Department of Urology, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
BJU Int. 2020 May;125(5):656-663. doi: 10.1111/bju.15024. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
The aim of the paper is to provide an overview of intraoperative sampling methods for frozen section (FS) analysis and of surgical techniques for a secondary neurovascular bundle (NVB) resection, as the method of surgical margin (SM) sampling and the management of a positive SM (PSM) at the nerve-sparing (NS) area are under evaluated issues. FS analysis during radical prostatectomy (RP) can help to tailor the plane of dissection based on cancer extension and thus extend the indications for NS surgery.
We performed a PubMed/Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Elton B. Stephens Co. (EBSCO)host search to include articles published in the last decade, evaluating FS analysis in the NS area and surgical attempts to convert a PSM to a negative status.
Overall, 19 papers met our inclusion criteria. The ways to collect samples for FS analysis included: systematic (analysing the whole posterolateral aspect of the prostate specimen, i.e., neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination [NeuroSAFE]); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided (biopsies from MRI-suspicious areas, retrieved by the surgeon in a cognitive way); and random biopsies from the soft periprostatic tissues. Techniques to address a PSM in the NS area included: full resection of the spared NVB, from its caudal to cranial aspect, often including the rectolateral part of the Denonvilliers' fascia; partial resection of the NVB, in cases where sampling attempts to localise a PSM; incremental approach, meaning a partial or full resection that extends until no prostate tissue is found in the soft periprostatic environment.
There is no homogeneity in prostate sampling for FS analysis, although most recent evidence is moving toward a systematic sampling of the entire NS area. The management of a PSM is variable and can be affected by the sampling strategy (difficult localisation of the persisting tumour at the NVB). The difficult identification of the exact soft tissue location contiguous to a PSM could be considered as the critical point of FS analysis and of spared-NVB management.
本文旨在概述术中冰冻切片(FS)分析的取样方法和二次神经血管束(NVB)切除的手术技术,因为在神经保留(NS)区域,手术切缘(SM)取样方法和处理阳性 SM(PSM)的管理是评估不足的问题。在根治性前列腺切除术(RP)中进行 FS 分析可以帮助根据癌症的扩展来调整解剖平面,从而扩大 NS 手术的适应证。
我们在 PubMed/医学文献分析和检索系统在线(MEDLINE)、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和 Elton B. Stephens Co.(EBSCO)host 上进行了搜索,纳入了过去十年发表的评估 NS 区域 FS 分析和尝试将 PSM 转化为阴性状态的手术的文章。
总体而言,有 19 篇论文符合我们的纳入标准。用于 FS 分析的样本收集方法包括:系统收集(分析前列腺标本的整个后外侧部分,即神经血管结构毗邻的冰冻切片检查[NeuroSAFE]);磁共振成像(MRI)引导(从 MRI 可疑区域进行活检,由外科医生以认知的方式取回);和从软前列腺周围组织中随机活检。处理 NS 区域 PSM 的技术包括:从尾到头完全切除保留的 NVB,通常包括 Denonvilliers 筋膜的直肠外侧部分;部分切除 NVB,适用于取样尝试定位 PSM 的情况;增量方法,即部分或完全切除,直到在软前列腺周围环境中没有前列腺组织为止。
FS 分析的前列腺取样方法没有一致性,尽管最近的证据越来越倾向于对整个 NS 区域进行系统取样。PSM 的处理方法是可变的,可能受到取样策略的影响(在 NVB 处难以定位持续存在的肿瘤)。难以确定与 PSM 相邻的精确软组织位置可能被认为是 FS 分析和保留 NVB 管理的关键点。