• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

到达急诊科时出现的不良事件:急诊科作为双重安全网。

Adverse Events Present on Arrival to the Emergency Department: The ED as a Dual Safety Net.

作者信息

Griffey Richard T, Schneider Ryan M, Todorov Alexandre A

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Apr;46(4):192-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.12.003
PMID:32007399
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The emergency department (ED) is the natural venue for the provision of acute unscheduled care. However, little is known about the nature and proportion of this care that goes to addressing adverse events (AEs)-physical injury to a patient due to health care that requires some intervention-that are present on arrival (POA) to the ED. Described here are AEs that are POA, and population prevalence estimates for these events.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study tested the ED Trigger Tool, using data from an urban academic medical center. Patients aged ≥18 completing an ED visit were eligible (N = 92,859). A total of 5,582 visits with triggers (findings that increase the likelihood of an AE) were reviewed using the two-tier trigger approach. AEs were categorized by severity, type, and whether they were POA. POA AEs, and sociodemographic and trigger associations with AEs are described.

RESULTS

Of 1,181 AEs identified, 718 (60.8%) were POA to the ED. Patients with POA AEs were more often white (51.1% vs. 39.7%, p < 0.001) and older (median age 62 vs. 50, p < 0.001). The majority of POA AEs were medication-related and patient care-related events. In the population at this center, POA AEs account for an estimated 7.6% of ED visits (95% confidence interval = 6.9%-8.2%).

CONCLUSION

In this single-center study, the majority of AEs detected using the ED Trigger Tool were POA. These findings highlight the importance of the ED as a safety net for harm occurring across the health system.

摘要

背景

急诊科是提供急性非预约护理的自然场所。然而,对于在患者到达急诊科时就已存在的不良事件(即因医疗保健导致的需要某种干预的身体损伤),这种护理的性质和比例却知之甚少。本文描述了到达时即存在的不良事件以及这些事件在人群中的患病率估计。

方法

这项回顾性观察研究使用了一家城市学术医疗中心的数据对急诊科触发工具进行测试。年龄≥18岁且完成急诊科就诊的患者符合条件(N = 92,859)。采用两层触发方法对总共5,582次有触发因素(增加不良事件可能性的发现)的就诊进行了审查。不良事件按严重程度、类型以及是否在到达时即存在进行分类。描述了到达时即存在的不良事件以及社会人口统计学因素和触发因素与不良事件的关联。

结果

在识别出的1,181例不良事件中,718例(60.8%)在到达急诊科时即已存在。到达时即存在不良事件的患者更常为白人(51.1%对39.7%,p < 0.001)且年龄更大(中位年龄62岁对50岁,p < 0.001)。大多数到达时即存在的不良事件是与药物相关和与患者护理相关的事件。在该中心的人群中,到达时即存在的不良事件估计占急诊科就诊的7.6%(95%置信区间 = 6.9% - 8.2%)。

结论

在这项单中心研究中,使用急诊科触发工具检测到的大多数不良事件在到达时即已存在。这些发现凸显了急诊科作为整个卫生系统中伤害安全网的重要性。

相似文献

1
Adverse Events Present on Arrival to the Emergency Department: The ED as a Dual Safety Net.到达急诊科时出现的不良事件:急诊科作为双重安全网。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Apr;46(4):192-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
2
Multicenter Test of an Emergency Department Trigger Tool for Detecting Adverse Events.用于检测不良事件的急诊科触发工具的多中心测试
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e843-e849. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000516.
3
Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Patients Account for a Disproportionately High Number of Adverse Events in the Emergency Department.在急诊科,急性后期和长期护理患者的不良事件数量不成比例地高。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):907-912.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.043. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
4
The Emergency Department Trigger Tool: Validation and Testing to Optimize Yield.急诊科触发工具:验证和测试以优化效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1279-1290. doi: 10.1111/acem.14101. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
5
Near-Miss Events Detected Using the Emergency Department Trigger Tool.运用急诊科触发工具检测接近错失事件。
J Patient Saf. 2023 Mar 1;19(2):59-66. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001092. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
6
Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department: consequences for triage.非计划性急诊科复诊:分诊后果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):33-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12052.
7
Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay and Adverse Events among Older Adults with Behavioral Health-Related Emergency Department Visits: A Systematic Medical Record Review.行为健康相关急诊科就诊的老年人住院时间延长和不良事件的预测因素:一项系统性病历回顾
J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):143-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.06.073. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
8
Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States.美国农村和城市人口急诊就诊趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919.
9
The Emergency Department Trigger Tool: A Novel Approach to Screening for Quality and Safety Events.急诊科触发工具:一种筛查质量和安全事件的新方法。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;76(2):230-240. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.032. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
10
The association between a prolonged stay in the emergency department and adverse events in older patients admitted to hospital: a retrospective cohort study.急诊科停留时间延长与老年住院患者不良事件的相关性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):564-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.034926. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Finding Potential Adverse Events in the Unstructured Text of Electronic Health Care Records: Development of the Shakespeare Method.在电子医疗记录的非结构化文本中发现潜在不良事件:莎士比亚方法的开发。
JMIRx Med. 2021 Aug 11;2(3):e27017. doi: 10.2196/27017.
2
Social Determinants of Emergency Department Visits among Persons Diagnosed with Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke.社会决定因素对冠心病和中风患者急诊就诊的影响。
Ethn Dis. 2021 Jan 21;31(1):41-46. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.1.41. eCollection 2021 Winter.