Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Mar 1;174(3):260-268. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.5669.
Rapid and accurate diagnosis of late-onset infection in newborn infants could inform treatment decisions and avoid unnecessary administration of antibiotics.
To compare the accuracy of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) with that of microbiological blood culture for diagnosing late-onset infection in newborns.
MEDLINE (1946-2019), Embase (1946-2019), and Science Citation Index (1900-2019) databases were searched for references (any language). The MeSH search terms included were "exp infant, newborn/" or "premature birth/" plus free text synonyms; and "C-reactive protein/" plus free text synonyms; and "exp sepsis/" or "exp bacterial infections/" plus free text synonyms. The proceedings from relevant conferences and references of identified papers were scrutinized. Authors were contacted to request missing data.
Cohort and cross-sectional studies were included that compared the accuracy of serum CRP levels with microbiological culture results to diagnose late-onset (>72 hours after birth) infection in newborns (any gestational age) hospitalized after birth. Two reviewers assessed study eligibility. Among 10 394 records, 148 studies were assessed as full texts.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline extension for Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) reviews was followed. Two reviewers assessed the method quality of each study using guidance from the Cochrane Screening and Diagnostic Test Methods Group (adapted from the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2).
The primary meta-analysis outcome was diagnostic test accuracy of serum CRP level taken at initial investigation of an infant with suspected late-onset infection. The median specificity (proportion of true-negative results) and calculated pooled sensitivity (proportion of true-positive results) were determined by generating hierarchical summary receiver characteristic operating curves.
In total, 22 studies with 2255 infants were included (sample size range, 11-590 infants). Participants in most studies were preterm (<37 weeks) or very low-birth weight (<1500 g) infants. Two studies additionally enrolled infants born at term. Most studies (16) used a prespecified CRP level cutoff for a "positive" index test (5-10 mg/L), and most studies (17) used the culture of a pathogenic microorganism from blood as the reference standard. Risk of bias was low with independent assessment of index and reference tests. At median specificity (0.74), pooled sensitivity was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.50-0.72). Adding serum CRP level to the assessment of an infant with a 40% pretest probability of late-onset infection (the median for the included studies) generated posttest probabilities of 26% for a negative test result and 61% for a positive test result.
The findings suggest that determination of serum CRP level at initial evaluation of an infant with suspected late-onset infection is unlikely to aid early diagnosis or to select infants to undergo further investigation or treatment with antimicrobial therapy or other interventions.
快速准确地诊断新生儿晚期感染可以为治疗决策提供信息,并避免不必要地使用抗生素。
比较血清 C 反应蛋白 (CRP) 与微生物血培养对诊断新生儿晚期感染的准确性。
对 MEDLINE(1946-2019 年)、Embase(1946-2019 年)和科学引文索引(1900-2019 年)数据库进行了检索,检索语言不限。使用的 MeSH 检索词包括“新生儿/早产”或“婴儿,新生/”加上同义词的自由文本;和“C 反应蛋白/”加上同义词的自由文本;和“败血症/”或“细菌感染/”加上同义词的自由文本。还仔细审查了相关会议的会议记录和已确定论文的参考文献。联系作者以请求缺失的数据。
纳入了比较血清 CRP 水平与微生物培养结果以诊断出生后住院的晚期(出生后>72 小时)感染(任何胎龄)新生儿的准确性的队列研究和横断面研究。两名审查员评估了研究的合格性。在 10394 条记录中,有 148 项研究被评估为全文。
遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)诊断测试准确性(DTA)扩展指南。两名审查员使用 Cochrane 筛查和诊断测试方法小组的指导(改编自诊断准确性研究 2 的质量评估)评估了每项研究的方法质量。
主要的荟萃分析结果是在疑似晚期感染婴儿的初始检查中进行血清 CRP 水平的诊断测试准确性。通过生成分层总结接收者特征工作曲线确定中位数特异性(真阴性结果的比例)和计算的 pooled 敏感性(真阳性结果的比例)。
共纳入 22 项研究,涉及 2255 名婴儿(样本量范围为 11-590 名婴儿)。大多数研究的参与者是早产儿(<37 周)或极低出生体重儿(<1500 克)。两项研究还招募了足月出生的婴儿。大多数研究(16 项)使用了预先指定的 CRP 水平截断值(5-10mg/L)作为“阳性”指标测试,大多数研究(17 项)使用血液中致病微生物的培养作为参考标准。独立评估指标和参考测试的偏倚风险较低。在中位数特异性(0.74)时,pooled 敏感性为 0.62(95%CI,0.50-0.72)。在考虑了一个患有 40%晚期感染可能性的婴儿的预测试验概率(包括研究的中位数)后,阴性试验结果的后测试概率为 26%,阳性试验结果的后测试概率为 61%。
研究结果表明,在疑似晚期感染的婴儿初始评估时测定血清 CRP 水平不太可能有助于早期诊断,也不太可能选择婴儿进行进一步检查或接受抗生素治疗或其他干预措施。