Christ Church, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
North West Anglia NHS Foundation Trust, Peterborough City Hospital, Peterborough, UK.
BJOG. 2020 May;127(6):694-700. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16150. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Developing a shared agenda is an important step in ensuring future research has the necessary relevance.
To characterise research priority setting partnerships (PSPs) relevant to women's health.
Included studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and the James Lind Alliance (JLA) database.
Priority setting partnerships using formal consensus methods.
Descriptive narrative to describe the study characteristics, methods, and results.
Ten national and two international PSPs were identified. All PSPs used the JLA method to identify research priorities. Nine PSPs had published a protocol. Potential research uncertainties were gathered from guidelines (two studies), Cochrane reviews (five studies), and surveys (12 studies). The number of healthcare professionals (31-287), patients (44-932), and others (33-139) who responded to the survey, and the number of uncertainties submitted (52-4767) varied. All PSPs entered confirmed research uncertainties (39-104) into interim priority setting surveys and healthcare professionals (31-287), patients (44-932), and others (33-139) responded. All PSPs entered a short list of research uncertainties into a consensus development meeting, which enabled healthcare professionals (six to 21), patients (eight to 14), and others (two to 13) to identify research priorities (ten to 15). Four PSPs have published their results.
Future research priority setting studies should publish a protocol, use formal consensus development methods, and ensure their methods and results are comprehensively reported.
Research published in @BJOGtweets highlights future research priorities across women's health, including @FertilityTop10, @jamesmnduffy.
制定共同议程是确保未来研究具有必要相关性的重要步骤。
描述与妇女健康相关的研究重点设置伙伴关系 (PSP)。
通过搜索 MEDLINE 和詹姆斯林德联盟 (JLA) 数据库确定纳入研究。
使用正式共识方法的重点设置伙伴关系。
描述性叙述描述研究特征、方法和结果。
确定了 10 个国家和 2 个国际 PSP。所有 PSP 都使用 JLA 方法确定研究重点。9 个 PSP 已经发布了方案。从指南 (2 项研究)、Cochrane 综述 (5 项研究) 和调查 (12 项研究) 中收集了潜在的研究不确定性。回应调查的医疗保健专业人员 (31-287)、患者 (44-932) 和其他人员 (33-139) 的数量以及提交的不确定性数量 (52-4767) 有所不同。所有 PSP 都将已确认的研究不确定性 (39-104) 输入到中期重点设置调查中，医疗保健专业人员 (31-287)、患者 (44-932) 和其他人员 (33-139) 做出了回应。所有 PSP 都将一小组研究不确定性输入共识发展会议，使医疗保健专业人员 (6 至 21 人)、患者 (8 至 14 人) 和其他人员 (2 至 13 人) 能够确定研究重点 (10 至 15 项)。有 4 个 PSP 已经发表了他们的研究结果。
未来的研究重点设置研究应发布方案，使用正式的共识开发方法，并确保全面报告其方法和结果。
发表在@BJOGtweets 的研究突出了妇女健康领域的未来研究重点，包括@FertilityTop10、@jamesmnduffy。
