multi-sensory Responsiveness and Personality Traits Predict Daily Pain Sensitivity.

作者信息

Bar-Shalita Tami, Cermak Sharon A

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy at the Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Integr Neurosci. 2020 Jan 10;13:77. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00077. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

: A continuous effort has been devoted to identifying factors that contribute to individual differences in pain perception. Amongst the personality traits, Neuroticism is assumed to be the most significant moderator of experimental and clinical pain. Multi-sensory responsiveness to daily sensations has been shown to be associated with pain perception. Yet, neither the relationship between personality traits and multi-sensory responsiveness nor the impact of both these factors to pain perception have been examined. Thus, this study aims to explore the contribution of both multi-sensory responsiveness and personality traits to pain perception in a daily context. : A community-based sample of 204 adults completed the Sensory Responsiveness Questionnaire-Intensity Scale (SRQ-IS); the Big Five Inventory (BFI); and the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ). : The partial eta-square demonstrated that the sub-scale score had the strongest relationship with the PSQ-Total score, accounting for 9% of the variation. The regression coefficient relating PSQ-Total score with , and BFI sub-scales of scores was found to be = 0.39 ( < 0.0001), accounting for 16% of the variance, and yielding a large effect size. : To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to report on the interplay between aversive responsiveness to daily sensations and personality traits of as contributing factors to daily pain sensitivity, amongst which aversive responsiveness was found as the major contributing factor. This study may broaden the understanding of the pain experience variability, both in practice and in experimental research.

摘要

人们一直在持续努力确定导致疼痛感知个体差异的因素。在人格特质中,神经质被认为是实验性疼痛和临床疼痛最显著的调节因素。对日常感觉的多感官反应已被证明与疼痛感知有关。然而,人格特质与多感官反应之间的关系以及这两个因素对疼痛感知的影响都尚未得到研究。因此,本研究旨在探讨多感官反应和人格特质在日常情境中对疼痛感知的作用。:一个由204名成年人组成的社区样本完成了感官反应问卷强度量表(SRQ-IS)、大五人格量表(BFI)和疼痛敏感性问卷(PSQ)。:偏 eta 平方表明,该子量表得分与PSQ总分的关系最为密切,占变异的9%。PSQ总分与 以及得分的BFI子量表的回归系数为 = 0.39(< 0.0001),占方差的16%,且效应量较大。:据我们所知,这是第一项报告日常感觉厌恶反应与 人格特质之间相互作用作为日常疼痛敏感性影响因素的研究,其中厌恶反应被发现是主要影响因素。本研究可能会拓宽在实践和实验研究中对疼痛体验变异性的理解。

相似文献

1
Multi-sensory Responsiveness and Personality Traits Predict Daily Pain Sensitivity.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2020 Jan 10;13:77. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00077. eCollection 2019.
2
Ecological aspects of pain in sensory modulation disorder.
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Oct-Nov;45-46:157-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.028. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
3
The study of predicting role of personality traits in the perception of labor pain.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014 Feb;19(7 Suppl 1):S97-S102.
5
More Insight on the Role of Personality Traits and Sensitivity to Experimental Pain.
J Pain Res. 2021 Jun 17;14:1837-1844. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S309729. eCollection 2021.
7
An Examination of Personality Traits Associated with Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR).
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 23;8:247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00247. eCollection 2017.
8
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
9
[A study of temperament and personality in children diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)].
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.01.004. Epub 2012 May 26.
10
Opening a window into the riddle of misophonia, sensory over-responsiveness, and pain.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Aug 3;16:907585. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.907585. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Thalamic CGRP neurons define a spinothalamic pathway for affective pain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 15;122(28):e2505889122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2505889122. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
3
Personality and Pain Outcomes in Rheumatic Disease: The Mediating Role of Psychological Flexibility.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 25;12(11):1087. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12111087.
5
Fibromyalgia is linked to increased subjective sensory sensitivity across multiple senses.
Perception. 2024 Apr;53(4):276-286. doi: 10.1177/03010066241234037. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
6
Sensory modulation and trauma-related symptoms during rocket attacks.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(2):2213110. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2213110.
7
Exploring pain catastrophizing and its associations with low disease activity in rheumatic inflammatory disorders.
Rheumatol Int. 2023 Apr;43(4):687-694. doi: 10.1007/s00296-023-05271-z. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
8
Opening a window into the riddle of misophonia, sensory over-responsiveness, and pain.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Aug 3;16:907585. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.907585. eCollection 2022.
9
Association between self-reported drug hypersensitivity reactions and psychological disorders.
Asia Pac Allergy. 2022 Apr 21;12(2):e15. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e15. eCollection 2022 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensory Modulation Disorder (SMD) and Pain: A New Perspective.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2019 Jul 18;13:27. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2019.00027. eCollection 2019.
2
Sensory Over-Responsiveness among Healthy Subjects is Associated with a Pronociceptive State.
Pain Pract. 2018 Apr;18(4):473-486. doi: 10.1111/papr.12619. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
3
Atypical Sensory Modulation and Psychological Distress in the General Population.
Am J Occup Ther. 2016 Jul-Aug;70(4):7004250010. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2016.018648.
4
The Quality of Pain Centers, How should it be Assessed?
Pain Pract. 2016 Jan;16(1):7-11. doi: 10.1111/papr.12332.
5
Sensory Processing and Its Relationship with Children's Daily Life Participation.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016;36(1):73-87. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2015.1040573. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
6
Ecological aspects of pain in sensory modulation disorder.
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Oct-Nov;45-46:157-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.07.028. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
7
Relationship between Personality Traits and Endogenous Analgesia: The Role of Harm Avoidance.
Pain Pract. 2016 Jan;16(1):38-45. doi: 10.1111/papr.12256. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
8
Atypical central pain processing in sensory modulation disorder: absence of temporal summation and higher after-sensation.
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Feb;232(2):587-95. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3767-y. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
9
Five-factor personality traits and pain sensitivity: a twin study.
Pain. 2013 May;154(5):722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.01.010. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
10
Theories of pain: from specificity to gate control.
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jan;109(1):5-12. doi: 10.1152/jn.00457.2012. Epub 2012 Oct 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验