Suppr超能文献

基于安慰剂随机临床试验数据的椎体骨折发生率影响因素的Meta 分析。

Investigation of the Influencing Factors on the Incidence of Vertebral Fracture: A Meta-analysis Based on Placebo Data of Randomized Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8641, Japan.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jan;54(1):240-245. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00051-z. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of vertebral fracture is commonly used as a primary endpoint in randomized clinical trials of pharmaceutical agents for osteoporosis. In order to investigate the impact of ethnic/regional difference in osteoporosis clinical trials on the incidence of vertebral fracture, we examined the correlation between the incidence of vertebral fracture in the placebo group and baseline bone mineral density (BMD), ethnic and regional differences, or other factors by meta-regression analysis.

METHODS

We studied a total of 21 trials involving 28,425 patients treated with placebo, which were identified through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

RESULTS

A univariate meta-regression showed a significant correlation between the proportion of subjects experiencing new vertebral fracture and the proportion of Caucasian subjects (coefficient = 0.223, [Formula: see text]), and the proportion of subjects with prevalent vertebral fracture (0.161, [Formula: see text]). Baseline lumbar spine BMD did not show significant correlations. As a result of multivariate meta-regression analysis with the factors with [Formula: see text] by the univariate meta-regression, the proportion of subjects with prevalent vertebral fracture was identified as an influencing factor (0.139, [Formula: see text]).

CONCLUSIONS

The multivariate meta-regression showed that prevalent vertebral fracture was the most important factor to predict subsequent vertebral fracture. In addition, considering the results of the univariate meta-regression analysis, we suggest that the ethnic/regional difference should be considered as one of the important factors that influence the incidence of new vertebral fracture, a primary endpoint of osteoporosis study, when the Caucasian reference range is used in clinical trials.

摘要

背景

椎体骨折的发生率通常被用作骨质疏松症药物临床试验的主要终点。为了研究骨质疏松症临床试验中种族/地区差异对椎体骨折发生率的影响,我们通过荟萃回归分析研究了安慰剂组椎体骨折发生率与基线骨密度(BMD)、种族和地区差异或其他因素之间的相关性。

方法

我们共研究了 21 项涉及 28425 名接受安慰剂治疗的患者的临床试验,这些试验通过 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库确定。

结果

单变量荟萃回归分析显示,新椎体骨折患者比例与白种人受试者比例(系数=0.223,[公式:见文本])和既往椎体骨折患者比例(0.161,[公式:见文本])之间存在显著相关性。基线腰椎 BMD 与结果之间无显著相关性。由于单变量荟萃回归分析中具有[公式:见文本]的因素进行了多元荟萃回归分析,发现既往椎体骨折比例是一个影响因素(0.139,[公式:见文本])。

结论

多元荟萃回归显示,既往椎体骨折是预测随后椎体骨折的最重要因素。此外,考虑到单变量荟萃回归分析的结果,我们建议在临床试验中使用白人参考范围时,应将种族/地区差异视为影响骨质疏松症研究主要终点即新椎体骨折发生率的重要因素之一。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验