• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

观点:PI-RADS v2.1 的批判性评估。

Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, 40225, Dusseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):3961-3968. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7.

DOI:10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7
PMID:32009207
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this article we take a critical look at the key changes of the newest edition of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 (v2.1) and indicate future directions for further development of the system.

CONCLUSION

PI-RADS v2.1 addresses some of the shortcomings of its widely embraced precursor version 2, largely to simplify interpretation and improve interobserver agreement without changing the fundamental acquisition and scoring guidelines. Biparametric MRI is acknowledged in the newest version, but multiparametric MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging is still recommended for most scenarios. Management recommendations and guidance on evaluation of follow-up MRI's are still not included in the system.

摘要

目的

在本文中,我们批判性地审视了最新版前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第 2.1 版(v2.1)的主要变化,并指出了该系统进一步发展的未来方向。

结论

PI-RADS v2.1 解决了其广受欢迎的前身版本 2 的一些缺点,主要是通过简化解释和提高观察者间一致性,而不改变基本的采集和评分准则。新版本承认了双参数 MRI,但仍推荐在大多数情况下使用多参数 MRI 包括动态对比增强成像。该系统仍然不包括管理建议和随访 MRI 评估的指导。

相似文献

1
Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1.观点:PI-RADS v2.1 的批判性评估。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):3961-3968. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7.
2
Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.基于PI-RADS v2.1的双参数和多参数MRI在检测临床显著性前列腺癌中的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Jan;53(1):283-291. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27283. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.PI-RADS v. 2 用于评估前列腺癌的多参数 MRI 的读者间一致性:一项使用全组织切片作为参考标准的研究。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Feb;49(2):546-555. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26220. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
4
Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.前列腺影像报告和数据系统第2版(PI-RADS v2)的应用:多参数磁共振成像中高级别前列腺癌定位的观察者间一致性和阳性预测值
Acad Radiol. 2017 Sep;24(9):1101-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 May 22.
5
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: What Urologists Need to Know. Part 2: Interpretation.多参数磁共振成像在检测临床显著前列腺癌中的应用:泌尿科医生需要了解的内容。第 2 部分:解读。
Eur Urol. 2020 Apr;77(4):469-480. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.024. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
6
Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?前列腺多参数和双参数 MRI 比较:常规检查需要使用基于钆的造影剂吗?
World J Urol. 2019 Apr;37(4):691-699. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2428-y. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
7
Round table: arguments in supporting abbreviated or biparametric MRI of the prostate protocol.圆桌会议:支持前列腺简化或双参数 MRI 方案的论据。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):3974-3981. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02510-w.
8
Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.PI-RADS v1 与 v2 对全组织切片病理检查作为参考标准的多参数 MRI 前列腺癌检测的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul;116:180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 14.
9
Assessment of the compliance with minimum acceptable technical parameters proposed by PI-RADS v2 guidelines in multiparametric prostate MRI acquisition in tertiary referral hospitals in the Republic of Turkey.评估土耳其共和国三级转诊医院多参数前列腺 MRI 采集时 PI-RADS v2 指南建议的最低可接受技术参数的符合情况。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 Nov;25(6):421-427. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.18537.
10
Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第 2 版是否能提高多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)报告前位病变的准确性?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Jan;50(1):13-19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1753-1. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving risk stratification of PI-RADS 3 + 1 lesions of the peripheral zone: expert lexicon of terms, multi-reader performance and contribution of artificial intelligence.改善外周区PI-RADS 3+1病变的风险分层:术语专家词典、多读者表现及人工智能的贡献
Cancer Imaging. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s40644-025-00916-7.
2
Values of multiparametric and biparametric MRI in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis.多参数和双参数 MRI 在诊断临床显著前列腺癌中的价值:多变量分析。
BMC Urol. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01411-0.
3
Characterization of high-grade prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI: assessment of PI-RADS version 2.1 and version 2 descriptors across 21 readers with varying experience (MULTI study).

