• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态对比增强磁共振成像对可疑病变中前列腺癌及临床显著性前列腺癌的诊断能力:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Diagnostic Ability of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zeng Jing, Cheng Qingqing, Zhang Dong, Fan Meng, Shi Changzheng, Luo Liangping

机构信息

Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Engineering Research Center of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 19;11:620628. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620628. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.620628
PMID:33680965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7933498/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) now has been used to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa). Equivocal lesions are defined as PIRADS category 3 or a Likert scale of 1 to 5 category 3 lesions. Currently, there are no clear recommendations for the management of these lesions. This study aimed to estimate the diagnostic capacity of DCE-MRI for PCa and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in equivocal lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two researchers searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science to identify studies that met our subject. We searched for articles that mention the accuracy of the diagnosis of DCE-MRI for PCa or csPCa in equivocal lesions and used histopathological results as the reference standard. We used a tool (the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool) to evaluate the quality of the studies that we screened out. Meta-regression was used to explore the reasons for heterogeneity in results.

RESULTS

Ten articles were eventually included in our study. The sensitivity, specificity and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DCE-MRI in diagnosing csPCa were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.76), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46-0.68). The sensitivity and specificity and 95% CI for DCE-MRI in diagnosing PCa were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.46-0.68), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.45-0.70). The areas under the curve (AUC) of DCE-MRI were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63-0.71) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.55-0.64) while diagnosing csPCa and PCa. Through meta-regression, we found that study design, magnetic field strength, the definition of csPCa, and the scoring system were the sources of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study indicate that the role of DCE-MRI in equivocal lesions may be limited.

摘要

背景

动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)现已用于诊断前列腺癌(PCa)。可疑病变被定义为前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PIRADS)3类或李克特量表1至5级中的3类病变。目前,对于这些病变的处理尚无明确建议。本研究旨在评估DCE-MRI对可疑病变中PCa和临床显著前列腺癌(csPCa)的诊断能力。

材料与方法

两名研究人员检索了PubMed、Embase和科学网,以确定符合我们主题的研究。我们搜索了提及DCE-MRI对可疑病变中PCa或csPCa诊断准确性且以组织病理学结果作为参考标准的文章。我们使用一种工具(诊断准确性研究质量评估-2工具)来评估我们筛选出的研究的质量。采用Meta回归分析来探讨结果异质性的原因。

