肱二头肌沟上方肱二头肌长头腱固定术：嵌体和覆盖技术的生物力学比较
Long head of biceps tenodesis at the superior aspect of the biceps groove: A biomechanical comparison of inlay and onlay techniques.
作者信息
Cagle Paul J, London Daniel A, Gluck Matthew J, Morel Sabrina, Parsons Bradford O
机构信息
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
出版信息
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Feb;12(1):12-17. doi: 10.1177/1758573218815281. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
Abstract
PURPOSE
Pathology involving the long head of the biceps tendon is a common source of shoulder pain. Biceps tenodesis has been successfully used in areas below the pectoralis, above the pectoralis, and above the biceps groove. However, clinical data are lacking for additional techniques for tenodesis at the superior aspect of the biceps groove.
METHODS
A biomechanical comparison was completed examining six matched pairs of cadaveric shoulders. The ultimate load to failure was compared between an inlay and onlay biceps tenodesis at the superior aspect of the biceps groove.
RESULTS
The results demonstrate an average construct strength of 215 N for the inlay technique and 210 N for the onlay technique. The difference between the two techniques was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates similar biomechanical strength for both constructs.
摘要
目的
肱二头肌长头腱相关病理改变是肩部疼痛的常见原因。肱二头肌固定术已成功应用于胸大肌下方、胸大肌上方及肱二头肌沟上方区域。然而，关于肱二头肌沟上方区域进行固定术的其他技术，临床数据尚缺乏。
方法
完成了一项生物力学比较研究，对六对匹配的尸体肩部进行检测。比较了肱二头肌沟上方区域镶嵌式和覆盖式肱二头肌固定术的极限破坏载荷。
结果
结果表明，镶嵌式技术的平均结构强度为215 N，覆盖式技术为210 N。两种技术之间的差异不显著。
结论
本研究表明两种结构具有相似的生物力学强度。
相似文献
1
Long head of biceps tenodesis at the superior aspect of the biceps groove: A biomechanical comparison of inlay and onlay techniques.肱二头肌沟上方肱二头肌长头腱固定术：嵌体和覆盖技术的生物力学比较
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Feb;12(1):12-17. doi: 10.1177/1758573218815281. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
2
Biomechanical Comparison of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Onlay Techniques.胸大肌下肱二头肌肌腱固定覆盖技术的生物力学比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Oct 15;7(10):2325967119876276. doi: 10.1177/2325967119876276. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Long head biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis.肱二头肌长头腱切断术与腱固定术：一项尸体生物力学分析
Arthroscopy. 2005 Feb;21(2):182-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.10.014.
4
Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis Outcomes: A Comparison of Inlay and Onlay Techniques.关节镜下肱二头肌肌腱固定术的结果：嵌压技术与重叠技术的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Oct;48(12):3051-3056. doi: 10.1177/0363546520952357. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
5
Onlay Versus Inlay Biceps Tenodesis for Long Head of Biceps Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肱二头肌长头肌腱病的上置式与内置式肌腱固定术比较：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2022 Dec 9;6(12). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00255. eCollection 2022 Dec 1.
6
Proximal Biceps Tenodesis: An Anatomic Study and Comparison of the Accuracy of Arthroscopic and Open Techniques Using Interference Screws.经关节镜和开放技术应用骨螺钉干扰固定治疗肱二头肌近侧止点撕脱性骨折：解剖学研究和准确性比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2014 Feb 19;2(2):2325967114522198. doi: 10.1177/2325967114522198. eCollection 2014 Feb.
7
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.经关节腱骨固定术治疗肩袖撕裂的生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jun;34(6):1755-1761. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
8
Biomechanical comparison of long head of biceps tenodesis with interference screw and biceps sling soft tissue techniques.长头肱二头肌止点腱骨固定术与干扰螺钉和肱二头肌吊带软组织技术的生物力学比较。
Arthroscopy. 2013 Jul;29(7):1157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 May 29.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis.肱二头肌肌腱固定术的开放缝线锚钉固定与干涉螺钉固定的生物力学评估
Orthopedics. 2011 Jul 7;34(7):e275-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110526-04.
