• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?横切口与纵切口用于计划性剖宫产子宫切除术:有区别吗?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2768-7.
2
Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Pfannenstiel and Midline Skin Incisions in Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: Single-Center Experience.胎盘植入谱系疾病中经 Pfannenstiel 切口和中线皮肤切口的术中及术后结局:单中心经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 5;60(7):1102. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071102.
3
Importance of the gynecologic oncologist in management of cesarean hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS).妇科肿瘤学家在胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS)剖宫产子宫切除术中的管理作用
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Sep;166(3):460-464. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.06.025. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
4
Suspected placenta accreta and cesarean hysterectomy: observational cohort utilizing an intraoperative decision strategy.疑似胎盘植入与剖宫产子宫切除术:采用术中决策策略的观察性队列研究
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Mar;198:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.020. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
5
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in transverse and vertical skin incision for placenta previa : Skin incision for placenta previa.横切口与纵切口行前置胎盘剖宫产术的母婴结局:前置胎盘的剖宫产术式。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03923-1.
6
Neuraxial to general anesthesia conversion has equitable intraoperative and improved post-operative outcomes compared to general anesthesia in cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).与全麻相比,在胎盘植入谱系(PAS)行剖宫产子宫切除术时,转为脊麻-全麻联合麻醉在术中及术后转归方面具有同等优势。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):8640-8644. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1990885. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
7
Parallel transverse uterine incisions, a novel approach for managing heavy hemorrhage and preserving the uterus: A retrospective cohort study for patients with anterior placenta previa and accreta.平行横向子宫切口:一种治疗严重出血并保留子宫的新方法:一项针对前置胎盘合并植入患者的回顾性队列研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17742. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017742.
8
Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization: the PASTIME protocol.术中多血管栓塞治疗胎盘植入谱系疾病:PASTIME方案
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):442.e1-442.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
9
Reloadable Stapler Use during Peripartum Hysterectomy for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Novel Surgical Technique and Case Series.可重复使用的装订器在胎盘植入谱系患者剖宫产子宫切除术中的应用:一种新的手术技术和病例系列。
Am J Perinatol. 2022 Feb;39(3):265-271. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715464. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Outcomes following a clinical algorithm allowing for delayed hysterectomy in the management of severe placenta accreta spectrum.在严重胎盘植入谱系疾病管理中采用延迟子宫切除术的临床算法后的结果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Feb;222(2):179.e1-179.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.035. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Pfannenstiel and Midline Skin Incisions in Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: Single-Center Experience.胎盘植入谱系疾病中经 Pfannenstiel 切口和中线皮肤切口的术中及术后结局:单中心经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 5;60(7):1102. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071102.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of routine ureteral stents in cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta.在胎盘植入的剖宫产子宫切除术时常规使用输尿管支架。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb;34(3):386-389. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1609935. Epub 2019 May 2.
2
Evidence-based guidelines for the management of abnormally invasive placenta: recommendations from the International Society for Abnormally Invasive Placenta.异常性胎盘植入管理的循证指南:国际异常性胎盘植入学会的推荐意见。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;220(6):511-526. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.054. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
3
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 764: Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.764:医学指征的晚期早产儿和早期足月产儿分娩。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;133(2):e151-e155. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003083.
4
Obstetric Care Consensus No. 7: Placenta Accreta Spectrum.产科保健共识第 7 号:胎盘植入谱系疾病。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e259-e275. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002983.
5
Role of interventional radiology in pregnancy complicated by placenta accreta spectrum disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.介入放射学在胎盘植入综合征合并妊娠中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):743-751. doi: 10.1002/uog.20131.
6
Association of Implementing a Multidisciplinary Team Approach in the Management of Morbidly Adherent Placenta With Maternal Morbidity and Mortality.多学科团队方法在病态黏附胎盘管理中应用与母婴发病率和死亡率的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;132(5):1167-1176. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002865.
7
Placenta Accreta Spectrum.胎盘植入谱系疾病
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 19;378(16):1529-1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1709324.
8
Anesthesia Duration as an Independent Risk Factor for Early Postoperative Complications in Adults Undergoing Elective ACDF.麻醉持续时间作为择期前路颈椎间盘切除融合术成年患者术后早期并发症的独立危险因素。
Global Spine J. 2017 Dec;7(8):727-734. doi: 10.1177/2192568217701105. Epub 2017 May 31.
9
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #44: Management of bleeding in the late preterm period.母胎医学会(SMFM)咨询系列第 44 号:晚期早产儿出血的管理。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):B2-B8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
10
Practice Bulletin No. 183: Postpartum Hemorrhage.实践公告第 183 号:产后出血。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;130(4):e168-e186. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002351.