结果

最终有10篇文章纳入我们的研究。DCE-MRI诊断csPCa的敏感性、特异性及95%置信区间(CI)分别为0.67(95%CI,0.56-0.76)、0.58(95%CI,0.46-0.68)。DCE-MRI诊断PCa的敏感性、特异性及95%CI分别为0.57(95%CI,0.46-0.68)、0.58(95%CI,0.45-0.70)。DCE-MRI在诊断csPCa和PCa时的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.67(95%CI,0.63-0.71)和0.60(95%CI,0.55-0.64)。通过Meta回归分析,我们发现研究设计、磁场强度、csPCa的定义及评分系统是异质性的来源。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,DCE-MRI在可疑病变中的作用可能有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/bfb5a6c8b27b/fonc-11-620628-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/84046a9da969/fonc-11-620628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/812072986968/fonc-11-620628-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/a904c56ed3ba/fonc-11-620628-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/5a19b98dc218/fonc-11-620628-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/bfb5a6c8b27b/fonc-11-620628-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/84046a9da969/fonc-11-620628-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/812072986968/fonc-11-620628-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/a904c56ed3ba/fonc-11-620628-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/5a19b98dc218/fonc-11-620628-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b1c/7933498/bfb5a6c8b27b/fonc-11-620628-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Ability of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.动态对比增强磁共振成像对可疑病变中前列腺癌及临床显著性前列腺癌的诊断能力:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 19;11:620628. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620628. eCollection 2021.
2
Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.探讨 DCE-MRI 相对于 T2 和 DWI 在经根治性前列腺切除术定义的有临床意义的外周带前列腺病变的 PI-RADS v2 评估中的准确作用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Apr;44(4):1520-1527. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1807-6.
3
Comparison of prostate cancer detection rates between magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy according to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System in patients with PSA ≥4 ng/mL: a systematic review and meta-analysis.根据前列腺影像报告和数据系统,对PSA≥4 ng/mL患者进行磁共振成像靶向活检与经直肠超声引导活检的前列腺癌检出率比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Dec;8(6):741-753. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.03.
4
Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MR Imaging in Peripheral Lesions in PI-RADS-4 Patients.动态对比增强(DCE)磁共振成像在PI-RADS-4级患者外周病变中的价值
Rofo. 2020 May;192(5):441-447. doi: 10.1055/a-1020-4026. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
5
The role of gadolinium in magnetic resonance imaging for early prostate cancer diagnosis: A diagnostic accuracy study.钆在磁共振成像早期前列腺癌诊断中的作用:一项诊断准确性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 23;14(12):e0227031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227031. eCollection 2019.
6
Investigating the equivalent performance of biparametric compared to multiparametric MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.研究对比双参数与多参数 MRI 在检测临床显著前列腺癌方面的等效性能。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Feb;45(2):547-555. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02281-z.
7
Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌检测与分期中的应用
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
8
Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.二参数与三参数前列腺 MRI 诊断准确性:评估临床实践中的对比获益。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):4039-4049. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06782-0. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.扩散加权成像联合动态对比增强磁共振成像对前列腺癌的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Radiol. 2021 Sep;62(9):1238-1247. doi: 10.1177/0284185120956269. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
10
The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.磁共振波谱和增强磁共振成像技术在辅助前列腺异常活检定位中的诊断准确性和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 May;17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. doi: 10.3310/hta17200.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating shear wave elastography and multiparametric MRI for accurate prostate cancer diagnosis.整合剪切波弹性成像和多参数磁共振成像以实现前列腺癌的准确诊断。
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):348-362. doi: 10.62347/SNMS7524. eCollection 2025.
2
Refining clinically relevant cut-offs of prostate specific antigen density for risk stratification in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions.优化前列腺特异性抗原密度的临床相关临界值,用于PI-RADS 3类病变患者的风险分层。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2025 Mar;28(1):173-179. doi: 10.1038/s41391-024-00872-6. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Study in the mpMRI of the Prostate-Unnecessary or Underutilised? A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk.系统评价和荟萃分析双参数前列腺 MRI 对有前列腺癌风险男性的诊断准确性。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Sep;24(3):596-611. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00298-w. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Additional Value of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Sequences in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Data from the PROMIS Study.多参数前列腺磁共振成像中动态对比增强序列的附加价值:来自 PROMIS 研究的数据。
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):503-511. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
3
前列腺磁共振成像中的动态对比增强研究——是否不必要或未得到充分利用?一项叙述性综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Nov 20;13(22):3488. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13223488.
4
Design of a magnetic resonance imaging-based screening program for early diagnosis of prostate cancer: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial-Prostate Cancer Secondary Screening in Sapienza (PROSA).基于磁共振成像的前列腺癌早期诊断筛查方案设计:一项随机对照试验的初步结果——萨皮恩扎大学(PROSA)前列腺癌二级筛查。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):204-213. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10019-1. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
5
Multi-parametric MRI for radiotherapy simulation.多参数 MRI 用于放射治疗模拟。
Med Phys. 2023 Aug;50(8):5273-5293. doi: 10.1002/mp.16256. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.
二参数与三参数前列腺 MRI 诊断准确性:评估临床实践中的对比获益。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jul;30(7):4039-4049. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06782-0. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
4
MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.MRI 联合 PSA 密度在检测 PSA 血清水平为 4∼10ng/mL 的患者中具有临床意义的前列腺癌:双参数与多参数 MRI。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020 Apr;101(4):235-244. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
5
Perspective: a critical assessment of PI-RADS 2.1.观点:PI-RADS v2.1 的批判性评估。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):3961-3968. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02424-7.
6
Investigating the equivalent performance of biparametric compared to multiparametric MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.研究对比双参数与多参数 MRI 在检测临床显著前列腺癌方面的等效性能。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Feb;45(2):547-555. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02281-z.
7
Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.双参数和多参数 MRI 诊断前列腺癌的比较。
Cancer Imaging. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s40644-019-0274-9.
8
Added value of diffusion-weighted images and dynamic contrast enhancement in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in the PICTURE trial.在 PICTURE 试验中,扩散加权成像和动态对比增强在多参数磁共振成像检测临床显著前列腺癌中的附加值。
BJU Int. 2020 Mar;125(3):391-398. doi: 10.1111/bju.14953. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
9
Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced (DCE) MR Imaging in Peripheral Lesions in PI-RADS-4 Patients.动态对比增强(DCE)磁共振成像在PI-RADS-4级患者外周病变中的价值
Rofo. 2020 May;192(5):441-447. doi: 10.1055/a-1020-4026. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 Category Cases at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前列腺影像报告和数据系统 3 类前列腺癌多参数磁共振成像病例:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):463-478. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 4.