Suppr超能文献

急性周围创伤是否会导致特发性成人发病型肌张力障碍?

Does acute peripheral trauma contribute to idiopathic adult-onset dystonia?

机构信息

Department of Medical Science and Public Health, Institute of Neurology, University of Cagliari, Italy.

IRCCS, Neuromed, Italy; Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020 Feb;71:40-43. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute peripheral trauma is a controversial risk factor for idiopathic dystonia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from the Italian Dystonia Registry regarding the occurrence of acute peripheral trauma severe enough to require medical attention in 1382 patients with adult-onset idiopathic dystonia and 200 patients with acquired adult-onset dystonia.

RESULTS

Patients with idiopathic and acquired dystonia showed a similar burden of peripheral trauma in terms of the number of patients who experienced trauma (115/1382 vs. 12/200, p = 0.3) and the overall number of injuries (145 for the 1382 idiopathic patients and 14 for the 200 patients with secondary dystonia, p = 0.2). Most traumas occurred before the onset of idiopathic or secondary dystonia but only a minority of such injuries (14 in the idiopathic group, 2 in the acquired group, p = 0.6) affected the same body part as that affected by dystonia. In the idiopathic group, the elapsed time between trauma and dystonia onset was 8.1 ± 9.2 years; only six of the 145 traumas (4.1%) experienced by 5/1382 idiopathic patients (0.36%) occurred one year or less before dystonia onset; in the acquired dystonia group, the two patients experienced prior trauma to the dystonic body part 5 and 6 years before dystonia development.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the contribution of peripheral acute trauma to idiopathic dystonia is negligible, if anything, and likely involves only a small subset of patients.

摘要

背景

急性外周创伤是特发性肌张力障碍的一个有争议的危险因素。

材料和方法

我们回顾性分析了意大利肌张力障碍登记处的数据,该数据涉及 1382 例成年起病特发性肌张力障碍患者和 200 例获得性成年起病肌张力障碍患者中发生的严重程度足以需要医疗关注的急性外周创伤。

结果

特发性和获得性肌张力障碍患者的外周创伤负担相似,表现为经历创伤的患者人数(115/1382 与 12/200,p=0.3)和总体受伤人数(1382 例特发性患者中有 145 例,200 例继发性肌张力障碍患者中有 14 例,p=0.2)。大多数创伤发生在特发性或继发性肌张力障碍之前,但只有少数此类损伤(特发性组 14 例,获得性组 2 例,p=0.6)影响与肌张力障碍相同的身体部位。在特发性组中,创伤与肌张力障碍发作之间的时间间隔为 8.1±9.2 年;在 1382 例特发性患者中有 5 例(0.36%)经历了 145 例创伤中的 6 例(4.1%),发生在肌张力障碍发作前一年或更短时间内;在获得性肌张力障碍组中,两名患者在肌张力障碍发生前 5 年和 6 年前经历了对痉挛部位的先前创伤。

讨论和结论

我们的数据表明,外周急性创伤对特发性肌张力障碍的贡献微不足道,如果有的话,可能只涉及一小部分患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验