Ideal Medical Technologies, 18 N Kensington Rd, Asheville, NC, 28804, USA.
Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Eugeniavägen 3, 171 76, Solna, Sweden.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Apr;35(2):317-325. doi: 10.1007/s10877-020-00474-2. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
Intensive care unit (ICU) patients develop stress induced insulin resistance causing hyperglycemia, large glucose variability and hypoglycemia. These glucose metrics have all been associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. The only way to achieve safe glucose control at a lower glucose range (e.g., 4.4-6.6 mmol/L) will be through use of an autonomous closed loop glucose control system (artificial pancreas). Our goal with the present study was to assess the safety and performance of an artificial pancreas system, composed of the EIRUS (Maquet Critical Care AB) continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and novel artificial intelligence-based glucose control software, in a swine model using unannounced hypo- and hyperglycemia challenges. Fourteen piglets (6 control, 8 treated) underwent sequential unannounced hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic challenges with 3 IU of NovoRapid and a glucose infusion at 17 mg/kg/min over the course of 5 h. In the Control animals an experienced ICU physician used every 30-min blood glucose values to maintain control to a range of 4.4-9 mmol/L. In the Treated group the artificial pancreas system attempted to maintain blood glucose control to a range of 4.4-6.6 mmol/L. Five of six Control animals and none of eight Treated animals experienced severe hypoglycemia (< 2.22 mmol/L). The area under the curve 3.5 mmol/L was 28.9 (21.1-54.2) for Control and 4.8 (3.1-5.2) for the Treated animals. The total percent time within tight glucose control range, 4.4-6.6 mmol/L, was 32.8% (32.4-47.1) for Controls and 55.4% (52.9-59.4) for Treated (p < 0.034). Data are median and quartiles. The artificial pancreas system abolished severe hypoglycemia and outperformed the experienced ICU physician in avoiding clinically significant hypoglycemic excursions.
重症监护病房(ICU)患者会出现应激诱导的胰岛素抵抗,导致高血糖、血糖波动大以及低血糖。这些血糖指标均与发病率和死亡率的增加有关。要在较低的血糖范围内(例如 4.4-6.6mmol/L)实现安全的血糖控制,唯一的方法是使用自主闭环血糖控制系统(人工胰腺)。我们目前的研究目的是评估一种人工胰腺系统的安全性和性能,该系统由 EIRUS(Maquet Critical Care AB)连续血糖监测仪(CGM)和新型基于人工智能的血糖控制软件组成,在使用未通知的低血糖和高血糖挑战的猪模型中进行测试。14 头小猪(6 头对照,8 头治疗)接受了连续的未通知的低血糖和高血糖挑战,在 5 小时内使用 3IU 的诺和锐和 17mg/kg/min 的葡萄糖输注。在对照动物中,一位经验丰富的 ICU 医生使用每 30 分钟的血糖值将血糖控制在 4.4-9mmol/L 的范围内。在治疗组中,人工胰腺系统试图将血糖控制在 4.4-6.6mmol/L 的范围内。在对照组的 6 只动物中有 5 只和在治疗组的 8 只动物中没有 1 只出现严重低血糖(<2.22mmol/L)。血糖控制在 3.5mmol/L 时,对照组的 AUC 为 28.9(21.1-54.2),治疗组为 4.8(3.1-5.2)。在严格的血糖控制范围内(4.4-6.6mmol/L),对照组的总时间百分比为 32.8%(32.4-47.1),治疗组为 55.4%(52.9-59.4)(p<0.034)。数据为中位数和四分位数。人工胰腺系统消除了严重的低血糖,并在避免临床显著的低血糖波动方面优于经验丰富的 ICU 医生。