Duric Neb, Sak Mark, Fan Shaoqi, Pfeiffer Ruth M, Littrup Peter J, Simon Michael S, Gorski David H, Ali Haythem, Purrington Kristen S, Brem Rachel F, Sherman Mark E, Gierach Gretchen L
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Delphinus Medical Technologies, Novi, MI 48374, USA.
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 29;9(2):367. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020367.
Mammographic percent density (MPD) is an independent risk factor for developing breast cancer, but its inclusion in clinical risk models provides only modest improvements in individualized risk prediction, and MPD is not typically assessed in younger women because of ionizing radiation concerns. Previous studies have shown that tissue sound speed, derived from whole breast ultrasound tomography (UST), a non-ionizing modality, is a potential surrogate marker of breast density, but prior to this study, sound speed has not been directly linked to breast cancer risk. To that end, we explored the relation of sound speed and MPD with breast cancer risk in a case-control study, including 61 cases with recent breast cancer diagnoses and a comparison group of 165 women, frequency matched to cases on age, race, and menopausal status, and with a recent negative mammogram and no personal history of breast cancer. Multivariable odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for the relation of quartiles of MPD and sound speed with breast cancer risk adjusted for matching factors. Elevated MPD was associated with increased breast cancer risk, although the trend did not reach statistical significance (OR per quartile = 1.27, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.70; p = 0.10). In contrast, elevated sound speed was significantly associated with breast cancer risk in a dose-response fashion (OR per quartile = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.32, 2.54; p = 0.0003). The OR trend for sound speed was statistically significantly different from that observed for MPD ( = 0.005). These findings suggest that whole breast sound speed may be more strongly associated with breast cancer risk than MPD and offer future opportunities for refining the magnitude and precision of risk associations in larger, population-based studies, including women younger than usual screening ages.
乳腺X线摄影密度百分比(MPD)是患乳腺癌的一个独立风险因素,但其纳入临床风险模型仅能在个体风险预测方面带来适度改善,并且由于电离辐射问题,通常不在年轻女性中评估MPD。先前的研究表明,源自全乳超声断层扫描(UST,一种非电离方式)的组织声速是乳腺密度的一个潜在替代标志物,但在本研究之前,声速尚未与乳腺癌风险直接关联。为此,我们在一项病例对照研究中探讨了声速和MPD与乳腺癌风险的关系,该研究包括61例近期被诊断为乳腺癌的病例以及一个由165名女性组成的对照组,对照组在年龄、种族和绝经状态上与病例进行频率匹配,且近期乳腺X线摄影检查为阴性且无乳腺癌个人史。针对经匹配因素调整后的MPD和声速四分位数与乳腺癌风险的关系,估计了多变量优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。MPD升高与乳腺癌风险增加相关,尽管该趋势未达到统计学显著性(每四分位数的OR = 1.27,95% CI:0.95,1.70;p = 0.10)。相比之下,声速升高以剂量反应方式与乳腺癌风险显著相关(每四分位数的OR = 1.83,95% CI:1.32,2.54;p = 0.0003)。声速的OR趋势与MPD观察到的趋势在统计学上有显著差异( = 0.005)。这些发现表明,全乳声速可能比MPD与乳腺癌风险的关联更强,并为在更大规模的基于人群的研究(包括低于常规筛查年龄的女性)中细化风险关联的程度和精度提供了未来机会。