• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复杂高危和指征性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗稳定型心绞痛:术者手术量是否影响患者预后?

Complex high-risk and indicated percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina: Does operator volume influence patient outcome?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2020 Apr;222:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.12.019. Epub 2020 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2019.12.019
PMID:32004796
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Complex high-risk and indicated revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) is an emerging concept that is poorly studied.

OBJECTIVE

To define temporal changes in CHIP-PCI volumes, and the relationship between operator CHIP-PCI volume and patient outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were analyzed on all CHIP-PCI procedures undertaken for stable angina in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. Operator volume data was available for 2012-14. CHIP-PCI was defined by patient characteristics (age ≥80years, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction <30%, previous CABG, or chronic renal failure) and/or by procedural characteristics (left main PCI, chronic total occlusion PCI, LV support, use of rotational atherectomy or laser atherectomy). CHIP-PCI as a percentage of total PCI increased from 28.1% in 2007 to 36.2% in 2014 (P < .001). Between 2012 and 2014, a total of 30,268 CHIP-PCI cases were performed. Total operator volume varied from 1 to 580 cases with median total operator volume of 29 cases. Higher operator volumes were associated with a greater degree of patient comorbidity and increasing procedural complexity. After adjustment for baseline difference, in-hospital major bleeding (P < .001 for trend), access site complications (P < .001) and coronary perforation (P = .002) were associated with increasing operator CHIP-PCI volumes. However, the frequency of in-hospital death (P = .394) and 12-month mortality (P = .638) were similar across the volume quartiles. Higher volumes quartiles were associated with a greater likelihood of same day discharge (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

CHIP-PCI cases are an increasingly large population in contemporary PCI practice. Higher operator volumes were not associated with improved 12-month survival.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

Data were analyzed on all complex high-risk and indicated revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) procedures in England and Wales between 2007 and 2014. CHIP-PCI as a percentage of total PCI increased from 28.1% in 2007 to 36.2% in 2014 (P < .001). Median total operator volume was 29 cases with higher volumes associated with more patient comorbidity and increasing procedural complexity. In-hospital major bleeding (P < .001 for trend), access site complications (P < .001) and coronary perforation (P = .002) all associated with increasing operator CHIP-PCI volumes. However, trends for in-hospital death (P = .394), and 12-month mortality (P = .638) were similar across the volume quartiles.

摘要

背景

复杂高危和有指征的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(CHIP-PCI)是一个新兴的概念,研究甚少。

目的

定义 CHIP-PCI 量的时间变化,以及术者 CHIP-PCI 量与患者结局之间的关系。

方法和结果

分析了 2007 年至 2014 年期间英格兰和威尔士稳定型心绞痛患者所有接受的 CHIP-PCI 手术的数据。2012-2014 年可获得术者量数据。CHIP-PCI 由患者特征(年龄≥80 岁、左心室射血分数<30%、既往 CABG 或慢性肾功能衰竭)和/或手术特征(左主干 PCI、慢性完全闭塞 PCI、左心室支持、使用旋磨或激光旋磨)定义。2007 年 CHIP-PCI 占总 PCI 的 28.1%,2014 年增至 36.2%(P<0.001)。2012 年至 2014 年,共进行了 30268 例 CHIP-PCI。术者总量从 1 例到 580 例不等,中位数为 29 例。术者量越大,患者合并症越多,手术难度越大。在调整基线差异后,住院期间大出血(趋势 P<0.001)、入路部位并发症(趋势 P<0.001)和冠状动脉穿孔(P=0.002)与术者 CHIP-PCI 量增加相关。然而,住院期间死亡(P=0.394)和 12 个月死亡率(P=0.638)在各四分位组间相似。较高的四分位组与更高的当天出院率相关(P<0.001)。

