Suppr超能文献

晚期临床试验过早结论的原因:对 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册的 III 期临床试验的分析。

Reasons for Premature Conclusion of Late Phase Clinical Trials: An Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov Registered Phase III Trials.

机构信息

Program for Regulatory Science & Medicine, Georgetown University, 2115 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 603, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.

Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jan;54(1):232-239. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00050-0. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Confirmatory phase III trials aim to provide decisive evidence about a medical product's safety and efficacy. Although these trials are planned and conducted based on accumulated knowledge, they are not without risk or uncertainty. A trial prematurely concluding contributes to great loss in both financial and human research resources.

METHODS

We categorized and evaluated trials concluded prematurely after recruitment had begun, as registered in Clinical Trials.gov between January 2013 and August 2017.

RESULTS

We found 9828 registered interventional phase III trials; of those, 320 were concluded prematurely. Many clinical trials were concluded prematurely for reasons related to reducing participant risk, such as interim stopping for safety, efficacy, or futility. Yet, 70% trials were halted for other reasons, such as insufficient recruitment (the most often cited reason) or unspecified business decisions. Of all prematurely concluded trials, 102 trials evaluated 72 different novel therapeutics; in 66.7% of these trials, the clinical development program was stopped entirely. Most of the prematurely concluded trials (78%) had not provided results to ClinicalTrials.gov at the time of this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of the factors that influence premature conclusion could inform solutions for improving research participation and help ensure trial completion. Registering and reporting results acknowledges the voluntary contribution and consent expectations of research participants.

摘要

背景

确证性 III 期临床试验旨在提供关于医疗产品安全性和疗效的决定性证据。尽管这些试验是基于积累的知识进行计划和实施的,但它们并非没有风险或不确定性。试验过早结束会导致财务和人力资源研究的巨大损失。

方法

我们对 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 8 月期间在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册的已开始招募但提前结束的试验进行了分类和评估。

结果

我们发现 9828 项注册的干预性 III 期临床试验;其中 320 项提前结束。许多临床试验因降低参与者风险而提前结束,例如出于安全性、疗效或无效性的中期停止。然而,70%的试验因其他原因而停止,如招募不足(最常被引用的原因)或未指明的商业决策。在所有提前结束的试验中,有 102 项试验评估了 72 种不同的新型治疗方法;在这些试验中,66.7%的临床试验开发项目完全停止。在本分析时,大多数提前结束的试验(78%)尚未向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提供结果。

结论

评估影响提前结束的因素可以为改善研究参与提供解决方案,并有助于确保试验完成。注册和报告结果承认了研究参与者的自愿贡献和同意期望。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验