横切口与纵切口用于计划性剖宫产子宫切除术:有区别吗?

Transverse versus vertical skin incision for planned cesarean hysterectomy: does it matter?

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Room 27-139 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1740, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 31;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2768-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-020-2768-7
PMID:32005190
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6995109/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate differences in perioperative outcomes by type of skin incision, transverse versus vertical, for planned cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent a planned cesarean hysterectomy for abnormal placentation at a single academic medical center over 5 years. The Student's t-test was used for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test compared categorical variables. Continuous data were presented as median and compared using the Wilcoxon-rank sum test.

RESULTS

Forty-two planned cesarean hysterectomies were identified. A transverse skin incision was made in 43% (n = 18); a vertical skin incision was made in 57% (n = 24). Skin incision was independent of BMI (30.3 vs 30.8 kg/m, p = 0.37), placental location (p = 0.82), and PAS-subtype (p = 0.26). Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 2.73 l (L) (range 0.5-20) and was not significantly different between transverse and vertical skin incision (2.6 L vs 2.8 L, p = 0.8). There was significantly shorter operative time with transverse skin incision (180 vs 238 min, p = 0.03), with no difference in intraoperative complications, including cystotomy (p = 0.22) and ureteral injury (p = 0.73). Postoperatively, there was no difference in maternal length of stay (4.8 vs 4.4 days, p = 0.74) or post-operative opioid use (117 vs 180 morphine equivalents, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

Transverse skin incision is associated with shorter operative time for patients undergoing planned cesarean hysterectomy. There was no difference in EBL, intraoperative complications, postoperative length of stay, or opioid use. Given an increasing rate of cesarean hysterectomy, we should consider variables that optimize maternal outcomes and resource utilization.

摘要

背景

为了研究胎盘植入谱系(PAS)计划剖宫产子宫切除术中横切口与纵切口的围手术期结局差异。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了在一家学术医疗中心接受计划剖宫产子宫切除术的所有因异常胎盘植入的患者,研究时间为 5 年。使用学生 t 检验比较连续变量,使用 Fisher 确切检验比较分类变量。连续数据以中位数表示,并使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验进行比较。

结果

共确定了 42 例计划剖宫产子宫切除术。横切口占 43%(n=18),纵切口占 57%(n=24)。切口类型与 BMI(30.3 与 30.8kg/m,p=0.37)、胎盘位置(p=0.82)和 PAS 亚型(p=0.26)无关。估计失血量(EBL)均值为 2.73L(范围 0.5-20),横切口与纵切口之间无显著差异(2.6L 与 2.8L,p=0.8)。横切口手术时间明显缩短(180 分钟与 238 分钟,p=0.03),术中并发症(包括膀胱切开术,p=0.22 和输尿管损伤,p=0.73)无差异。术后,母亲的住院时间(4.8 天与 4.4 天,p=0.74)和术后阿片类药物使用量(117 毫克吗啡当量与 180 毫克吗啡当量,p=0.31)无差异。

结论

对于接受计划剖宫产子宫切除术的患者,横切口与较短的手术时间相关。EBL、术中并发症、术后住院时间或阿片类药物使用无差异。鉴于剖宫产子宫切除术的发生率不断增加,我们应该考虑优化母婴结局和资源利用的变量。