• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机断层扫描血管造影术与数字减影血管造影术在下肢严重缺血中的比较

Comparison Between Computed Tomography Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Critical Lower Limb Ischemia.

作者信息

Al-Rudaini Hesham Ebrahim Ahmed, Han Ping, Liang Huimin

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Union Hospital, Wuhan, 430030, China.

出版信息

Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2019;15(5):496-503. doi: 10.2174/1573405614666181026112532.

DOI:10.2174/1573405614666181026112532
PMID:32008557
Abstract

BACKGROUND

CT Angiography (CTA) of aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries is a relatively recent innovation of CT imaging that has changed after the introduction of multi-detector row scanners.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Multidetector Computed Tomographic Angiography (MDCTA) in the assessment of arterial tree in patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease (PAOD), as compared to Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA).

METHODS

A single-center nonrandomized prospective study was conducted on 50 patients complaining of peripheral arterial disease (chronic stage) from February 2017 to October 2017. All the patients were exposed to DSA and CTA prior to definitive treatment. The images were then analyzed using maximum intensity projection, volume-rendered, and curved multiplane reformation techniques.

RESULTS

All the patients involved in this study were susceptible according to their clinical presentation. The statistical analysis exposed a highly significant difference between CTA and DSA in the assessment of stenosis at the level of Femoropopliteal segment (P<0.01), while for infrapopliteal segment, there was no statistically significant difference between CTA and DSA having 8% versus 14% insignificant stenosis and 62% versus 47% significant stenosis in CTA and DSA, respectively. The overall accuracy of CT angiography in the femoropopliteal segments was 95.20% while in the infrapopliteal segment it was 94.5%.

CONCLUSION

Multidetector CT angiography was found to be a reliable alternative mean for pathoanatomical description of the arterial lesions in critical lower limb ischemia and its subsequent management in comparison to digital subtraction angiography.

摘要

背景

腹主动脉髂动脉及下肢动脉的CT血管造影(CTA)是CT成像技术中一项相对较新的创新,在多排探测器扫描仪引入后发生了变化。

目的

本研究旨在评估多层螺旋CT血管造影(MDCTA)在评估外周动脉闭塞性疾病(PAOD)患者动脉树方面的诊断准确性,并与数字减影血管造影(DSA)进行比较。

方法

2017年2月至2017年10月,对50例主诉外周动脉疾病(慢性期)的患者进行了单中心非随机前瞻性研究。所有患者在确定性治疗前均接受了DSA和CTA检查。然后使用最大密度投影、容积再现和曲面多平面重组技术对图像进行分析。

结果

根据临床表现,本研究纳入的所有患者均易感。统计分析显示,在评估股腘段狭窄方面,CTA和DSA之间存在高度显著差异(P<0.01),而在腘以下段,CTA和DSA之间无统计学显著差异,CTA和DSA的无意义狭窄分别为8%和14%,显著狭窄分别为62%和47%。CT血管造影在股腘段的总体准确率为95.20%,在腘以下段为94.5%。

结论

与数字减影血管造影相比,多层螺旋CT血管造影被发现是一种可靠的替代方法,可用于对严重下肢缺血的动脉病变进行病理解剖描述及其后续治疗。

相似文献

1
Comparison Between Computed Tomography Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Critical Lower Limb Ischemia.计算机断层扫描血管造影术与数字减影血管造影术在下肢严重缺血中的比较
Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2019;15(5):496-503. doi: 10.2174/1573405614666181026112532.
2
CT Angiography of Peripheral Arterial Disease by 256-Slice Scanner: Accuracy, Advantages and Disadvantages Compared to Digital Subtraction Angiography.256层螺旋CT对周围动脉疾病的血管造影:与数字减影血管造影相比的准确性、优缺点
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 Jul;51(5):247-254. doi: 10.1177/1538574417698906. Epub 2017 May 7.
3
Is 64-Row Multi-Detector Computed Tomography Angiography Equal to Digital Subtraction Angiography in Treatment Planning in Critical Limb Ischemia?64 排多层螺旋 CT 血管造影在临界肢体缺血治疗计划中与数字减影血管造影等效吗?
Psychiatr Danub. 2019 Dec;31(Suppl 5):814-820.
4
Accuracy of Noncontrast Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Lower Extremity MR Angiography Versus CT Angiography for Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography.非对比性静息期单次激发下肢磁共振血管成像与 CT 血管成像诊断外周动脉疾病的准确性:与数字减影血管造影的比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Oct;10(10 Pt A):1116-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.030. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
5
The diagnostic value of non-contrast enhanced quiescent interval single shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3T for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, in comparison to CT angiography.3T下非对比增强静息期单次激发(QISS)磁共振血管造影对下肢外周动脉疾病的诊断价值与CT血管造影的比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Oct 20;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0294-6.
6
Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.采用16排CT血管造影术评估腹主动脉髂动脉及下肢动脉:与数字减影血管造影术的前瞻性比较
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):1083-93. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2362040895. Epub 2005 Jul 29.
7
Multislice spiral CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a valuable tool in detecting significant arterial lumen narrowing?多层螺旋CT血管造影术在外周动脉闭塞性疾病中的应用:检测动脉管腔显著狭窄的有效工具?
Eur Radiol. 2004 Sep;14(9):1681-7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2289-1. Epub 2004 Apr 28.
8
Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.钆布醇增强三维磁共振血管造影与数字减影血管造影在下肢外周动脉闭塞性疾病中的比较
Acta Radiol. 2010 Apr;51(3):284-9. doi: 10.3109/02841850903536060.
9
Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla.3.0T 时基于小腿压迫的对比增强磁共振血管成像与数字减影血管造影评估糖尿病合并严重肢体缺血患者间歇期单次激发磁共振血管成像的比较
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Feb;26(1):44-53. doi: 10.1177/1526602818817887. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
10
Diagnostic performance and radiation dose of lower extremity CT angiography using a 128-slice dual source CT at 80 kVp and high pitch.使用128层双源CT在80千伏峰值电压和高螺距条件下进行下肢CT血管造影的诊断性能及辐射剂量
Acta Radiol. 2016 Jul;57(7):822-8. doi: 10.1177/0284185115604512. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro and in vivo optimized reconstruction for low-keV virtual monoenergetic photon-counting detector CT angiography of lower legs.小腿低keV虚拟单能光子计数探测器CT血管造影的体外和体内优化重建
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Aug 1;8(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00481-x.
2
The evaluation value of intracranial magnetic resonance angiography combined with carotid ultrasound in cerebral infarction.颅内磁共振血管造影联合颈动脉超声对脑梗死的评估价值
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jul;40(6):1140-1145. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.6.9312.
3
Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Narrative Review.
外周动脉疾病:一篇叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 11;15(6):e40267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40267. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and the Need for Revascularization.慢性肢体威胁性缺血与血运重建的必要性。
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 4;12(7):2682. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072682.
5
The impact of the field of view (FOV) on image quality in MDCT angiography of the lower extremities.视野(FOV)对下肢 MDCT 血管造影图像质量的影响。
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):2875-2882. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08391-x. Epub 2021 Dec 13.