• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用社交媒体调查发现监测单绒毛膜-双羊膜性双胎的管理中的区域性差异的新方法。

Novel Use of a Social-Media-Based Survey to Detect Regional Differences in Management of Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twins.

机构信息

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, California.

Eastside Maternal Fetal Medicine, Evergreen Health Hospital Fetal Therapy Program, Kirkland, Washington.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jul;37(9):890-897. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1701027. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1701027
PMID:32000293
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to evaluate the utility of social media to distribute a patient survey on differences in management and outcomes of monochorionic-diamniotic (MCDA) pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey was posted to an English-language MCDA twins patient-centered support group within the social media site, Facebook from April 2, 2018 to June 26, 2018. Subjects were recruited through a technique called "snowballing," whereby individuals shared the survey to assist with recruiting. Patient reported data were analyzed using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis's tests to explore characteristics associated with surveillance and outcomes as related to region and provider type.

RESULTS

Over 3 months, the post "reached" 14,288 Facebook users, among which 5,653 (40%) clicked on the post. A total of 2,357 respondents with MCDA pregnancies completed the survey. Total 1,928 (82%) were from the United States (US) and 419 (18%) from other countries. Total 85% of patients had co-management with maternal-fetal medicine (MFM), more in the US compared with the rest of the world (87 vs. 74%,  < 0.01). MFM involvement led to increased adherence to biweekly ultrasounds (91 vs. 65%,  < 0.01), diagnosis of monochorionicity by 12 weeks (74 vs. 69%,  < 0.01) and better education about twin-twin transfusion syndrome (90 vs. 66%,  < 0.01). Pregnancies with MFM involvement had a higher take-home baby rate for both babies (92 vs. 89%,  < 0.01) or for at least one baby (98 vs. 93%,  < 0.01) compared with those without MFM involvement.

CONCLUSION

A survey distributed via social media can be effective in evaluating real-life management and outcomes of an uncommon obstetrical diagnosis. This survey elucidates wide international variation in adherence to guidelines, management, and outcomes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估社交媒体在分发单绒毛膜-双羊膜(MCDA)妊娠管理和结局差异患者调查中的效用。

研究设计

2018 年 4 月 2 日至 2018 年 6 月 26 日,在社交媒体网站 Facebook 上的一个英文 MCDA 双胞胎患者为中心的支持组中发布了一项横断面调查。通过一种称为“滚雪球”的技术招募受试者,即个人分享调查以协助招募。使用卡方检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验分析患者报告数据,以探讨与区域和提供者类型相关的与监测和结局相关的特征。

结果

在 3 个月内,该帖子“覆盖”了 14288 名 Facebook 用户,其中 5653 名(40%)点击了该帖子。共有 2357 名 MCDA 妊娠患者完成了调查。其中 1928 名(82%)来自美国(US),419 名(18%)来自其他国家。85%的患者与母体胎儿医学(MFM)共同管理,美国的比例高于其他国家(87%比 74%,<0.01)。MFM 参与导致更严格地遵循两周一次的超声检查(91%比 65%,<0.01)、12 周时诊断为单绒毛膜性(74%比 69%,<0.01)以及更好地了解双胎输血综合征(90%比 66%,<0.01)。有 MFM 参与的妊娠,两个婴儿(92%比 89%,<0.01)或至少一个婴儿(98%比 93%,<0.01)的活产率更高,而没有 MFM 参与的妊娠则更低。

结论

通过社交媒体分发的调查可以有效地评估一种罕见产科诊断的真实管理和结局。本调查阐明了指南遵守、管理和结局方面的广泛国际差异。

相似文献

1
Novel Use of a Social-Media-Based Survey to Detect Regional Differences in Management of Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twins.利用社交媒体调查发现监测单绒毛膜-双羊膜性双胎的管理中的区域性差异的新方法。
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jul;37(9):890-897. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1701027. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Prospective Validation of First-Trimester Ultrasound Characteristics as Predictive Tools for Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome and Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies.前瞻性验证早孕期超声特征作为预测一胎双羊绒毛膜性双胎妊娠中双胎输血综合征和选择性胎儿生长受限的工具。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020;47(4):321-327. doi: 10.1159/000504049. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
3
The Outcome of Monochorionic Diamniotic Twins Discordant at 11 to 13+6 Weeks' Gestation.孕11至13⁺⁶周时单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎不一致的结局
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016 Dec;19(6):692-696. doi: 10.1017/thg.2016.81. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
4
Delivery of monochorionic twins: lessons learned from the Twin Birth Study.单绒毛膜双胎分娩:来自双胎出生研究的经验教训。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;223(6):916.e1-916.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.06.048. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
5
The incidence of unexpected critical complications in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies according to the interval period between ultrasonographic evaluations.根据超声评估间隔期,单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠中意外严重并发症的发生率。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Feb;45(2):318-324. doi: 10.1111/jog.13827. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
Aortic distensibility as a surrogate for intertwin pulse pressure differences in monochorionic pregnancies with and without twin-twin transfusion syndrome.主动脉扩张性作为单绒毛膜双胎妊娠有无双胎输血综合征时双胎间脉压差的替代指标。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Aug;48(2):193-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.15836.
7
Outcome of fetoscopic laser ablation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in dichorionic-triamniotic triplets compared with monochorionic-diamniotic twins.双绒毛膜三羊膜囊三胞胎与单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胞胎相比,胎儿镜激光消融治疗双胎输血综合征的结局
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;44(5):545-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.13369.
8
Monochorionic versus dichorionic twins: Are obstetric outcomes always different?单绒毛膜双胎与双绒毛膜双胎:产科结局总是不同吗?
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Jul;36(5):598-601. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1116501. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
9
Twin-twin transfusion syndrome screening and diagnosis in the United States: A triangulation design of patient experiences.美国双胎输血综合征的筛查和诊断:基于患者体验的三角设计。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0200087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200087. eCollection 2018.
10
Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction.预测单纯性双羊膜囊双胎妊娠并发选择性胎儿生长受限的不良妊娠结局。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;53(2):200-207. doi: 10.1002/uog.19078.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancy Management and Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Cross-Sectional Survey.患者报告的单绒毛膜双羊膜囊双胎妊娠管理及新冠疫情期间的经历:一项混合方法横断面调查
J Patient Exp. 2022 Oct 27;9:23743735221133634. doi: 10.1177/23743735221133634. eCollection 2022.
2
Change in practice in gynecologic oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic: a social media survey.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间妇科肿瘤学的实践变化:一项社交媒体调查
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Aug;30(8):1101-1107. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001585. Epub 2020 Jun 7.