Suppr超能文献

采用结构方程模型研究生长猪积极情绪状态对行为和生理参数的影响。

Investigation of influence of growing pigs' positive affective state on behavioral and physiological parameters using structural equation modeling.

机构信息

Institute of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2020 Feb 1;98(2). doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa028.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the primarily positive affective state of fattening pigs influences various behavioral and physiological parameters such as the pigs' playing behavior, way of behaving in behavioral tests, body language signals, or diameter, and astroglia cell numbers of hippocampi, salivary immunoglobulin A (IgA) content, or salivary protein composition. Additionally, the suitability of the variables mentioned was examined to assess the pigs' positive affective state in practice, which still constitutes a latent variable not itself measurable. For this, a dataset including behavioral and physiological data of 60 fattening pigs from 3 different farms with different housing systems was analyzed by the partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) method. A hierarchical component model (HCM) was used including the pigs' positive affective state as a higher-order component (HOC) and the behavioral and physiological parameters as lower-order components (LOC). Playing behavior, body language signals, and behavioral tests were revealed, in this order, to be most influenced by the pigs' positive affective state since these resulted in the corresponding path coefficients (PC) of PC = 0.83, PC = 0.79, and PC = 0.62, respectively. Additionally moderate and weak R2-values occurred for the endogenous latent variables playing behavior (R2 = 69.8%), body language signals (R2 = 62.7%), and behavioral tests (R2 = 39.5%). Furthermore, the indicator of the "locomotor play" showed the highest indicator reliability (IR) (IR = 0.85) to estimate the latent variable of pigs' positive affective state. The results of the present study supplement the comprehension and assessment of the pigs' positive affective state in general.

摘要

本研究旨在探究育肥猪最初的积极情绪状态是否会影响各种行为和生理参数,如猪的玩耍行为、行为测试中的行为方式、身体语言信号、海马体的直径和星形胶质细胞数量、唾液免疫球蛋白 A(IgA)含量或唾液蛋白组成。此外,还检验了上述变量的适用性,以评估猪在实践中的积极情绪状态,因为这仍然是一个不可测量的潜在变量。为此,使用偏最小二乘结构方程建模(PLS-SEM)方法分析了来自 3 个不同饲养系统农场的 60 头育肥猪的行为和生理数据。使用分层组件模型(HCM),包括猪的积极情绪状态作为高阶组件(HOC)和行为及生理参数作为低阶组件(LOC)。按照玩耍行为、身体语言信号和行为测试的顺序,这些参数受猪的积极情绪状态的影响最大,因为它们对应的路径系数(PC)分别为 PC = 0.83、PC = 0.79 和 PC = 0.62。此外,内隐潜在变量的中等和较弱 R2 值也相继出现,玩耍行为的 R2 值为 69.8%,身体语言信号的 R2 值为 62.7%,行为测试的 R2 值为 39.5%。此外,“运动性玩耍”指标显示出最高的内隐性变量可靠性(IR)(IR = 0.85),可以用来估计猪的积极情绪状态的潜在变量。本研究的结果补充了对猪的积极情绪状态的理解和评估。

相似文献

2
Are Behavioral Tests Capable of Measuring Positive Affective States in Growing Pigs?
Animals (Basel). 2019 May 24;9(5):274. doi: 10.3390/ani9050274.
5
Stress-induced hypoalgesia and opioid inhibition of pigs' responses to restraint.
Physiol Behav. 1991 Dec;50(6):1093-6. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90566-7.
6
Preweaning housing effects on behavior and physiological measures in pigs during the suckling and fattening periods.
J Anim Sci. 2007 Jul;85(7):1741-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-504. Epub 2007 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotional "Contagion" in Piglets after Sensory Avoidance of Rewarding and Punishing Treatment.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Apr 4;14(7):1110. doi: 10.3390/ani14071110.
3
Feeding behavior in pigs.
J Anim Sci. 2021 May 1;99(5). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab115.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Behavioral Tests Capable of Measuring Positive Affective States in Growing Pigs?
Animals (Basel). 2019 May 24;9(5):274. doi: 10.3390/ani9050274.
2
Behavioural lateralization in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa)-variations between motor functions and individuals.
Laterality. 2018 Sep;23(5):576-598. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2017.1410555. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
3
Can the way pigs are handled alter behavioural and physiological measures of affective state?
Behav Processes. 2017 Sep;142:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
4
Assessment of the multi-criteria evaluation system of the Welfare Quality® protocol for growing pigs.
Animal. 2017 Sep;11(9):1573-1580. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117000210. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
6
The Way Humans Behave Modulates the Emotional State of Piglets.
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0133408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133408. eCollection 2015.
7
The pig as an animal model for human pathologies: A proteomics perspective.
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014 Oct;8(9-10):715-31. doi: 10.1002/prca.201300099. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
8
Is structural equation modeling advantageous for the genetic improvement of multiple traits?
Genetics. 2013 Jul;194(3):561-72. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.151209. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
9
Indicators of positive and negative emotions and emotional contagion in pigs.
Physiol Behav. 2013 Jan 17;109:42-50. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
10
On the significance of adult play: what does social play tell us about adult horse welfare?
Naturwissenschaften. 2012 Apr;99(4):291-302. doi: 10.1007/s00114-012-0902-8. Epub 2012 Mar 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验