College of Energy and Power Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China.
Key Laboratory of Ecohydrology of Inland River Basin/Gansu Qilian Mountains Ecology Research Center, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 1;715:136911. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136911. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
The sources of supra-permafrost water and its hydrological effects were studied, based on the presence of stable isotopes in 562 samples collected in different ablation periods from the source regions of the Yangtze River. The δO (δD and d-excess) values for the initial ablation, ablation, and end ablation periods were -10.18‰ (-71.39‰ and 10.08‰), -12.14‰ (-85.58‰ and 11.51‰) and -11.50‰ (-78.75‰ and 13.23‰), respectively. The order of the slopes for the supra-permafrost water evaporation lines from the different ablation periods was initial ablation (IA) > ablation (A) > end ablation (EA). An anti-altitude effect is documented here, for a specific altitude range, in what is believed to be the first record of such an occurrence. Outside of that range, clear altitude effects were apparent. We have been able to show that supra-permafrost water was mainly recharged by atmospheric precipitation, ground ice, and glacier and snow meltwater, in the initial ablation and end ablation periods, and contributions from glacier and snow meltwater were mainly concentrated in higher altitude regions. In contrast, in the ablation period, supra-permafrost water was mainly recharged by atmospheric precipitation and ground ice. The contributions of precipitation to supra-permafrost water were 78.79%, 85.47%, and 82.99% in the initial ablation, ablation, and end ablation periods, respectively. The contributions of ground ice to the supra-permafrost water were 14.05%, 14.53%, and 11.94%, respectively, while contributions of glacier and snow meltwater were 7.15% and 5.07% in the initial and end ablation period. For the initial ablation, ablation, and end ablation periods, contributions from atmospheric precipitation to the supra-permafrost water were 85.47%, 86.86%, and 86.84%, while contributions from ground ice were 14.53%, 13.14% and 13.16%, respectively.
本研究基于长江源区不同消融期采集的 562 个水样的稳定同位素,探讨了超多年冻土水的来源及其水文效应。初始消融期、消融期和终消融期的 δO(δD 和 d-过剩)值分别为-10.18‰(-71.39‰和 10.08‰)、-12.14‰(-85.58‰和 11.51‰)和-11.50‰(-78.75‰和 13.23‰)。不同消融期超多年冻土水蒸发线斜率的顺序为初始消融期(IA)>消融期(A)>终消融期(EA)。在特定的海拔范围内,这里记录了一个反海拔效应,据信这是首次记录到这种现象。在该范围之外,明显存在清晰的海拔效应。我们已经能够表明,在初始消融期和终消融期,超多年冻土水主要由大气降水、地下水冰和冰川融水补给,而冰川融水的贡献主要集中在较高海拔地区。相比之下,在消融期,超多年冻土水主要由大气降水和地下水冰补给。降水对超多年冻土水的贡献分别为初始消融期、消融期和终消融期的 78.79%、85.47%和 82.99%。地下水冰对超多年冻土水的贡献分别为 14.05%、14.53%和 11.94%,而冰川融水的贡献分别为初始和终消融期的 7.15%和 5.07%。对于初始消融期、消融期和终消融期,大气降水对超多年冻土水的贡献分别为 85.47%、86.86%和 86.84%,而地下水冰的贡献分别为 14.53%、13.14%和 13.16%。