Suppr超能文献

坦索罗辛和安慰剂与坦索罗辛和他达拉非治疗男性下尿路症状的比较:一项双盲、随机对照试验。

Tamsulosin and placebo vs tamsulosin and tadalafil in male lower urinary tract symptoms: a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Departments of, Department of, Urology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Department of, Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2020 May;125(5):718-724. doi: 10.1111/bju.15027. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of tamsulosin vs the combination of tamsulosin and tadalafil in male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a double-blinded, parallel-arm randomised controlled trial. Men aged >45 years with moderate LUTS and a maximum urinary flow rate (Q ) of 5-15 mL/s were included. One arm received 0.4 mg tamsulosin only (Group-A), while the second received 5 mg tadalafil with tamsulosin (Group-B). The primary outcome was the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Secondary outcomes were IPSS quality of life (QoL) score, five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score, Q , and post-void residual urine (PVR). Block randomisation was used. Placebo was used for blinding and allocation concealment. Intention-to-treat analysis was used for outcome measures.

RESULTS

Of the 183 men screened, 140 were randomised (71 in Group-A, 69 in Group-B); 116 (82.85%) (61 in Group-A, 55 in Group-B) completed the study. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The improvements in the IPSS, IPSS QoL score, IIEF score and Q were -1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.4 to -2.0), -0.70 (95% CI -0.60 to -0.80), 3.8 (95% CI 3.4-4.2) and 1.8 mL/s (95% CI 1.1-2.4) respectively, in favour of the combination group. The difference in PVR was not significant. There were no serious adverse events (AEs). The dropout rate due to AEs was 2.85%. Myalgia (five patients) was the commonest AE in the combination group.

CONCLUSION

The combination of tamsulosin and tadalafil produced significantly better improvements in LUTS, QoL, erectile function and Q compared to monotherapy with tamsulosin, without an increase in AEs.

摘要

目的

比较坦索罗辛与坦索罗辛联合他达拉非治疗男性下尿路症状(LUTS)的疗效和安全性。

患者和方法

这是一项双盲、平行臂随机对照试验。纳入年龄>45 岁、中度 LUTS 且最大尿流率(Q )为 5-15ml/s 的男性。一组接受 0.4mg 坦索罗辛(A 组),另一组接受坦索罗辛联合 5mg 他达拉非(B 组)。主要结局是国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)。次要结局是 IPSS 生活质量(QoL)评分、国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-5)五分量表评分、Q 和残余尿量(PVR)。采用区组随机化。安慰剂用于双盲和分组隐匿。意向治疗分析用于评估结局。

结果

在筛选的 183 名男性中,有 140 名被随机分配(A 组 71 名,B 组 69 名);116 名(82.85%)(A 组 61 名,B 组 55 名)完成了研究。基线特征相似。IPSS、IPSS QoL 评分、IIEF 评分和 Q 的改善分别为-1.69(95%置信区间 [CI] -1.4 至-2.0)、-0.70(95% CI -0.60 至-0.80)、3.8(95% CI 3.4-4.2)和 1.8ml/s(95% CI 1.1-2.4),组合组更优。PVR 差异无统计学意义。无严重不良事件(AE)。因 AE 导致的退出率为 2.85%。组合组最常见的 AE 是肌痛(五例)。

结论

与坦索罗辛单药治疗相比,坦索罗辛联合他达拉非治疗 LUTS、QoL、勃起功能和 Q 可显著改善,且 AE 无增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验