10
Biomechanical evaluation of two arthroscopic techniques for biceps tenodesis: triple loop suture versus simple suture.两种关节镜下肱二头肌肌腱固定术技术的生物力学评估：三重环缝合法与简单缝合法。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.05.019. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
引用本文的文献
1
Arthroscopic Double-Cinch Double-Cerclage Technique for Proximal Biceps Tenodesis.关节镜下双束双环扎技术治疗肱二头肌近端固定术
Arthrosc Tech. 2025 Feb 12;14(6):103464. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2025.103464. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Arthroscopic In Situ Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double Loop-and-Tack Knotless Suture Anchor.使用双环扣和钉式无结缝合锚钉的关节镜原位肱二头肌肌腱固定术
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Jul 31;12(8):e1437-e1442. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.04.014. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using an All-Suture Knotless Anchor.使用全缝线无结锚钉进行胸大肌下肱二头肌固定术
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 May 15;12(6):e937-e942. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.02.030. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Outcomes of Biceps Tenodesis Variations With Concomitant Rotator Cuff Repair: A Multicenter Database Analysis.肱二头肌固定术联合肩袖修复术的疗效：一项多中心数据库分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jun 21;11(6):23259671231180173. doi: 10.1177/23259671231180173. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Histopathology of long head of biceps tendon removed during tenodesis demonstrates degenerative histopathology and not inflammatory changes.在腱固定术中切除的肱二头肌长头肌腱的组织病理学表现为退行性组织病理学改变，而不是炎症性改变。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 26;23(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05124-z.
6
Supraspinatus repair and biceps tenodesis in competitive CrossFit athletes allow for a 100% of return to sport.在竞技 CrossFit 运动员中，进行冈上肌修复和肱二头肌固定术可以 100%恢复运动。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Dec;29(12):3929-3935. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06345-2. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
7
Arthroscopic Onlay Articular Margin Biceps Tenodesis for Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Pathology.关节镜下关节边缘嵌贴式肱二头肌长头肌腱固定术治疗肱二头肌长头肌腱病变
Arthrosc Tech. 2020 Jun 18;9(7):e959-e963. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.03.011. eCollection 2020 Jul.
本文引用的文献
1
Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.经关节腱骨固定术治疗肩袖撕裂的生物力学评估。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Jun;34(6):1755-1761. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
2
Biceps Tenodesis: Biomechanical Assessment of 3 Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Techniques.肱二头肌固定术：三种关节镜下胸肌上入路技术的生物力学评估
Orthopedics. 2017 Nov 1;40(6):e1009-e1016. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170925-03. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
3
All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Without the Use of Interference Screws.不使用干涉螺钉的全关节镜下肱二头肌长头胸大肌上入路与开放胸大肌下入路肌腱固定术
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
4
Proximal versus distal screw placement for biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical study.二头肌固定术近端与远端螺钉置入的生物力学研究
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2016 Aug;24(2):258-61. doi: 10.1177/1602400227.
5
Patients Have Strong Preferences and Perceptions for Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis.与肱二头肌肌腱固定术相比，患者对肱二头肌肌腱切断术有强烈的偏好和认知。
Arthroscopy. 2016 Dec;32(12):2444-2450. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.022. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
6
Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis in Active Patients Younger Than 55 Years: Is There a Difference in Strength and Outcomes?肱二头肌切开术与 55 岁以下活动患者的肌腱固定术：在力量和结果方面是否有差异？
Orthop J Sports Med. 2015 Feb 12;3(2):2325967115570848. doi: 10.1177/2325967115570848. eCollection 2015 Feb.
7
Systematic Review of Biceps Tenodesis: Arthroscopic Versus Open.肱二头肌肌腱固定术的系统评价：关节镜手术与开放手术对比
Arthroscopy. 2016 Feb;32(2):365-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.028. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
8
All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii.全关节镜下肱二头肌长头胸大肌上止点固定术与开放胸大肌下止点固定术的比较
Am J Sports Med. 2015 May;43(5):1077-83. doi: 10.1177/0363546515570024. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
9
Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical comparison of a new "soft anchor" tenodesis technique versus interference screw biceps tendon fixation.胸大肌上缘肱二头肌肌腱固定术：一种新型“软锚钉”肌腱固定技术与干涉螺钉固定肱二头肌肌腱的生物力学比较
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Feb;30(2):188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.12.001. Epub 2014 Dec 8.
10
Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of restoration of length-tension and mechanical strength between techniques.关节镜下胸大肌上和开放胸大肌下肱二头肌肌腱固定术：两种技术之间长度-张力恢复和机械强度的比较
Arthroscopy. 2015 Apr;31(4):620-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
Zotero 插件