• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:输尿管延迟离断新技术]

[Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: novel technique with late dividing of the ureters].

作者信息

Perlin D V, Alexandrov I V, Zippunnikov V P, Shmanev A O

机构信息

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia.

GBUZ Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology, Volgograd, Russia.

出版信息

Urologiia. 2019 Dec 31(6):54-59.

PMID:32003168
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Despite considerable progress during last decade, laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) still remains a complex and time-demanding procedure. The number of patients with baseline chronic kidney diseases has gradually increased.

AIM

to compare the results of our novel technique of LRC with late dividing of the ureters with conventional procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 50 patients with bladder cancer, who underwent to LRC in a single clinic between April 2013 and January 2017, were included in the study. A conventional LRC was performed in 25 patients, while in other 25 cases, a novel technique of LRC was used. In all cases, LRC was done with fully intracorporeal urinary diversion. Statistical analysis was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk test for parametric testing. In order to compare two groups, Student t-test was used for independent samples.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between two groups in average length of procedure, blood loss volume and length of hospital stay. Major intraoperative complications (injury of the rectum) occurred in two patients, one in each group. Both cases were successfully managed intraoperatively. In addition, there were two postoperative complications in each group that required repeat intervention. The mean serum creatinine level on the 2nd day after surgery was significantly higher after conventional LRC (171.6 and 147.7 mol/L), while glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower (58 and 72 ml/min/1.73 m2), compared to group of novel technique of LRC with late dividing of the ureters. A total of four patients in group of conventional LRC and two patients in group of novel technique had cancer progression. Two patients (one in each group) died because of cancer progression after 15 and 34 months after surgery. The mean follow-up was 25.6 (12-39) months after LRC with late dividing of the ureters and 33.2 (18-48) months in group of standard LRC.

CONCLUSION

LRC with late dividing of the ureters allow to prevent prolonged contact of hyperosmolar and, in some cases, non-sterile urine with peritoneum and decrease inflammation and risk of postoperative adhesions. Using of novel technique may decrease rate of perioperative nephropathy, which is especially important in patients with decreased renal function (single functioning kidney, hydronephrosis, diabetes, renal failure, adjuvant chemotherapy). However, more procedures and longer follow-up period are necessary in order to evaluate ontological results of the novel technique.

摘要

引言

尽管在过去十年中取得了显著进展,但腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术(LRC)仍然是一个复杂且耗时的手术。基线慢性肾脏病患者的数量逐渐增加。

目的

比较我们采用输尿管延迟离断的新型LRC技术与传统手术的结果。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2013年4月至2017年1月在单一诊所接受LRC的50例膀胱癌患者。25例患者接受传统LRC,另外25例采用新型LRC技术。所有病例均采用完全体内尿流改道。使用Shapiro-Wilk检验进行参数检验的统计分析。为比较两组,采用独立样本的Student t检验。

结果

两组在平均手术时长、失血量和住院时间方面无显著差异。主要术中并发症(直肠损伤)发生在2例患者中,每组各1例。两例均在术中成功处理。此外,每组各有2例术后并发症需要再次干预。与采用输尿管延迟离断的新型LRC技术组相比,传统LRC术后第2天的平均血清肌酐水平显著更高(分别为171.6和147.7 μmol/L),而肾小球滤过率显著更低(分别为58和72 ml/min/1.73 m²)。传统LRC组共有4例患者和新型技术组2例患者出现癌症进展。2例患者(每组各1例)在术后15个月和34个月因癌症进展死亡。采用输尿管延迟离断的LRC术后平均随访时间为25.6(12 - 39)个月,标准LRC组为33.2(18 - 48)个月。

结论

输尿管延迟离断的LRC可避免高渗且在某些情况下非无菌尿液与腹膜的长时间接触,减少炎症和术后粘连风险。采用新技术可能降低围手术期肾病的发生率,这在肾功能减退的患者(单肾功能、肾积水、糖尿病、肾衰竭、辅助化疗)中尤为重要。然而,为评估新技术的肿瘤学结果,需要更多手术病例和更长的随访期。

相似文献

1
[Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: novel technique with late dividing of the ureters].[腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:输尿管延迟离断新技术]
Urologiia. 2019 Dec 31(6):54-59.
2
Two-Port Approach Compared to Standard Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy.双端口入路与标准腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的比较
J Endourol. 2015 Sep;29(9):1030-7. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0161. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
3
[Clinical experiences of laparoscopic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in the elderly patients with bladder cancer].老年膀胱癌患者腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术及尿流改道的临床经验
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 9;99(14):1101-1105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.14.013.
4
Efficiency and Safety of Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer, and Postoperative Recurrence.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术治疗肌层浸润性膀胱癌的疗效和安全性,以及术后复发情况。
Arch Esp Urol. 2023 May;76(3):196-202. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237603.23.
5
Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy Versus Extraperitoneal Radical Cystectomy: Is the Extraperitoneal Technique Rewarding?腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术与腹膜外根治性膀胱切除术:腹膜外技术是否值得采用?
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2015 Aug;13(4):e271-e277. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.01.006. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
6
Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a safe and effective procedure for patients with bladder cancer compared to laparoscopic and open surgery: Perioperative outcomes of a single-center experience.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术与腹腔镜和开放手术相比,是一种安全有效的治疗膀胱癌的方法:单中心经验的围手术期结果。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
7
Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit diversion: five cases with a 2-year follow-up.腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术联合体内回肠膀胱术:5例患者的2年随访
BJU Int. 2002 Sep;90(4):391-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02954.x.
8
Laparoscopic Cystectomy with Totally Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Orthotopic Neobladder for Bladder Cancer: A Single Center Experience.腹腔镜膀胱肿瘤根治术加完全腔内法与传统外科技能行原位新膀胱术治疗膀胱癌:单中心经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Jun;32(6):659-667. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0519. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
9
[Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with enteric urinary diversion. Alternative to open cystectomy?].[腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术加肠道尿流改道术。开放性膀胱切除术的替代方案?]
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2005 Jan-Feb;100(1):41-6.
10
Does previous abdominal surgery adversely affect perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic radical cystectomy?既往腹部手术是否会对腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结果产生不利影响?
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan 17;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1317-6.