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of prostatectomy without prostate biopsy in the era of new imaging technology and minimally invasive techniques.在新成像技术和微创技术时代,不进行前列腺活检而实施前列腺切除术的可行性。
World J Clin Cases. 2019 Jun 26;7(12):1403-1409. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i12.1403.
2
Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patients.PI-RADS 4 类病例分析:阴性穿刺活检患者的管理建议。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Apr;113:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.030. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate: a critical re-appraisal.
多参数磁共振成像对高级别前列腺癌的特征描述:针对21名经验各异的阅片者评估前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第2.1版及第2版描述符(多中心研究)
Insights Imaging. 2023 Mar 20;14(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01391-z.
4
Arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to diagnose prostate cancer.用于定量动态对比增强磁共振成像诊断前列腺癌的动脉输入函数
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Mar;28(2):108-114. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.19512.
5
Comparison of prostate imaging reporting and data system v2.1 and 2 in transition and peripheral zones: evaluation of interreader agreement and diagnostic performance in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统 v2.1 与 v2 在移行区和周围区的比较:评估在检测临床显著前列腺癌方面的读者间一致性和诊断性能。
Br J Radiol. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20201434. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201434. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
6
Diagnostic Ability of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.动态对比增强磁共振成像对可疑病变中前列腺癌及临床显著性前列腺癌的诊断能力:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 19;11:620628. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620628. eCollection 2021.
7
Biparametric (bp) and multiparametric (mp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach to prostate cancer disease: a narrative review of current debate on dynamic contrast enhancement.双参数(bp)和多参数(mp)磁共振成像(MRI)在前列腺癌疾病中的应用:关于动态对比增强当前争论的叙述性综述
Gland Surg. 2020 Dec;9(6):2235-2247. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-547.
8
Evaluation of a multiparametric MRI radiomic-based approach for stratification of equivocal PI-RADS 3 and upgraded PI-RADS 4 prostatic lesions.基于多参数 MRI 放射组学的方法评估可疑 PI-RADS 3 和升级的 PI-RADS 4 前列腺病变的分层。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):643. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80749-5.
9
Assessment of DCE Utility for PCa Diagnosis Using PI-RADS v2.1: Effects on Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility.使用PI-RADS v2.1评估DCE在前列腺癌诊断中的效用:对诊断准确性和可重复性的影响。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Mar 17;10(3):164. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10030164.
前列腺导管内癌:批判性再评价。
Virchows Arch. 2019 May;474(5):525-534. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02544-6. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.前列腺癌分化与侵袭性:基于放射组学模型与 PI-RADS v2 评估的比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Mar;49(3):875-884. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26243. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
5
Computer-aided diagnosis prior to conventional interpretation of prostate mpMRI: an international multi-reader study.计算机辅助诊断在常规解读前列腺 mpMRI 之前的应用:一项国际多读者研究。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):4407-4417. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5374-6. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
MRI in early prostate cancer detection: how to manage indeterminate or equivocal PI-RADS 3 lesions?早期前列腺癌检测中的磁共振成像:如何处理不确定或可疑的前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)3类病变?
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):70-82. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.31.
7
Genomic Markers in Prostate Cancer Decision Making.前列腺癌决策中的基因组标志物。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):572-582. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
8
A Comparison of Radiologists' and Urologists' Opinions Regarding Prostate MRI Reporting: Results From a Survey of Specialty Societies.放射科医生和泌尿科医生对前列腺 MRI 报告意见的比较:专业学会调查结果。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jan;210(1):101-107. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18241. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
9
Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.前列腺多参数磁共振成像可疑病灶的风险分层。
J Urol. 2018 Mar;199(3):691-698. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.09.074. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
10
Validation of the Dominant Sequence Paradigm and Role of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Imaging in PI-RADS Version 2.PI-RADS v2 版中优势序列范式的验证及动态对比增强成像的作用
Radiology. 2017 Dec;285(3):859-869. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161316. Epub 2017 Jul 19.