Suppr超能文献

非卧床的神经肌肉型脊柱侧凸患儿行器械性脊柱融合时,融合范围应包括 L5 还是骨盆?

Should instrumented spinal fusion in nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis be extended to L5 or the pelvis?

机构信息

Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):261-267. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0772.R2.

Abstract

AIMS

It is uncertain whether instrumented spinal fixation in nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis should finish at L5 or be extended to the pelvis. Pelvic fixation has been shown to be associated with up to 30% complication rates, but is regarded by some as the standard for correction of deformity in these conditions. The incidence of failure when comparing the most caudal level of instrumentation, either L5 or the pelvis, using all-pedicle screw instrumentation has not previously been reported. In this retrospective study, we compared nonambulatory patients undergoing surgery at two centres: one that routinely instrumented to L5 and the other to the pelvis.

METHODS

In all, 91 nonambulatory patients with neuromuscular scoliosis were included. All underwent surgery using bilateral, segmental, pedicle screw instrumentation. A total of 40 patients underwent fusion to L5 and 51 had their fixation extended to the pelvis. The two groups were assessed for differences in terms of clinical and radiological findings, as well as complications.

RESULTS

The main curve (MC) was a mean of 90° (40° to 141°) preoperatively and 46° (15° to 82°) at two-year follow-up in the L5 group, and 82° (33° to 116°) and 19° (1° to 60°) in the pelvic group (p < 0.001 at follow-up). Correction of MC and pelvic obliquity (POB) were statistically greater in the pelvic group (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the operating time, blood loss, or complications. Loss of MC correction (> 10°) was more common in patients fixated to the pelvis (23% vs 3%; p = 0.032), while loss of pelvic obliquity correction was more frequent in the L5 group (25% vs 0%; p = 0.007). Risk factors for loss of correction (either POB or MC) included preoperative coronal imbalance (> 50 mm, odds ratio (OR) 11.5, 95%confidence interval (CI) 2.0 to 65; p = 0.006) and postoperative sagittal imbalance (> 25 mm, OR 11.0, 95% CI1.9 to 65; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

We found that patients undergoing pelvic fixation had a greater correction of MC and POB. The rate of complications was not different. Preoperative coronal and postoperative sagittal imbalance were associated with increased risks of loss of correction, regardless of extent of fixation. Therefore, we recommend pelvic fixation in all nonambulatory children with neuromuscular scoliosis where coronal or sagittal imbalance are present preoperatively. Cite this article: 2020;102-B(2):261-267.

摘要

目的

对于患有神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸的不能行走的儿童,器械性脊柱固定是应终止于 L5 还是应延伸至骨盆,目前尚不确定。骨盆固定已被证明与高达 30%的并发症发生率相关,但在这些情况下,一些人认为它是矫正畸形的标准。使用全椎弓根螺钉固定器比较最尾端器械水平(L5 或骨盆)的失败发生率以前尚未有报道。在这项回顾性研究中,我们比较了在两个中心接受手术的不能行走的患者:一个中心常规固定到 L5,另一个中心固定到骨盆。

方法

共纳入 91 例患有神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸的不能行走的患者。所有患者均接受双侧、节段性、椎弓根螺钉固定器手术。共有 40 例患者融合至 L5,51 例患者固定至骨盆。评估两组在临床和影像学发现以及并发症方面的差异。

结果

L5 组的主弯(MC)术前平均为 90°(40°至 141°),两年随访时为 46°(15°至 82°),骨盆组为 82°(33°至 116°)和 19°(1°至 60°)(随访时 P<0.001)。骨盆组 MC 和骨盆倾斜度(POB)的矫正程度在统计学上更大(P<0.001)。手术时间、失血量或并发症无统计学显著差异。骨盆固定组 MC 矫正丢失(>10°)更为常见(23% vs 3%;P=0.032),而 L5 组 POB 矫正丢失更为常见(25% vs 0%;P=0.007)。矫正丢失的危险因素(POB 或 MC)包括术前冠状失平衡(>50mm,比值比(OR)11.5,95%置信区间(CI)2.0 至 65;P=0.006)和术后矢状失平衡(>25mm,OR 11.0,95%CI1.9 至 65;P=0.008)。

结论

我们发现接受骨盆固定的患者 MC 和 POB 的矫正程度更大。并发症发生率无差异。术前冠状和术后矢状失平衡与矫正丢失的风险增加相关,而与固定范围无关。因此,我们建议所有术前存在冠状或矢状失平衡的神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸不能行走的儿童均行骨盆固定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验