Delwel R, van Gurp R, Bot F, Touw I, Löwenberg B
Dr. Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Leukemia. 1988 Dec;2(12):814-9.
Previous studies have shown that the phenotypes of progenitors of human AML (AML-CFU) are variable, reflecting arrests at different stages of maturation. We were interested to seek discrepancies between the surface properties of AML precursors and normal bone marrow colony formers in order to detect minimal numbers of AML cells among normal bone marrow cells in remission bone marrow. Therefore, we selected two surface markers, the MoAb CD34, reactive with blast cells, and Vim-2, a surface marker reactive with mature myeloid cells, and determined the antigen density of these markers (relative fluorescence intensity using fluorescence-activated cell sorting) for normal marrow and AML progenitors. While these markers defined an identical phenotype (CD34++/Vim-2-/+) for a broad spectrum of normal progenitors, i.e., CFU-GEMM, BFU-e, day 15 CFU-GM, and day 7 CFU-GM, referred to as the "normal" progenitor phenotype, AML progenitors frequently exhibited different phenotypes. In 12 of 20 cases the phenotypes of the majority of AML progenitors were discrepant from the normal surface profile, i.e., according to one marker in 8 cases (CD34-/+/Vim-2-/+ or CD34++/Vim-2++) and two markers in 4 cases (CD34-/+/Vim-2++). Since these data indicate that AML and normal progenitors were frequently distinguishable, we then determined the potential utility of these phenotypic dissimilarities for detection of minimal disease. Artificial mixtures of normal bone marrow and minimal numbers (0.1-1%) of AML cells were prepared. Based upon the phenotypic discrepancies, AML metaphases were successfully demonstrated in these mixtures following cell sorting and culture. Thus, it appears that minimal numbers of AML mitoses can be identified with an approximate 10(-2) to 10(-3) sensitivity by taking advantage of differential coexpression of surface antigens.
先前的研究表明,人类急性髓系白血病祖细胞(AML-CFU)的表型是可变的,反映了在不同成熟阶段的停滞。我们感兴趣的是寻找AML前体细胞与正常骨髓集落形成细胞表面特性之间的差异,以便在缓解期骨髓的正常骨髓细胞中检测出最少数量的AML细胞。因此,我们选择了两种表面标志物,一种是与原始细胞反应的单克隆抗体CD34,另一种是与成熟髓系细胞反应的表面标志物Vim-2,并确定了这些标志物在正常骨髓和AML祖细胞中的抗原密度(使用荧光激活细胞分选法测定相对荧光强度)。虽然这些标志物为广泛的正常祖细胞,即粒-红-巨核-巨噬系集落形成单位(CFU-GEMM)、嗜碱性粒细胞集落形成单位(BFU-e)、第15天粒-巨噬系集落形成单位(CFU-GM)和第7天CFU-GM,定义了相同的表型(CD34++/Vim-2-/+),即所谓的“正常”祖细胞表型,但AML祖细胞经常表现出不同的表型。在20例病例中的12例中,大多数AML祖细胞的表型与正常表面特征不同,即8例根据一种标志物(CD34-/+/Vim-2-/+或CD34++/Vim-2++),4例根据两种标志物(CD34-/+/Vim-2++)。由于这些数据表明AML和正常祖细胞经常是可区分的,我们随后确定了这些表型差异在检测微小疾病方面的潜在效用。制备了正常骨髓与最少数量(0.1%-1%)AML细胞的人工混合物。基于表型差异,在细胞分选和培养后,成功地在这些混合物中证明了AML中期细胞。因此,利用表面抗原的差异共表达,似乎可以以大约10^(-2)到10^(-3)的灵敏度识别出最少数量 的AML有丝分裂细胞。