The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Antalya 07070, Türkiye.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 5;60(7):1102. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071102.
We compared Pfannenstiel and midline skin incisions for cesarean hysterectomy in women with confirmed Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of Pfannenstiel and midline skin incisions in women undergoing cesarean section hysterectomy for suspected placenta accreta at Akdeniz University Hospital between January 2010 and February 2022. Histopathological confirmation was obtained for all cases. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative data, along with neonatal outcomes, were extracted from the hospital's electronic database. Possible complaints related to the incision site or other issues (e.g., vaginal dryness or sexual life) were identified through telephone interviews. Subjects were stratified into Pfannenstiel and midline incision cohorts, with subsequent data comparison. Data from 67 women with a histopathologically confirmed PAS diagnosis were analyzed. Of these, 49 (73.1%) underwent Pfannenstiel incision, and 18 (26.9%) had a midline skin incision. Incisions were based on the surgeon's experience. Pfannenstiel incision was more common in antepartum hemorrhage, preoperative hemorrhage, and emergency surgery ( = 0.02, = 0.014, = 0.002, respectively). Hypogastric artery ligation occurred in 30 cases (61.2%) in the Pfannenstiel group but none in the midline group. Cosmetic dissatisfaction and sexual problems were more prevalent in the midline group ( < 0.05, all). Preoperative and postoperative blood parameters, transfused blood products, and neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups. Relaparotomy, bladder injury, blood loss, and need for blood transfusion were more prevalent in the Pfannenstiel group, while greater dissatisfaction with the incision was observed in the midline incision group. Midline incision seems to be more favorable in patients with Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS). Patients may be informed regarding the worse cosmetic outcomes and possible sexual problems related to vaginal dryness when midline laparotomy is planned. But before opting for a Pfannenstiel incision, patients should receive comprehensive information regarding the potential risks of relaparotomy and bladder injury.
我们比较了经 Pfannenstiel 切口和中线切口行剖宫产子宫切除术治疗经确认的胎盘植入谱系疾病(Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders,PAS)患者的效果。这项回顾性队列研究评估了 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 2 月期间在阿克登兹大学医院因疑似胎盘植入而行剖宫产子宫切除术的患者中 Pfannenstiel 切口和中线切口的结局。所有病例均获得组织病理学证实。从医院的电子数据库中提取人口统计学、围手术期和术后数据以及新生儿结局。通过电话访谈确定与切口部位相关的可能投诉或其他问题(例如,阴道干燥或性生活)。将受试者分为 Pfannenstiel 切口组和中线切口组,然后进行数据比较。共分析了 67 例经组织病理学证实 PAS 诊断的患者数据。其中 49 例(73.1%)行 Pfannenstiel 切口,18 例(26.9%)行中线皮肤切口。切口选择基于外科医生的经验。Pfannenstiel 切口更常见于产前出血、术前出血和急诊手术( = 0.02, = 0.014, = 0.002)。Pfannenstiel 组有 30 例(61.2%)行腹下动脉结扎,而中线组无一例。中线组的美容满意度和性问题更常见(<0.05,均)。两组的术前和术后血液参数、输血量和新生儿结局相似。Pfannenstiel 组的再次剖腹手术、膀胱损伤、出血量和输血需求更常见,而中线切口组对切口的不满更明显。中线切口似乎在胎盘植入谱系疾病(PAS)患者中更为有利。当计划行中线剖腹术时,可能会告知患者较差的美容效果和可能与阴道干燥相关的性问题。但在选择 Pfannenstiel 切口之前,患者应全面了解再次剖腹手术和膀胱损伤的潜在风险。