结论

CHIP-PCI 病例是当代 PCI 实践中越来越大的人群。术者量增加与 12 个月生存率的提高无关。

相似文献

1
Complex high-risk and indicated percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina: Does operator volume influence patient outcome?复杂高危和指征性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗稳定型心绞痛:术者手术量是否影响患者预后?
Am Heart J. 2020 Apr;222:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.12.019. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Are Higher Operator Volumes for Unprotected Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Associated With Improved Patient Outcomes?: A Survival Analysis of 6724 Procedures From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society National Database.更高的无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入术(ULMCA)手术量与改善患者预后相关吗?:来自英国心血管介入学会国家数据库的 6724 例手术的生存分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun;13(6):e008782. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008782.
3
Access Site and Outcomes for Unprotected Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database.无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的入路和结果:英国心血管介入学会数据库分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 24;11(24):2480-2491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.035.
4
Vascular Access Site and Outcomes in 58,870 Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Previous History of Coronary Bypass Surgery: Results From the British Cardiovascular Interventions Society National Database.58870 例行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中血管入路部位和结局的研究:来自英国心血管介入学会国家数据库的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 12;11(5):482-492. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.12.020.
5
Relationship Between Operator Volume and Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.术者手术量与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期结局的关系。
Circulation. 2019 Jan 22;139(4):458-472. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033325.
6
Operator Volumes and In-Hospital Outcomes: An Analysis of 7,740 Rotational Atherectomy Procedures From the BCIS National Database.术者操作量与院内结局:BCIS 国家数据库中 7740 例旋磨术的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 12;14(13):1423-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.034. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
7
Procedural Volume and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery DiseaseReport From the National Clinical Data (J-PCI Registry).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的操作量和结局:来自全国临床数据(J-PCI 注册研究)的报告。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e015404. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015404. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
8
Procedural Success and Outcomes With Increasing Use of Enabling Strategies for Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention.随着慢性完全闭塞介入治疗中启用策略的使用增加,手术成功率和结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct;11(10):e006436. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.006436.
9
Legacy Effect of Coronary Perforation Complicating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusive Disease: An Analysis of 26 807 Cases From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database.慢性完全闭塞病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发冠状动脉穿孔的后遗症:英国心血管介入学会数据库 26807 例分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 May;10(5). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004642.
10
Outcomes of PCI in Relation to Procedural Characteristics and Operator Volumes in the United States.美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的疗效与手术特征及术者手术量的关系
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 20;69(24):2913-2924. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.032.

引用本文的文献

1
High-Risk Factors of In-Hospital Death Following Complex High-risk and Indicated Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.体外膜肺氧合支持下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后复杂高危及特定患者院内死亡的高危因素
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 26;26(5):27126. doi: 10.31083/RCM27126. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Application of Drug-Coated Balloons in Complex High Risk and Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.药物涂层球囊在复杂高危及特定经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb;105(2):494-516. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31316. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
3
Complex and high-risk intervention in indicated patients (CHIP) in contemporary clinical practice.
当代临床实践中的有指征患者的复杂高风险干预(CHIP)。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Jul;38(3):269-274. doi: 10.1007/s12928-023-00930-1. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
4
Clinical expert consensus document on the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices during complex high-risk PCI in India using a standardised algorithm.印度使用标准化算法在复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间使用经皮左心室辅助装置的临床专家共识文件。
AsiaIntervention. 2022 Oct 6;8(2):75-85. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-22-00021. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Impella支持的高风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的出血风险综述
Heart Int. 2020 Dec 29;14(2):92-99. doi: 10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.92. eCollection 2020.
6
Complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention types, trends, and in-hospital outcomes among different age groups: An insight from a national registry.不同年龄段患者接受复杂高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗类型、趋势及院内结局:来自全国注册登记研究的分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(5):711-720. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30366. Epub 2022 Sep 2.
7
Complex Coronary Interventions: Are We Reaching a Plateau?复杂冠状动脉介入治疗:我们是否已达到平台期?
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 8;12(8):1298. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081298.
8
Rotational atherectomy of calcified coronary lesions: current practice and insights from two randomized trials.旋转切割术治疗钙化冠状动脉病变:两项随机试验的现状及启示。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Sep;112(9):1143-1163. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02013-2. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
9
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions by Single or Multiple Operators: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.接受单名或多名术者行高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的临床特征和结局:来自退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和跟踪计划的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e022131. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022131. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
10
Impact of Operator Volumes and Experience on Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后术者手术量和经验对结局的影响:来自退伍军人事务部临床评估、报告和跟踪(CART)计划的见解。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Jul;40:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 6.